Wee Soon Kim Anthony
Wee Soon Kim Anthony is a individual in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 22 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 12 counsels. Through 6 law firms. Their track record shows a 18.2% success rate in resolved cases. They have been involved in 3 complex cases, representing 13.6% of their total caseload.
Legal Representation
Wee Soon Kim Anthony has been represented by 6 law firms and 12 counsels.
Law Firm | Cases Handled |
---|---|
Independent Practitioner | 1 case |
Rodyk and Davidson | 1 case |
Goh Aik Leng & Partners | 1 case |
Chor Pee and Partners | 2 cases |
Lim Chor Pee & Partners | 1 case |
Khattar Wong & Partners | 1 case |
Case Complexity Analysis
Analysis of Wee Soon Kim Anthony's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.
Complexity Overview
- Average Parties per Case
- 2.4
- Complex Cases
- 3 (13.6%)
- Cases with more than 3 parties
Complexity by Case Type
Type | Cases |
---|---|
Lost | 142.4 parties avg |
Neutral | 12.0 parties avg |
Partial | 32.3 parties avg |
Won | 42.5 parties avg |
Complexity Trends Over Time
Year | Cases |
---|---|
2007 | 11.0 parties avg |
2006 | 42.3 parties avg |
2005 | 42.8 parties avg |
2004 | 22.0 parties avg |
2003 | 42.3 parties avg |
2002 | 22.0 parties avg |
2001 | 43.0 parties avg |
2000 | 12.0 parties avg |
Case Outcome Analytics
Analysis of Wee Soon Kim Anthony's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.
Outcome Distribution
Outcome Type | Cases |
---|---|
Lost | 14(63.6%) |
Neutral | 1(4.5%) |
Partial | 3(13.6%) |
Won | 4(18.2%) |
Monetary Outcomes
Currency | Average |
---|---|
SGD | 1,384.6213 cases |
Yearly Outcome Trends
Year | Total Cases |
---|---|
2007 | 1 1 |
2006 | 2 31 |
2005 | 2 31 |
2004 | 2 11 |
2003 | 2 31 |
2002 | 1 2 |
2001 | 3 112 |
2000 | 1 1 |
Case History
Displaying all 22 cases
Case | Role | Outcome |
---|---|---|
07 May 2007 | Applicant | LostOriginating Summons dismissed due to failure to serve the OS on affected parties and lack of jurisdictional foundation. |
26 Nov 2006 | Plaintiff | PartialThe court ordered the Law Society to apply to the Chief Justice for the appointment of a disciplinary committee in relation to the complaint concerning the issue of the invoice for $612,300. |
01 Aug 2006 | Appellant | LostAppeal dismissed with costs fixed at $2,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore). |
01 Mar 2006 | Appellant | LostThe appellant's appeal against the decision to set aside the statutory demands was dismissed. |
31 Jan 2006 | Plaintiff, Applicant | LostThe application for the judge to recuse himself was dismissed. |
05 Dec 2005 | Appellant | WonAppeal allowed with costs; security for costs to be refunded to Wee. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
29 Aug 2005 | Appellant | LostThe appellant's appeal was dismissed. |
23 May 2005 | Respondent | LostRespondent's application to strike out the petition was dismissed with costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore). |
16 Jan 2005 | Appellant | LostAppeal struck out with costs payable to all three respondents to be taxed and the security deposit of $10,000 to be released to the respondents equally. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
28 Jul 2004 | Appellant | LostAppeal dismissed with costs awarded to the respondent. |
11 Jan 2004 | Respondent | WonThe court dismissed the summons brought against Mr. Wee. |
07 Dec 2003 | Plaintiff | LostPlaintiff's claim was dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
05 Jun 2003 | Plaintiff | LostPlaintiff's application to amend his statement of claim was dismissed, and he was ordered to pay costs of $5000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore). |
20 Feb 2003 | Applicant, Appellant | PartialSum claimed by Mr Wee under item 29 reduced to $1,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore). |
09 Feb 2003 | Appellant | LostAppeal dismissed with costs. The security for costs, together with any accrued interest, shall be released to the respondent UBS to account of its costs of the appeal. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
15 Sep 2002 | Plaintiff, Appellant | LostThe appeal against the order preventing Mr. Goh from presenting arguments on the plaintiff's behalf was dismissed. |
06 May 2002 | Appellant | LostAppeal dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
06 Dec 2001 | Plaintiff | NeutralNot specified in the provided text. |
20 Aug 2001 | Appellant | WonAppeal allowed and order of the assistant registrar set aside. |
08 Mar 2001 | Plaintiff, Appellant | LostAppeal dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
12 Feb 2001 | Appellant | WonAppeal allowed with costs here and below and the usual consequential orders (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore). |
03 Aug 2000 | Plaintiff | PartialDeclaration granted in respect of the fourth complaint only. Plaintiff to pay costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore. |