Dentistry and dental practice

Dentistry and dental practice is a specialized practice area in Singapore's legal system. This area encompasses 3 cases from 2003 to 2024.

Leading Law Firms

Analysis of law firms specializing in Dentistry and dental practice, ranked by case volume and success rates.

Law FirmCases
Braddell Brothers LLP0.00% success rate1 cases33.3% of area
K&L Gates Straits Law LLC0.00% success rate1 cases33.3% of area
Charles Lin LLC0.00% success rate1 cases33.3% of area
Harry Elias Partnership0.00% success rate1 cases33.3% of area
Straits Law Practice LLC0.00% success rate1 cases33.3% of area
MyintSoe & Selvaraj100.00% success rate1 cases33.3% of area
Rodyk & Davidson100.00% success rate1 cases33.3% of area
Lim & Lim100.00% success rate1 cases33.3% of area

Notable Lawyers

Leading lawyers practicing in Dentistry and dental practice, ranked by case volume and success rates.

LawyerCases
Kronenburg Edmund Jerome0.00% success rate1 cases33.3% of area
Chan Yu Jie0.00% success rate1 cases33.3% of area
Tan Chee Meng0.00% success rate1 cases33.3% of area
N. Sreenivasan SC0.00% success rate1 cases33.3% of area
Lim Min0.00% success rate1 cases33.3% of area
Kamini Devadass0.00% success rate1 cases33.3% of area
Lin Ming Khin0.00% success rate1 cases33.3% of area
Lim Wan Ting Tracia0.00% success rate1 cases33.3% of area
Poh Jia Wei Daniel0.00% success rate1 cases33.3% of area
Tan Qian Ni Roseanne0.00% success rate1 cases33.3% of area

Recent Judgments

Displaying 3 most recent judgments out of 3 total cases

No.TitleCourtDecision DateOutcomes
1Amit Patel v Singapore Dental Council: Appeal on Professional Misconduct in Dentist SupervisionGeneral Division of the High Court of the Republic of Singapore23 Jul 2024
Appeal against conviction dismissed; appeal against orders allowed in part.
2Hennedige Oliver v Singapore Dental Council: Professional Misconduct & Informed ConsentHigh Court28 Nov 2006
Appeal Allowed
3Elan Impex v Daewoo: Wrongful Termination, Service Out of Jurisdiction, and Forum Non ConveniensHigh Court07 Feb 2003
Action against the first defendant and fourth defendant struck out; orders giving leave to serve outside jurisdiction set aside; interim injunctions discharged; claim against the third defendant and the Mareva injunction against him stayed.