UBS AG

UBS AG is a corporation in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 19 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 20 counsels. Through 6 law firms. Their track record shows a 84.2% success rate in resolved cases. They have been involved in 8 complex cases, representing 42.1% of their total caseload.

Legal Representation

UBS AG has been represented by 6 law firms and 20 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
WongPartnership LLP	1 case	Chua Sui Tong Daniel Tan Andre Maniam SC
Drew & Napier LLC	1 case	Teo Chun-Wei Benedict Kabir Singh Davinder Singh Davinder Singh SC Hri Kumar Nair Ben Tan James Low Benedict Teo Harsharan Kaur Bhullar Hri Kumar Tan Shou Min Chiu Rouwei Charmaine Charmaine Chiu Gary Low
Engelin Teh Practice LLC	1 case	Harish Kumar
Drew and Napier LLC	2 cases	Kabir Singh Davinder Singh Davinder Singh SC Shivani Retnam James Low Hri Kumar Charmaine Chiu Gary Low
Drew & Napier	2 cases	Davinder Singh Hri Kumar
Unknown	1 case	Charmaine Chan Tan Shou Min

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of UBS AG's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.2
Complex Cases: 8 (42.1%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	13.0 parties avg	3.0	5.3%
Neutral	13.0 parties avg	3.0	5.3%
Partial	15.0 parties avg	5.0	5.3%
Won	163.1 parties avg	3.1	84.2%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2016	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2014	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2012	43.5 parties avg	3.5
2011	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2006	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2005	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2004	23.5 parties avg	3.5
2003	43.0 parties avg	3.0
2002	33.3 parties avg	3.3

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of UBS AG's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(5.3%)	5.3%
Neutral	1(5.3%)	5.3%
Partial	1(5.3%)	5.3%
Won	16(84.2%)	84.2%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	20,333.33	2,033.3310 cases	10

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2016	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2014	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2012	4 1111	Lost: 1 cases (25.0%) Neutral: 1 cases (25.0%) Partial: 1 cases (25.0%) Won: 1 cases (25.0%)
2011	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2006	1 2	Won: 2 cases (200.0%)
2005	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2004	1 2	Won: 2 cases (200.0%)
2003	1 4	Won: 4 cases (400.0%)
2002	1 3	Won: 3 cases (300.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 19 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2016-sghc-17 09 Feb 2016	09 Feb 2016	Defendant	WonCourt ruled in favor of the defendant, UBS AG.
2	2014-sghc-134 09 Jul 2014	09 Jul 2014	Defendant	WonThe court found in favor of the defendant, dismissing the plaintiffs' claim.
3	2012-sghc-170 15 Aug 2012	15 Aug 2012	Defendant, Respondent	PartialAppeal allowed in part regarding the time period for the keyword search term 'protest'.
4	2012-sgca-43 14 Aug 2012	14 Aug 2012	Respondent	LostThe appeal against the decision to strike out the SOC was allowed in part.
5	2012-sghc-41 27 Feb 2012	27 Feb 2012	Defendant	NeutralOrder for electronic discovery protocol in stages with the use of search terms.
6	2012-sghc-30 08 Feb 2012	08 Feb 2012	Defendant, Respondent	WonAppeal upheld with costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
7	2011-sghc-170 13 Jul 2011	13 Jul 2011	Plaintiff, Respondent	WonAppeal against the stay applications was dismissed. Appeal against the anti-suit injunction was dismissed. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
8	2006-sghc-139 01 Aug 2006	01 Aug 2006	Respondent	WonAppeal dismissed with costs fixed at $2,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
9	2006-sghc-18 31 Jan 2006	31 Jan 2006	Defendant, Respondent	WonThe application for the judge to recuse himself was dismissed.
10	2005-sgca-3 16 Jan 2005	16 Jan 2005	Respondent	WonApplication to strike out appeal granted with costs to be taxed and security deposit to be paid equally to the respondents. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore. Calculated amount is UBS AG's share of the security deposit.
11	2004-sghc-187 26 Aug 2004	26 Aug 2004	Respondent	WonCosts awarded to UBS (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
12	2004-sgca-33 28 Jul 2004	28 Jul 2004	Respondent	WonAppeal dismissed in favor of UBS AG, with costs awarded to UBS AG.
13	2003-sghc-305 07 Dec 2003	07 Dec 2003	Defendant	WonJudgment in favor of the defendant; plaintiff's claim dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
14	2003-sgca-16 14 Apr 2003	14 Apr 2003	Respondent	WonCosts of $5000 awarded to UBS AG. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
15	2003-sghc-55 12 Mar 2003	12 Mar 2003	Respondent, Defendant	WonUBS AG was awarded costs of $5,000, to be paid by Anthony Wee (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
16	2003-sgca-5 09 Feb 2003	09 Feb 2003	Respondent	WonAppeal dismissed with costs. The security for costs, together with any accrued interest, shall be released to the respondent UBS to account of its costs of the appeal. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
17	2002-sghc-260 01 Nov 2002	01 Nov 2002	Defendant	WonCosts of $5,000 awarded against the Plaintiff (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
18	2002-sghc-213 15 Sep 2002	15 Sep 2002	Defendant, Respondent	WonThe defendant successfully opposed the plaintiff's attempt to have a lawyer argue on his behalf as a friend.
19	2002-sghc-206 06 Sep 2002	06 Sep 2002	Defendant, Respondent	WonDefendant's application for orders under section 175 of the Evidence Act to inspect bank records was granted.