Ser Kim Koi

Ser Kim Koi is a individual in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 9 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 19 counsels. Through 6 law firms. Their track record shows a 22.2% success rate in resolved cases. They have been involved in 8 complex cases, representing 88.9% of their total caseload.

Legal Representation

Ser Kim Koi has been represented by 6 law firms and 19 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
Dentons Rodyk & Davidson LLP	1 case	Thng Huilin Melissa Toh Wei Qing, Geraldine Kirindeep Singh Ajinderpal Singh Tan Hui Min Beverly Thng Hui Lin Melissa
Drew & Napier LLC	1 case	Chong Chi Chuin Christopher Josh Samuel Tan Wensu Chen Zhihui Calvin Lee
Rodyk & Davidson LLP	1 case	Kirindeep Singh Ajinderpal Singh Philip Jeyaretnam Jay Lee Koh Jiaying Hsien
Thng	1 case	Derek Kang
Adrian Tan with Vanita Jegathesan	1 case	Adrian Tan
MPillay	2 cases	Yeo Boon Tat Mohan Reviendran Pillay Danna Er Danna Dolly Er

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Ser Kim Koi's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.4
Complex Cases: 8 (88.9%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	33.3 parties avg	3.3	33.3%
Partial	45.5 parties avg	5.5	44.4%
Won	24.0 parties avg	4.0	22.2%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2022	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2021	24.0 parties avg	4.0
2016	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2014	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2009	17.0 parties avg	7.0
2008	25.5 parties avg	5.5
2006	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Ser Kim Koi's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	3(33.3%)	33.3%
Partial	4(44.4%)	44.4%
Won	2(22.2%)	22.2%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	641,816.32	128,363.265 cases	5

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2022	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2016	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2014	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2009	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2008	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2006	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 9 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2022-sghca-34 02 Oct 2022	02 Oct 2022	Appellant, Plaintiff in counterclaim	PartialAppeal allowed in part regarding the determination of delay length, certification process, and liquidated damages.
2	2021-sghca-2 25 Mar 2021	25 Mar 2021	Applicant, Defendant, Plaintiff in counterclaim	PartialLeave to appeal against the costs order granted; appeal on costs to be heard together with the substantive appeal. Ser Kim Koi was ordered to pay GTMS $1,000 forthwith, inclusive of disbursements, as costs for the leave application. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	2021-sghc-33 09 Feb 2021	09 Feb 2021	Defendant, Plaintiff in counterclaim	LostOrdered to pay costs to the plaintiff and third parties on a standard basis until specific dates, then on an indemnity basis thereafter. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	2016-sgca-7 03 Mar 2016	03 Mar 2016	Appellant, Defendant	WonAppeal allowed; judgment and orders for costs entered below by the AR and the Judge are set aside; Appellant is to have his costs here and below; monies furnished by the Appellant as security for costs for this appeal and the sum of $640,816.32 ordered by the Judge to be paid into court by the Appellant are to be paid out to the Appellant. Assumed SGD as the jurisdiction is Singapore.
5	2014-sghc-232 03 Nov 2014	03 Nov 2014	Defendant, Appellant	LostAppeal dismissed; required to pay costs of $10,000 with reasonable disbursements to the plaintiff (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
6	2009-sghc-5 06 Jan 2009	06 Jan 2009	Plaintiff	PartialImplied undertaking released for specific documents disclosed by the second to fourth defendants, but dismissed for documents disclosed by the first defendant.
7	2008-sghc-131 12 Aug 2008	12 Aug 2008	Defendant	WonSuccessfully applied to strike out portions of the plaintiff's statement of claim.
8	2008-sghc-23 12 Feb 2008	12 Feb 2008	Plaintiff	PartialThe plaintiffs' appeal against the assistant registrar’s decision was dismissed in part.
9	2006-sghc-178 30 Aug 2006	30 Aug 2006	Plaintiff	LostPlaintiff's application for access to documents was disallowed due to conflict of interest and legal privilege.