Groundless threat

Groundless threat is a specialized practice area in Singapore's legal system. This area encompasses 9 cases from 2000 to 2022.

Leading Law Firms

Analysis of law firms specializing in Groundless threat, ranked by case volume and success rates.

Law FirmCases
Via Law Corporation33.33% success rate3 cases33.3% of area
Bird & Bird ATMD LLP0.00% success rate2 cases22.2% of area
Infinitus Law Corporation50.00% success rate2 cases22.2% of area
Joyce A. Tan & Partners LLC50.00% success rate2 cases22.2% of area
Dentons Rodyk & Davidson LLP50.00% success rate2 cases22.2% of area
Apex Law LLC0.00% success rate1 cases11.1% of area
Drew & Napier100.00% success rate1 cases11.1% of area
Sanders Law LLC0.00% success rate1 cases11.1% of area
Salem Ibrahim LLC0.00% success rate1 cases11.1% of area
S K Kumar Law Practice LLP0.00% success rate1 cases11.1% of area

Notable Lawyers

Leading lawyers practicing in Groundless threat, ranked by case volume and success rates.

LawyerCases
Bryan Manaf Ghows50.00% success rate2 cases22.2% of area
Oh Pin-Ping0.00% success rate2 cases22.2% of area
Wang Yingyu0.00% success rate2 cases22.2% of area
Lim Ying Sin Daniel33.33% success rate2 cases22.2% of area
Loy Ming Chuen Brendan0.00% success rate1 cases11.1% of area
Sarbrinder Singh s/o Naranjan Singh0.00% success rate1 cases11.1% of area
Long Ai Ming100.00% success rate1 cases11.1% of area
G Radakrishnan100.00% success rate1 cases11.1% of area
Lim Jun Hao Alvin0.00% success rate1 cases11.1% of area
Tay Yu E0.00% success rate1 cases11.1% of area

Recent Judgments

Displaying 9 most recent judgments out of 9 total cases

No.TitleCourtDecision DateOutcomes
1Triple D Trading v Fanco Fan Marketing: Trade Mark Invalidity & Groundless ThreatGeneral Division of the High Court of the Republic of Singapore15 Sep 2022
Judgment for the Defendant on its counterclaim; Plaintiff's claim dismissed.
2Dr. Babor v Sante De Beaute: Groundless Threat of Trade Mark InfringementHigh Court11 Jul 2018
Sante De Beaute's claim in groundless threat fails.
3Lee Tat Cheng v Maka GPS Technologies: Patent Infringement & Groundless Threat of ProceedingsCourt of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore05 Apr 2018
Appeal allowed in part.
4Global Yellow Pages v Promedia: Copyright Infringement in Telephone DirectoriesCourt of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore18 Apr 2017
Appeal allowed in part and otherwise dismissed.
5Lee Tat Cheng v Maka GPS Technologies: Patent Infringement, Validity & Groundless ThreatHigh Court of the Republic of Singapore12 Mar 2017
Judgment for Defendant on non-infringement; Injunction granted to Defendant against Plaintiff's groundless threats.
6Towa Corp v ASM Technology: Patent Infringement, Moulding Machine, Inventive StepHigh Court21 Dec 2016
Judgment for Plaintiff
7Allergan v Ferlandz Nutra: Trade Mark Infringement, Passing Off & Malicious Falsehood in Eyelash Growth ProductsHigh Court of the Republic of Singapore19 Jul 2016
Judgment for Plaintiffs on trade mark infringement and passing off claims; Defendant's counterclaim and malicious falsehood claim dismissed.
8Bean Innovations v Flexon: Patent Infringement, Groundless Threat, Mailbox AssemblyCourt of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore25 May 2001
Appeal dismissed with costs.
9-13 Apr 2000
Unknown