Groundless threat
Groundless threat is a specialized practice area in Singapore's legal system. This area encompasses 9 cases from 2000 to 2022.
Leading Law Firms
Analysis of law firms specializing in Groundless threat, ranked by case volume and success rates.
Law Firm | Cases |
---|---|
Via Law Corporation33.33% success rate | 3 cases33.3% of area |
Bird & Bird ATMD LLP0.00% success rate | 2 cases22.2% of area |
Infinitus Law Corporation50.00% success rate | 2 cases22.2% of area |
Joyce A. Tan & Partners LLC50.00% success rate | 2 cases22.2% of area |
Dentons Rodyk & Davidson LLP50.00% success rate | 2 cases22.2% of area |
Apex Law LLC0.00% success rate | 1 cases11.1% of area |
Drew & Napier100.00% success rate | 1 cases11.1% of area |
Sanders Law LLC0.00% success rate | 1 cases11.1% of area |
Salem Ibrahim LLC0.00% success rate | 1 cases11.1% of area |
S K Kumar Law Practice LLP0.00% success rate | 1 cases11.1% of area |
Notable Lawyers
Leading lawyers practicing in Groundless threat, ranked by case volume and success rates.
Lawyer | Cases |
---|---|
Bryan Manaf Ghows50.00% success rate | 2 cases22.2% of area |
Oh Pin-Ping0.00% success rate | 2 cases22.2% of area |
Wang Yingyu0.00% success rate | 2 cases22.2% of area |
Lim Ying Sin Daniel33.33% success rate | 2 cases22.2% of area |
Loy Ming Chuen Brendan0.00% success rate | 1 cases11.1% of area |
Sarbrinder Singh s/o Naranjan Singh0.00% success rate | 1 cases11.1% of area |
Long Ai Ming100.00% success rate | 1 cases11.1% of area |
G Radakrishnan100.00% success rate | 1 cases11.1% of area |
Lim Jun Hao Alvin0.00% success rate | 1 cases11.1% of area |
Tay Yu E0.00% success rate | 1 cases11.1% of area |
Recent Judgments
Displaying 9 most recent judgments out of 9 total cases
No. | Title | Court | Decision Date | Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Triple D Trading v Fanco Fan Marketing: Trade Mark Invalidity & Groundless Threat | General Division of the High Court of the Republic of Singapore | 15 Sep 2022 | Judgment for the Defendant on its counterclaim; Plaintiff's claim dismissed. |
2 | Dr. Babor v Sante De Beaute: Groundless Threat of Trade Mark Infringement | High Court | 11 Jul 2018 | Sante De Beaute's claim in groundless threat fails. |
3 | Lee Tat Cheng v Maka GPS Technologies: Patent Infringement & Groundless Threat of Proceedings | Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore | 05 Apr 2018 | Appeal allowed in part. |
4 | Global Yellow Pages v Promedia: Copyright Infringement in Telephone Directories | Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore | 18 Apr 2017 | Appeal allowed in part and otherwise dismissed. |
5 | Lee Tat Cheng v Maka GPS Technologies: Patent Infringement, Validity & Groundless Threat | High Court of the Republic of Singapore | 12 Mar 2017 | Judgment for Defendant on non-infringement; Injunction granted to Defendant against Plaintiff's groundless threats. |
6 | Towa Corp v ASM Technology: Patent Infringement, Moulding Machine, Inventive Step | High Court | 21 Dec 2016 | Judgment for Plaintiff |
7 | Allergan v Ferlandz Nutra: Trade Mark Infringement, Passing Off & Malicious Falsehood in Eyelash Growth Products | High Court of the Republic of Singapore | 19 Jul 2016 | Judgment for Plaintiffs on trade mark infringement and passing off claims; Defendant's counterclaim and malicious falsehood claim dismissed. |
8 | Bean Innovations v Flexon: Patent Infringement, Groundless Threat, Mailbox Assembly | Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore | 25 May 2001 | Appeal dismissed with costs. |
9 | - | 13 Apr 2000 | Unknown |