Ho Sally

Ho Sally is a individual in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 15 counsels. Through 3 law firms. Their track record shows a 80.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have been involved in 5 complex cases, representing 100.0% of their total caseload.

Legal Representation

Ho Sally has been represented by 3 law firms and 15 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
Advocatus Law LLP	2 cases	Lim Yi Zheng Christopher Anand s/o Daniel Harjean Kaur Yeo Yi Ling Eileen Saadhvika Jayanth Christopher Anand Daniel Eileen Yeo
Drew & Napier LLC	1 case	Cavinder Bull Lin Shumin Ho Wei Wen Daryl
Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP	2 cases	Wong Soon Peng Adrian Ng Tee Tze Allen Timothy Ng Sin Zhan Ng Tee Tze Allen and Ang Leong Hao

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Ho Sally's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 5.0
Complex Cases: 5 (100.0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	15.0 parties avg	5.0	20.0%
Won	45.0 parties avg	5.0	80.0%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2023	25.0 parties avg	5.0
2020	25.0 parties avg	5.0
2019	15.0 parties avg	5.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Ho Sally's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(20.0%)	20.0%
Won	4(80.0%)	80.0%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2023	1 2	Won: 2 cases (200.0%)
2020	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2019	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2023-sghca-36 16 Nov 2023	16 Nov 2023	Respondent	WonThe court upheld the respondents' position regarding the appeal process.
2	2023-sghc-96 13 Apr 2023	13 Apr 2023	Defendant	WonJudgment in favor of the defendant; all claims against them were dismissed.
3	2020-sghc-137 02 Jul 2020	02 Jul 2020	Defendant	WonThe application for a Mareva injunction against the defendant was dismissed.
4	2020-sgca-29 02 Apr 2020	02 Apr 2020	Respondent, Applicant, Plaintiff	LostAppeal dismissed; required to pay costs of $25,000 plus reasonable disbursements to the appellant. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	2019-sghc-103 22 Apr 2019	22 Apr 2019	Applicant, Defendant	WonThe application to enjoin LVM Law Chambers LLC from acting for Chan Pik Sun in Suit 806 was allowed.