Variations

Variations is a specialized practice area in Singapore's legal system. This area encompasses 11 cases from 2016 to 2023.

Leading Law Firms

Analysis of law firms specializing in Variations, ranked by case volume and success rates.

Law FirmCases
Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP50.00% success rate2 cases18.2% of area
TSMP Law Corporation0.00% success rate2 cases18.2% of area
Zenith Law Corporation0.00% success rate2 cases18.2% of area
Mallal & Namazie50.00% success rate2 cases18.2% of area
Rajwin & Yong LLP0.00% success rate1 cases9.1% of area
LVM Law Chambers LLC100.00% success rate1 cases9.1% of area
Dentons Rodyk & Davidson LLP0.00% success rate1 cases9.1% of area
Bird & Bird ATMD LLP0.00% success rate1 cases9.1% of area
Damodara Ong LLC0.00% success rate1 cases9.1% of area
Infinitus Law Corporation0.00% success rate1 cases9.1% of area

Notable Lawyers

Leading lawyers practicing in Variations, ranked by case volume and success rates.

LawyerCases
Namazie Mirza Mohamed50.00% success rate2 cases18.2% of area
Kris Chew Yee Fong0.00% success rate2 cases18.2% of area
Jasmine Thng Khai Fang0.00% success rate1 cases9.1% of area
Devathas Satianathan100.00% success rate1 cases9.1% of area
Ning Jie0.00% success rate1 cases9.1% of area
Ong Ziying Clement0.00% success rate1 cases9.1% of area
Ng Shu Wen100.00% success rate1 cases9.1% of area
Low Zhe Ning0.00% success rate1 cases9.1% of area
Luo Ling Ling0.00% success rate1 cases9.1% of area
Chan Kah Keen Melvin0.00% success rate1 cases9.1% of area

Recent Judgments

Displaying 11 most recent judgments out of 11 total cases

No.TitleCourtDecision DateOutcomes
1Pro-Active Engineering v Prime Structures: Building Contract Dispute over Delay & Back ChargesHigh Court of the Republic of Singapore30 Jul 2023
Judgment for Plaintiff in part.
2Diamond Glass v Zhong Kai: Liquidated Damages, Variations & Building LawAppellate Division of the High Court30 May 2023
Appeals allowed in part; supplementary orders made regarding costs and payments.
3Vim Engineering v Deluge Fire Protection: Construction Contract Dispute over Variation Works and Back-ChargesAppellate Division of the High Court11 Jan 2023
Appeal Allowed in Part
4ICOP Construction v. Tiong Seng: Microtunnelling Dispute over Contract Termination and Delay ClaimsGeneral Division of the High Court of the Republic of Singapore11 Oct 2022
Judgment partially for Plaintiff, ICOP Construction, and partially for Defendant, Tiong Seng Civil Engineering; Quantum Hearing ordered.
5Zhong Kai Construction v Diamond Glass: Liquidated Damages & SOPA DisputeGeneral Division of the High Court01 Dec 2021
Plaintiff's claims for liquidated damages and replacement/rectification works allowed in part; three variation orders in the adjudication determination set aside; one of the defendant's claim for variation order allowed; defendant's other claims dismissed.
6CJY v CJZ: Stay of Court Proceedings Pending Arbitration Over Wrongful Performance Bond Calls and Construction DefectsGeneral Division of the High Court22 Mar 2021
Case management stay granted, suit stayed pending the determination of the arbitration.
7Vim Engineering v Deluge Fire Protection: Variation Claims & Written InstructionsGeneral Division of the High Court21 Mar 2021
Judgment for Defendant
8Comfort Management v OGSP Engineering: Building Contract Dispute over Lump Sum Contract and Sub-contractor ClaimsHigh Court of the Republic of Singapore05 Aug 2020
Judgment for Plaintiff in part and Judgment for First Defendant in part; Plaintiff's claim against Second Defendant dismissed.
9PEX International v Lim Seng Chye: Nuisance, Rylands v Fletcher & ForeseeabilityCourt of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore18 Dec 2019
Both appeals dismissed. The court upheld the High Court's decision that PEX was liable in nuisance and under the rule in Rylands v Fletcher, but clarified the role of foreseeability in these torts.
10Wei Siang v Euro Assets: Building Renovation, Conservation Guidelines & NegligenceHigh Court of Singapore22 Aug 2018
Judgment for Plaintiff on claim in respect of variation works done to install an additional rainwater drop pipe. All of the contractor’s remaining claims against the owner are dismissed. The contractor, the architect, and the engineer are all liable to the owner in respect of the deviations to: (i) the second and third storey rear slabs; (ii) the rear roof slab; and (iii) the rear external staircase; (b) The contractor and the architect, but not the engineer, are liable to the owner for the deviation at the rear boundary wall. The quantum of damages payable to the owner by these three parties will be assessed separately. As against the owner, however, the three parties are jointly and severally liable for the whole of the owner’s loss.
11Geocon Piling v Multistar: Construction Subcontract Dispute over KPE Bored Piling WorksHigh Court of the Republic of Singapore30 Oct 2016
Judgment for Plaintiff in part.