MS First Capital Insurance Limited

MS First Capital Insurance Limited is a corporation in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 8 counsels. Through 3 law firms. Their track record shows a 33.3% success rate in resolved cases.

Legal Representation

MS First Capital Insurance Limited has been represented by 3 law firms and 8 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
LVM Law Chambers LLC	2 cases	Lee Sien Liang Joseph Lok Vi Ming SC Pak Waltan Lok Vi Ming Qabir Singh Sandhu Yap Pei Yin
Duxton Hill Chambers	1 case	Toby Landau
Rachel Low LLC	1 case	Rachel Low Tze-Lynn

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of MS First Capital Insurance Limited's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.3
Complex Cases: 0 (0.0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	22.5 parties avg	2.5	66.7%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	33.3%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2023	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2020	22.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of MS First Capital Insurance Limited's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(66.7%)	66.7%
Won	1(33.3%)	33.3%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	44,629.30	14,876.433 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2023	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2023-sgca-45 20 Dec 2023	20 Dec 2023	Appellant	LostAppellants to pay respondent costs of S$40,000 for CA 3 and OA 18, and disbursements amounting to S$4,629.30. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	2020-sghc-256 19 Nov 2020	19 Nov 2020	Plaintiff, Defendant in Counterclaim	WonThe court declared that the sum of S$500,000 paid by the defendant to the plaintiff in September 2013 was paid towards the Burning Cost Premium under the Policy, and that the defendant is accordingly not entitled to any refund of that amount. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	2020-sghc-251 15 Nov 2020	15 Nov 2020	Defendant, Appellant	LostThe defendant's appeal seeking a stay of proceedings in favour of arbitration was dismissed. The court ordered that the defendant pay to the plaintiff the costs of the appeal fixed at $6,000 plus disbursements, to be fixed by me if not agreed. (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore)