AYM

AYM is a individual in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 12 counsels. Through 4 law firms. Their track record shows a 20.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Legal Representation

AYM has been represented by 4 law firms and 12 counsels.

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of AYM's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case
2.2
Complex Cases
0 (0.0%)
Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

TypeCases
Lost22.5 parties avg
Partial22.0 parties avg
Won12.0 parties avg

Complexity Trends Over Time

YearCases
201513.0 parties avg
201412.0 parties avg
201312.0 parties avg
201222.0 parties avg

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of AYM's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome TypeCases
Lost2(40.0%)
Partial2(40.0%)
Won1(20.0%)

Monetary Outcomes

CurrencyAverage
SGD422,500.004 cases

Yearly Outcome Trends

YearTotal Cases
20151
1
20141
1
20131
1
20122
11

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

CaseRoleOutcome
28 Dec 2015
DefendantLostThe court issued a worldwide injunction order against the defendant.
25 Aug 2014
AppellantPartialThe Judge’s order for maintenance was reduced so that the Husband is to pay a lump sum of $690,000 to the Wife being a sum of $100,000 by way of lump sum maintenance for her and a sum of $590,000 by way of lump sum maintenance for the Children inclusive of their school fees. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
10 Nov 2013
Defendant, HusbandLostOrdered to pay $1 million as lump sum maintenance to the wife and children (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
22 Nov 2012
AppellantPartialAppeal against the refusal to vary the terms of division of matrimonial assets was dismissed. Appeal against the order of a lump sum maintenance of $750,000 to be paid to the Wife out of the Husband’s share of the sale proceeds was allowed. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
22 Mar 2012
Respondent, PlaintiffWonVariation orders in her favor upheld; AYL's appeal dismissed. Costs to be taxed if not agreed.