Piercing corporate veil

Piercing corporate veil is a specialized practice area in Singapore's legal system. This area encompasses 6 cases from 2007 to 2020.

Leading Law Firms

Analysis of law firms specializing in Piercing corporate veil, ranked by case volume and success rates.

Law FirmCases
WongPartnership LLP50.00% success rate2 cases33.3% of area
Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP0.00% success rate1 cases16.7% of area
Mallal & Namazie100.00% success rate1 cases16.7% of area
Engelin Teh Practice LLC0.00% success rate1 cases16.7% of area
Haridass Ho & Partners0.00% success rate1 cases16.7% of area
Foo & Quek LLC100.00% success rate1 cases16.7% of area
NLC Law Asia LLC100.00% success rate1 cases16.7% of area
Rajah & Tann0.00% success rate1 cases16.7% of area
Allen & Gledhill0.00% success rate1 cases16.7% of area
Rajah and Tann Singapore LLP0.00% success rate1 cases16.7% of area

Notable Lawyers

Leading lawyers practicing in Piercing corporate veil, ranked by case volume and success rates.

LawyerCases
Kelvin Poon0.00% success rate1 cases16.7% of area
Koh Swee Yen0.00% success rate1 cases16.7% of area
Vikram Nair0.00% success rate1 cases16.7% of area
Tay Yong Seng0.00% success rate1 cases16.7% of area
Sim Kwan Kiat0.00% success rate1 cases16.7% of area
Ang Cheng Hock0.00% success rate1 cases16.7% of area
Ng Lip Chih100.00% success rate1 cases16.7% of area
Andrew Ong0.00% success rate1 cases16.7% of area
Kenneth Tan100.00% success rate1 cases16.7% of area
Loong Tse Chuan0.00% success rate1 cases16.7% of area

Recent Judgments

Displaying 6 most recent judgments out of 6 total cases

No.TitleCourtDecision DateOutcomes
1Godhwani v Godhwani: Breach of Trust & Misappropriation of Inheritance FundsHigh Court of the Republic of Singapore21 Jul 2020
Claim partially allowed.
2Sun Electric v Menrva Solutions: Breach of Contract, Negligence, and Privity of ContractCourt of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore25 Sep 2019
Appeal Dismissed
3-07 Feb 2018
Unknown
4Bunge SA v Indian Bank: Forum Non Conveniens & Breach of UndertakingHigh Court29 Dec 2015
Singapore proceedings stayed in favour of India as the more appropriate forum.
5Boustead Singapore Ltd v Arab Banking Corp: Fraud, Demand Guarantees & UnconscionabilityHigh Court10 Mar 2015
Judgment for Plaintiff; ABC is injuncted from receiving payment from Boustead under the facility agreement demand and is injuncted from making payment to BCD on BCD’s counter-guarantee demands. The event-of-default notice is invalid.
6Beckkett v Deutsche Bank: Duty of Pledgee, Undervalue Sale of Shares, and Conspiracy ClaimHigh Court20 Sep 2007
Judgment for Plaintiff in part; nominal damages awarded. Claim for conspiracy dismissed. Defendant's counterclaim dismissed.