Yeo Boong Hua

Yeo Boong Hua is a individual in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 8 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 19 counsels. Through 7 law firms. Their track record shows a 37.5% success rate in resolved cases. They have been involved in 8 complex cases, representing 100.0% of their total caseload.

Legal Representation

Yeo Boong Hua has been represented by 7 law firms and 19 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
TSMP Law Corporation	2 cases	Hari Veluri Ong Pei Ching Adrian Tan Joel Goh Joel Goh Chee Hsien
Stamford Law Corporation	1 case	Roy Paul Mukkam Ong Pei Ching Adrian Tan Lim Siok Khoon
Haq and Selvam	1 case	Oommen Mathew
Drew & Napier LLC	1 case	Ong Pei Ching Tan Gim Hai Adrian Yeoh Jean Wern Nurul 'Aziah Binte Muhammad Hussin
Central Chambers Law Corporation	1 case	Ramasamy s/o Karuppan Chettiar Rajendran Kumaresan Devinder Rai Koh Sim Teck Ronnie Tan Siew Bin
AsiaLegal LLC	1 case	Timothy Tan Thye Hoe Wendy Leong Marnyi
Alice Yeo and Company	1 case	Alice Yeo

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Yeo Boong Hua's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 9.3
Complex Cases: 8 (100.0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	48.8 parties avg	8.8	50.0%
Partial	18.0 parties avg	8.0	12.5%
Won	310.3 parties avg	10.3	37.5%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2019	111.0 parties avg	11.0
2018	19.0 parties avg	9.0
2015	111.0 parties avg	11.0
2012	111.0 parties avg	11.0
2010	18.0 parties avg	8.0
2009	18.0 parties avg	8.0
2008	18.0 parties avg	8.0
2004	18.0 parties avg	8.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Yeo Boong Hua's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	4(50.0%)	50.0%
Partial	1(12.5%)	12.5%
Won	3(37.5%)	37.5%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	1,773,812.50	443,453.134 cases	4

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2019	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2012	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2010	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2009	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2008	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2004	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 8 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2019-sghc-73 14 Mar 2019	14 Mar 2019	Plaintiff	WonCosts of $435,500 awarded for the Four Hearings (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	2018-sgca-79 21 Nov 2018	21 Nov 2018	Respondent	WonThe respondent was awarded damages in the amount of $1,338,312.50, jointly and severally from the appellants. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	2015-sghc-207 05 Aug 2015	05 Aug 2015	Plaintiff	WonConsent Order set aside.
4	2012-sghc-227 11 Nov 2012	11 Nov 2012	Plaintiff	LostThe plaintiff's action to set aside the Consent Order was dismissed with costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
5	2010-sghc-136 02 May 2010	02 May 2010	Appellant, Plaintiff	LostPlaintiffs’ appeals were dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
6	2009-sghc-34 11 Feb 2009	11 Feb 2009	Plaintiff	LostPlaintiff's application for a stay of the application was dismissed.
7	2008-sghc-93 22 Jun 2008	22 Jun 2008	Plaintiff	LostThe plaintiffs' application for further orders and/or clarification and/or variation of the consent order was dismissed.
8	2004-sghc-38 23 Feb 2004	23 Feb 2004	Plaintiff	PartialPrayer (1) of SIC 5348 of 2003 was dismissed in so far as the amendment referred to the settlement agreement, but the addition of the prayer that the company be wound up was allowed. Both parties then consented to the amendment of the OS to include a prayer in the alternative that the defendants be ordered to purchase the plaintiff’s shares in the first defendant.