Crédit Industriel et Commercial
Crédit Industriel et Commercial is a corporation in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 11 counsels. Through 3 law firms. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases.
Legal Representation
Crédit Industriel et Commercial has been represented by 3 law firms and 11 counsels.
Law Firm | Cases Handled |
---|---|
Drew & Napier LLC | 1 case |
Wong Partnership LLP | 1 case |
WongPartnership LLP | 2 cases |
Case Complexity Analysis
Analysis of Crédit Industriel et Commercial's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.
Complexity Overview
- Average Parties per Case
- 2.0
- Complex Cases
- 0 (0.0%)
- Cases with more than 3 parties
Complexity by Case Type
Type | Cases |
---|---|
Lost | 22.0 parties avg |
Won | 22.0 parties avg |
Complexity Trends Over Time
Year | Cases |
---|---|
2013 | 12.0 parties avg |
2012 | 12.0 parties avg |
2011 | 12.0 parties avg |
2010 | 12.0 parties avg |
Case Outcome Analytics
Analysis of Crédit Industriel et Commercial's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.
Outcome Distribution
Outcome Type | Cases |
---|---|
Lost | 2(50.0%) |
Won | 2(50.0%) |
Monetary Outcomes
Currency | Average |
---|---|
SGD | 6,459,519.831 cases |
Yearly Outcome Trends
Year | Total Cases |
---|---|
2013 | 1 1 |
2012 | 1 1 |
2011 | 1 1 |
2010 | 1 1 |
Case History
Displaying all 4 cases
Case | Role | Outcome |
---|---|---|
16 May 2013 | Respondent | LostThe Bank’s claims against Teo are dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
02 May 2012 | Plaintiff | WonJudgment for the plaintiff. Teo is to pay CIC $2,782,803.66 for the shares delivered, $3,625,393.11 for closing out costs, and interest of $51,323.06 as of 29 August 2008 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore). |
10 Apr 2011 | Respondent | LostThe judgment in favor of Crédit Industriel et Commercial was set aside, and a new trial was ordered. |
19 May 2010 | Plaintiff | WonJudgment for the plaintiff; the specific monetary amount was not specified in the judgment extract. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore. |