Kiri Industries Ltd

Kiri Industries Ltd is a corporation in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 14 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 19 counsels. Through 1 law firm. Their track record shows a 28.6% success rate in resolved cases. They have been involved in 1 complex case, representing 7.1% of their total caseload.

Legal Representation

Kiri Industries Ltd has been represented by 1 law firm and 19 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
Allen & Gledhill LLP	5 cases	Dhillon Dinesh Singh Loong Tse Chuan Lim Dao Kai Mak Sushan Melissa Dhivya Rajendra Naidu Chee Yi Wen Serene Jung Sol Wong Pei Ting Rajan Sanjiv Kumar Prabu Devaraj s/o Raman Toh Jia Yi Margaret Joan Ling Wei Wei Dinesh Dhillon Singh Serene Chee Yi Wen Dinesh Dhillon Margaret Joan Ling Dhivya Naidu Teh Shi Ying Han Jiajun

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Kiri Industries Ltd's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.1
Complex Cases: 1 (7.1%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	33.0 parties avg	3.0	21.4%
Neutral	13.0 parties avg	3.0	7.1%
Partial	63.2 parties avg	3.2	42.9%
Won	43.0 parties avg	3.0	28.6%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2024	43.3 parties avg	3.3
2023	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2022	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2021	53.0 parties avg	3.0
2020	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Kiri Industries Ltd's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	3(21.4%)	21.4%
Neutral	1(7.1%)	7.1%
Partial	6(42.9%)	42.9%
Won	4(28.6%)	28.6%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	9,732,798.52	1,946,559.705 cases	5
USD	1,689,200,000.00	563,066,666.673 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2024	2 13	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 3 cases (150.0%)
2023	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2022	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2021	3 212	Lost: 2 cases (66.7%) Neutral: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 2 cases (66.7%)
2020	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 14 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2024-sghci-25 28 Aug 2024	28 Aug 2024	Plaintiff	PartialSenda to pay costs in the sum of S$360,050.
2	2024-sghci-15 27 May 2024	27 May 2024	Plaintiff	LostApplication to vary or discharge the order setting aside the service out order was dismissed.
3	2024-sghci-14 19 May 2024	19 May 2024	Plaintiff	PartialKiri Industries will receive US$603.8 million from the proceeds of the en bloc sale of shares in DyStar, in priority to Senda International Capital Ltd.
4	2024-sghci-7 26 Mar 2024	26 Mar 2024	Plaintiff	PartialThe court upheld the examination order but set aside the order granting leave to serve Ms. Fan out of jurisdiction, and consequently, the substituted service order. The court also set aside the order granting leave to serve Mr. Ruan out of jurisdiction, subject to any application made within 10 days by the parties or either of them to vary or discharge the order.
5	2023-sghci-4 02 Mar 2023	02 Mar 2023	Plaintiff	WonFinal valuation of Kiri’s shares adjudged to be US$603.8m for the buy-out order.
6	2023-sghci-3 07 Feb 2023	07 Feb 2023	Plaintiff	PartialCourt determined the annual tonnage of related products produced by Longsheng to be 56,750 tonnes, with 53,550 tonnes used for notional license fee calculation.
7	2022-sgcai-10 24 Nov 2022	24 Nov 2022	Respondent, Plaintiff	WonKiri was awarded S$123,250 as its “reasonable costs” of this appeal under O 110 r 46(2) of the ROC 2014. Kiri was also allowed to recover disbursements of S$7,928.61 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
8	2022-sgcai-5 05 Jul 2022	05 Jul 2022	Appellant, Applicant, Plaintiff, Respondent	PartialAppeal allowed in part regarding DLOM and notional license fee. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
9	2021-sghci-18 26 Dec 2021	26 Dec 2021	Plaintiff	LostKiri's application to make Longsheng jointly and severally liable for Senda's costs was denied. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
10	2021-sghci-16 07 Dec 2021	07 Dec 2021	Plaintiff	WonCosts of S$4,960,815.26 and disbursements of S$3,100,826.85 awarded to Kiri Industries Ltd (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
11	2021-sghci-12 23 Sep 2021	23 Sep 2021	Defendant	LostCounterclaim dismissed; Kiri to pay DyStar's costs of SGD 1,137,856.41 (all-in). Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
12	2021-sghci-6 20 Jun 2021	20 Jun 2021	Plaintiff	WonFinal valuation of Kiri's shares adjudged to be US$481.6m.
13	2021-sghci-2 02 Jun 2021	02 Jun 2021	Plaintiff	NeutralShares in DyStar Global Holdings (Singapore) Pte Ltd to be valued (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
14	2020-sghci-27 20 Dec 2020	20 Dec 2020	Plaintiff	PartialSenda International Capital Ltd was ordered to purchase Kiri Industries Ltd’s shares in DyStar Global Holdings (Singapore) Pte Ltd. The final amount is to be determined based on the adjustments outlined in the judgment. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.