Identification Evidence

Identification Evidence is a specialized practice area in Singapore's legal system. This area encompasses 5 cases from 2004 to 2020.

Leading Law Firms

Analysis of law firms specializing in Identification Evidence, ranked by case volume and success rates.

Law Firm	Cases	Success Rate	Key Lawyers	Recent Cases
Attorney-General’s Chambers100.00% success rate	3 cases60.0% of area	100.00% success rate	Teo Siu Ming (1 cases) Chan Yi Cheng (1 cases) Anandan Bala (1 cases)	Mohammad Rizwan v Public Prosecutor: Drug Trafficking, Abetment, Adducing Fresh Evidence(May 2020) Hishamrudin bin Mohd v Public Prosecutor: Reopening of Concluded Criminal Appeals and Abuse of Process(Mar 2018) Sivakumar v PP: Sexual Assault, Impersonation, and Consent(Mar 2014)
Deputy Public Prosecutor50.00% success rate	2 cases40.0% of area	50.00% success rate	Glenn Seah Kim Ming (1 cases) Eddy Tham (1 cases)	Phua Song Hua v Public Prosecutor: Rioting Conviction and Sentencing Appeal(Feb 2004) Govindaraj Perumalsamy v PP: Identification Parade Irregularities and Sentencing in Robbery with Hurt Case(Feb 2004)
Gomez & Vasu LLC0.00% success rate	1 cases20.0% of area	0.00% success rate	Rakesh s/o Pokkan Vasu (1 cases) Nevinjit Singh J (1 cases) Yeo Ying Hao (1 cases)	Mohammad Rizwan v Public Prosecutor: Drug Trafficking, Abetment, Adducing Fresh Evidence(May 2020)
Gloria James-Civetta & Co0.00% success rate	1 cases20.0% of area	0.00% success rate	Foo Cheow Ming (1 cases) Amarjit Singh (1 cases) Gloria James (1 cases)	Sivakumar v PP: Sexual Assault, Impersonation, and Consent(Mar 2014)
MSC Law Corporation0.00% success rate	1 cases20.0% of area	0.00% success rate	Chia Soo Michael (1 cases) Hany Soh Hui Bin (1 cases) Wang Shi Mei (1 cases)	Mohammad Rizwan v Public Prosecutor: Drug Trafficking, Abetment, Adducing Fresh Evidence(May 2020)
Thangavelu LLC0.00% success rate	1 cases20.0% of area	0.00% success rate	Thangavelu (1 cases)	Mohammad Rizwan v Public Prosecutor: Drug Trafficking, Abetment, Adducing Fresh Evidence(May 2020)
Gomez & Vasu0.00% success rate	1 cases20.0% of area	0.00% success rate	Winnifred Gomez (1 cases)	Mohammad Rizwan v Public Prosecutor: Drug Trafficking, Abetment, Adducing Fresh Evidence(May 2020)
A Rajandran Joseph and Nayar100.00% success rate	1 cases20.0% of area	100.00% success rate	A Rajandran (1 cases) Pratap Kishan (1 cases)	Govindaraj Perumalsamy v PP: Identification Parade Irregularities and Sentencing in Robbery with Hurt Case(Feb 2004)
M Ravi and Co0.00% success rate	1 cases20.0% of area	0.00% success rate	M Ravi (1 cases)	Phua Song Hua v Public Prosecutor: Rioting Conviction and Sentencing Appeal(Feb 2004)
Eugene Thuraisingam LLP0.00% success rate	1 cases20.0% of area	0.00% success rate	Suang Wijaya (1 cases) Eugene Thuraisingam (1 cases)	Hishamrudin bin Mohd v Public Prosecutor: Reopening of Concluded Criminal Appeals and Abuse of Process(Mar 2018)

Notable Lawyers

Leading lawyers practicing in Identification Evidence, ranked by case volume and success rates.

Lawyer	Cases	Success Rate	Expertise Level	Recent Cases
Anandan Bala100.00% success rate	1 cases20.0% of area	100.00% success rate	General Practice10% relevance score	Hishamrudin bin Mohd v Public Prosecutor: Reopening of Concluded Criminal Appeals and Abuse of Process(Mar 2018)
Teo Siu Ming100.00% success rate	1 cases20.0% of area	100.00% success rate	General Practice40% relevance score	Mohammad Rizwan v Public Prosecutor: Drug Trafficking, Abetment, Adducing Fresh Evidence(May 2020)
Rakesh s/o Pokkan Vasu0.00% success rate	1 cases20.0% of area	0.00% success rate	General Practice40% relevance score	Mohammad Rizwan v Public Prosecutor: Drug Trafficking, Abetment, Adducing Fresh Evidence(May 2020)
Chan Yi Cheng100.00% success rate	1 cases20.0% of area	100.00% success rate	General Practice40% relevance score	Mohammad Rizwan v Public Prosecutor: Drug Trafficking, Abetment, Adducing Fresh Evidence(May 2020)
Nevinjit Singh J0.00% success rate	1 cases20.0% of area	0.00% success rate	General Practice40% relevance score	Mohammad Rizwan v Public Prosecutor: Drug Trafficking, Abetment, Adducing Fresh Evidence(May 2020)
Ng Yiwen100.00% success rate	1 cases20.0% of area	100.00% success rate	General Practice10% relevance score	Sivakumar v PP: Sexual Assault, Impersonation, and Consent(Mar 2014)
Eugene Thuraisingam0.00% success rate	1 cases20.0% of area	0.00% success rate	General Practice10% relevance score	Hishamrudin bin Mohd v Public Prosecutor: Reopening of Concluded Criminal Appeals and Abuse of Process(Mar 2018)
A Rajandran25.00% success rate	1 cases20.0% of area	25.00% success rate	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Govindaraj Perumalsamy v PP: Identification Parade Irregularities and Sentencing in Robbery with Hurt Case(Feb 2004)
Mohamed Faizal SC100.00% success rate	1 cases20.0% of area	100.00% success rate	General Practice40% relevance score	Mohammad Rizwan v Public Prosecutor: Drug Trafficking, Abetment, Adducing Fresh Evidence(May 2020)
Suang Wijaya0.00% success rate	1 cases20.0% of area	0.00% success rate	General Practice10% relevance score	Hishamrudin bin Mohd v Public Prosecutor: Reopening of Concluded Criminal Appeals and Abuse of Process(Mar 2018)

Recent Judgments

Displaying 5 most recent judgments out of 5 total cases

No.	Title	Court	Decision Date	Outcomes
1	Mohammad Rizwan v Public Prosecutor: Drug Trafficking, Abetment, Adducing Fresh Evidence	Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore	07 May 2020	Appeals dismissed.
2	Hishamrudin bin Mohd v Public Prosecutor: Reopening of Concluded Criminal Appeals and Abuse of Process	Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore	14 Mar 2018	Criminal motion dismissed in its entirety.
3	Sivakumar v PP: Sexual Assault, Impersonation, and Consent	Court of Appeal	12 Mar 2014	Appeal against conviction dismissed; appeal against acquittal allowed.
4	Phua Song Hua v Public Prosecutor: Rioting Conviction and Sentencing Appeal	High Court	23 Feb 2004	Appeal dismissed.
5	Govindaraj Perumalsamy v PP: Identification Parade Irregularities and Sentencing in Robbery with Hurt Case	High Court	03 Feb 2004	First, second and fourth appellants’ appeal against conviction and sentence dismissed. Third appellant’s appeal allowed.