Privacy

Privacy is a specialized practice area in Singapore's legal system. This area encompasses 4 cases from 2003 to 2024.

Leading Law Firms

Analysis of law firms specializing in Privacy, ranked by case volume and success rates.

Law FirmCases
Straits Law Practice LLC0.00% success rate2 cases50.0% of area
WongPartnership LLP50.00% success rate2 cases50.0% of area
Drew and Napier LLC0.00% success rate1 cases25.0% of area
Lim & Lim100.00% success rate1 cases25.0% of area
KhattarWong LLP0.00% success rate1 cases25.0% of area
Rodyk & Davidson100.00% success rate1 cases25.0% of area
Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP100.00% success rate1 cases25.0% of area

Notable Lawyers

Leading lawyers practicing in Privacy, ranked by case volume and success rates.

LawyerCases
N Sreenivasan0.00% success rate2 cases50.0% of area
Koh Swee Yen100.00% success rate1 cases25.0% of area
Thawdar Soe Moe @ The Sandi Tun100.00% success rate1 cases25.0% of area
Chang Man Phing Jenny0.00% success rate1 cases25.0% of area
Goh Sher Hwyn Rebecca0.00% success rate1 cases25.0% of area
Ho Pei Shien Melanie0.00% success rate1 cases25.0% of area
Cavinder Bull0.00% success rate1 cases25.0% of area
Louis Lau Yi Hang100.00% success rate1 cases25.0% of area
Lin Shumin0.00% success rate1 cases25.0% of area
Devathas Satianathan100.00% success rate1 cases25.0% of area

Recent Judgments

Displaying 4 most recent judgments out of 4 total cases

No.TitleCourtDecision DateOutcomes
1Tilani v Koedijk: Arbitration Confidentiality & Court's Inherent PowersCourt of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore29 Oct 2024
Application dismissed.
2Republic of India v. Deutsche Telekom AG: Arbitration Confidentiality & PrivacyCourt of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore08 Jun 2023
Appeal Dismissed
3World Sport Group v Dorsey James Michael: Pre-Action Interrogatories & DefamationHigh Court09 Apr 2013
Appeal allowed in part. The defendant had to answer interrogatories nos 1, 2(a), 2(b), 2(c), 6 and 6.1.
4Elan Impex v Daewoo: Wrongful Termination, Service Out of Jurisdiction, and Forum Non ConveniensHigh Court07 Feb 2003
Action against the first defendant and fourth defendant struck out; orders giving leave to serve outside jurisdiction set aside; interim injunctions discharged; claim against the third defendant and the Mareva injunction against him stayed.