Roslan bin Bakar
Roslan bin Bakar is a individual in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 16 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 9 counsels. Through 10 law firms. They have been involved in 11 complex cases, representing 68.8% of their total caseload.
Legal Representation
Roslan bin Bakar has been represented by 10 law firms and 9 counsels.
| Law Firm | Cases Handled |
|---|---|
| Chung Ting Fai & Co | 1 case |
| Kertar and Sadhu LLC | 1 case |
| Kertar Law LLC | 1 case |
| K Ravi Law Corporation | 1 case |
| L F Violet Netto | 2 cases |
| K K Cheng Law LLC | 3 cases |
| KK Cheng Law LLC | 1 case |
| Bajwa & Co | 1 case |
| LF Violet Netto | 1 case |
| B S Gill & Co | 1 case |
Case Complexity Analysis
Analysis of Roslan bin Bakar's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.
Complexity Overview
- Average Parties per Case
- 14.6
- Complex Cases
- 11 (68.8%)
- Cases with more than 3 parties
Complexity by Case Type
| Type | Cases |
|---|---|
| Lost | 1614.6 parties avg |
Complexity Trends Over Time
| Year | Cases |
|---|---|
| 2025 | 132.0 parties avg |
| 2024 | 316.0 parties avg |
| 2023 | 137.0 parties avg |
| 2022 | 612.7 parties avg |
| 2021 | 216.0 parties avg |
| 2017 | 13.0 parties avg |
| 2016 | 12.0 parties avg |
| 2010 | 13.0 parties avg |
Case Outcome Analytics
Analysis of Roslan bin Bakar's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.
Outcome Distribution
| Outcome Type | Cases |
|---|---|
| Lost | 16(100.0%) |
Monetary Outcomes
| Currency | Average |
|---|---|
| SGD | 6,000.005 cases |
Yearly Outcome Trends
| Year | Total Cases |
|---|---|
| 2025 | 1 1 |
| 2024 | 1 3 |
| 2023 | 1 1 |
| 2022 | 1 6 |
| 2021 | 1 2 |
| 2017 | 1 1 |
| 2016 | 1 1 |
| 2010 | 1 1 |
Case History
Displaying all 16 cases
| Case | Role | Outcome |
|---|---|---|
04 Feb 2025 | Applicant | LostApplication dismissed due to lack of standing and no reasonable cause of action. |
13 Nov 2024 | Applicant | LostApplication for permission to make a post-appeal application in a capital case was dismissed. No monetary amount was involved. Currency assumed to be SGD, the currency of Singapore. |
26 Sep 2024 | Applicant | LostApplication for review of conviction dismissed. |
26 Mar 2024 | Appellant, Applicant | LostAppeal dismissed due to lack of standing. |
04 Dec 2023 | Applicant | LostApplication dismissed for lack of standing and no reasonable cause of action. |
03 Aug 2022 | Appellant, Claimant | LostThe appeal against the decision to strike out the originating claim was dismissed. |
26 Jul 2022 | Applicant, Appellant, Plaintiff | LostCosts ordered against counsel for filing frivolous motion and appeal. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore). |
22 Jun 2022 | Plaintiff | LostCosts of the three applications, fixed at $20,000, are to be borne personally by Mr Cheng and Mr Ravi jointly and severally. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
11 May 2022 | Plaintiff | LostCosts of OS 1025 and SUM 4742 fixed at $10,000 and reasonable disbursements, to be paid to the Attorney-General (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore). |
08 Mar 2022 | Appellant | LostAppeal dismissed; death sentence remains. |
06 Mar 2022 | Applicant | LostApplication for leave to review prior decisions related to drug trafficking conviction and death sentence was dismissed. |
01 Dec 2021 | Plaintiff | LostThe plaintiff's claim was dismissed. |
29 Nov 2021 | Plaintiff | LostCosts of the OS to be borne by counsel personally instead of the plaintiff. |
12 Nov 2017 | Applicant | LostApplication for re-sentencing dismissed. |
08 May 2016 | Applicant | LostThe applicant's motion seeking leave to adduce new evidence and an order for a retrial was dismissed. |
21 Apr 2010 | Defendant | LostRoslan was found guilty as charged. |