Non est factum
Non est factum is a specialized practice area in Singapore's legal system. This area encompasses 22 cases from 2003 to 2025.
Leading Law Firms
Analysis of law firms specializing in Non est factum, ranked by case volume and success rates.
Law Firm | Cases |
---|---|
Allen & Gledhill LLP100.00% success rate | 3 cases13.6% of area |
Selvam LLC0.00% success rate | 2 cases9.1% of area |
Straits Law Practice LLC0.00% success rate | 2 cases9.1% of area |
Legal Standard LLP0.00% success rate | 2 cases9.1% of area |
Mallal & Namazie0.00% success rate | 2 cases9.1% of area |
Dentons Rodyk & Davidson LLP100.00% success rate | 1 cases4.5% of area |
Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP0.00% success rate | 1 cases4.5% of area |
WongPartnership LLP100.00% success rate | 1 cases4.5% of area |
I.R.B Law LLP0.00% success rate | 1 cases4.5% of area |
Drew & Napier LLC0.00% success rate | 1 cases4.5% of area |
Notable Lawyers
Leading lawyers practicing in Non est factum, ranked by case volume and success rates.
Lawyer | Cases |
---|---|
Letchamanan Devadason0.00% success rate | 3 cases13.6% of area |
Tan Teng Muan0.00% success rate | 2 cases9.1% of area |
Sarbjit Singh Chopra0.00% success rate | 2 cases9.1% of area |
Loh Li Qin0.00% success rate | 2 cases9.1% of area |
Mahtani Bhagwandas0.00% success rate | 2 cases9.1% of area |
Ho May Kim0.00% success rate | 2 cases9.1% of area |
Chong Jia Hao0.00% success rate | 2 cases9.1% of area |
N Sreenivasan0.00% success rate | 2 cases9.1% of area |
Sunil Sudheesan100.00% success rate | 1 cases4.5% of area |
Eugene Singarajah Thuraisingam0.00% success rate | 1 cases4.5% of area |
Recent Judgments
Displaying 22 most recent judgments out of 22 total cases
No. | Title | Court | Decision Date | Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Che’som Binti Abdullah v Qurratu Ain Binti Mohamed Yusope: Undue Influence in Property Transfer Dispute | General Division of the High Court | 16 Jan 2025 | Claim Dismissed |
2 | - | 03 Nov 2024 | Unknown | |
3 | Ng Chee Tian v Ng Chee Pong: Unjust Enrichment, Limitation Act & Proprietary Remedies Dispute | General Division of the High Court of the Republic of Singapore | 03 Sep 2024 | Appeal dismissed. |
4 | BGC Partners v Sumit Grover: Non est factum, Contractual Terms & Termination in Employment Law | General Division of the High Court of the Republic of Singapore | 12 Aug 2024 | Judgment for Plaintiffs |
5 | Public Prosecutor v JCS: Statutory Rape, Sexual Penetration of a Minor, and Rioting | General Division of the High Court of the Republic of Singapore | 03 Jul 2024 | Appeal Allowed |
6 | Thamby Kannu Parvathi v S Geetha: Estate Distribution Dispute over Dunlop Street Property Sale Proceeds | GENERAL DIVISION OF THE high court of the republic of singapore | 30 Oct 2022 | Judgment for Plaintiff |
7 | North Star (S) Capital Pte Ltd v Megatrucare Pte Ltd: Illegality of Loan Guarantee & Mental Capacity | General Division of the High Court | 05 May 2021 | Plaintiff's claim dismissed; second defendant's counterclaim granted for a declaration that the Guarantee is unenforceable under section 14(2)(a) of the Moneylenders Act. |
8 | Yusoff Shah v Taufiq Abdul Halim: Setting Aside Default Judgment for Debt Acknowledgment | General Division of the High Court | 25 Apr 2021 | Application dismissed. |
9 | Liew Kum Chong v SVM International Trading: Sham Transaction, Mistake, Non Est Factum, Unconscionability, Illegal Moneylending | High Court | 10 Jul 2019 | Judgment for Plaintiff |
10 | Ram Niranjan v Navin Jatia: Costs Allocation in Breach of Contract & Minority Oppression Suit | High Court of Singapore | 06 Jun 2019 | Costs orders made, with reductions due to failure to prove substantial claims and allegations. |
11 | Ram Niranjan v Navin Jatia: Minority Oppression, Contractual Disputes, and Property Rights | High Court | 28 May 2019 | Ram and Mrs Ram succeeded in some but not all of their claims in Suit 911. Navin’s counterclaim was dismissed, as was his claim in Suit 139. |
12 | CRRC v Chen Weiping: Summary Judgment on Guarantee & Striking Out Counterclaim | High Court of the Republic of Singapore | 28 Apr 2019 | Summary judgment granted against the defendant; counterclaim struck out. |
13 | OCBC v. Yeo Hui Keng: Non Est Factum & All-Moneys Mortgage Dispute | High Court of Singapore | 27 Feb 2019 | Judgment for Plaintiff; Defendant's counterclaim dismissed; Defendant's claim against Third Party dismissed. |
14 | Chan Gek Yong v Violet Netto: Striking Out Claim for Professional Negligence and Breach of Trust After Settlement Agreement | High Court of Singapore | 19 Sep 2018 | Appeals dismissed. |
15 | Ramesh v AXA Life: Negligence, Duty of Care, and Employer References | Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore | 26 Jul 2016 | Appeal Allowed in Part |
16 | Goh Eileen v Goh Mei Ling: Undue Influence & Transfer of HDB Flat Title Dispute | High Court | 09 Jan 2014 | Claim Dismissed |
17 | World Sport Group v Dorsey James Michael: Pre-Action Interrogatories & Defamation | High Court | 09 Apr 2013 | Appeal allowed in part. The defendant had to answer interrogatories nos 1, 2(a), 2(b), 2(c), 6 and 6.1. |
18 | OCBC v Frankel Motor: Setting Aside Default Judgment & Non Est Factum Defense | High Court | 30 Mar 2009 | Appeal dismissed with costs. |
19 | UOB v Bebe bte Mohammad: Mortgage Indefeasibility & Fraud under Land Titles Act | Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore | 24 Sep 2006 | Appeal Allowed |
20 | Tan Kay Beng v PP: Theft & Criminal Intimidation Sentencing Appeal | High Court | 06 Jul 2006 | Appeal Allowed |
21 | Standard Chartered Bank v Uniden Systems: Wife's Guarantee & Undue Influence | High Court | 27 Apr 2003 | Judgment for Plaintiff |
22 | Elan Impex v Daewoo: Wrongful Termination, Service Out of Jurisdiction, and Forum Non Conveniens | High Court | 07 Feb 2003 | Action against the first defendant and fourth defendant struck out; orders giving leave to serve outside jurisdiction set aside; interim injunctions discharged; claim against the third defendant and the Mareva injunction against him stayed. |