Anton Piller Order

Anton Piller Order is a specialized practice area in Singapore's legal system. This area encompasses 6 cases from 2002 to 2021.

Leading Law Firms

Analysis of law firms specializing in Anton Piller Order, ranked by case volume and success rates.

Law Firm	Cases	Success Rate	Key Lawyers	Recent Cases
Allen & Gledhill LLP100.00% success rate	1 cases16.7% of area	100.00% success rate	Afzal Ali (1 cases) Ong Min-Tse Paul (1 cases) Marrissa Miralini Karuna (1 cases)	VKC v VJZ: Anti-Suit Injunction & Exclusive Jurisdiction in Estate Dispute(Jul 2021)
Shook Lin & Bok LLP100.00% success rate	1 cases16.7% of area	100.00% success rate	Joseph Tay Weiwen (1 cases) Tan Aik Thong (1 cases) Claire Yeo (1 cases)	Peh Yeng Yok v Tembusu Systems: Setting Aside Anton Piller Order in Minority Oppression Suit(Mar 2016)
Mallal & Namazie0.00% success rate	1 cases16.7% of area	0.00% success rate	Chua Boon Beng (1 cases) Tan Teng Muan (1 cases) Loh Li Qin (1 cases)	Macs Associates v. Siew Kang Yoke: Setting Aside Anton Piller Order for Breach of Confidence(Sep 2021)
Harry Elias Partnership LLP0.00% success rate	1 cases16.7% of area	0.00% success rate	Philip Fong Yeng Fatt (1 cases) Tan Yong Seng Nicklaus (1 cases) Kevin Lim Meng Ern (1 cases)	Peh Yeng Yok v Tembusu Systems: Setting Aside Anton Piller Order in Minority Oppression Suit(Mar 2016)
Withers KhattarWong LLP100.00% success rate	1 cases16.7% of area	100.00% success rate	Deborah Barker (1 cases) Amarjit Kaur (1 cases) Jayna Tan Yi Hui (1 cases)	Macs Associates v. Siew Kang Yoke: Setting Aside Anton Piller Order for Breach of Confidence(Sep 2021)
August Law Corporation100.00% success rate	1 cases16.7% of area	100.00% success rate	Adrian Tan (1 cases)	Peh Yeng Yok v Tembusu Systems: Setting Aside Anton Piller Order in Minority Oppression Suit(Mar 2016)
ACIES Law Corporation0.00% success rate	1 cases16.7% of area	0.00% success rate	Leong Wen Jia Nicholas (1 cases) Devinder Kumar s/o Ram Sakal Rai (1 cases)	VKC v VJZ: Anti-Suit Injunction & Exclusive Jurisdiction in Estate Dispute(Jul 2021)
Daisy Yeo & Co.0.00% success rate	1 cases16.7% of area	0.00% success rate	Harbajan Singh (1 cases) Ronald Lee (1 cases)	Lim Eng Beng v Siow Soon Kim: Application for Stay of Execution Pending Appeal(Jul 2003)
Rajah and Tann0.00% success rate	1 cases16.7% of area	0.00% success rate	Francis Xavier (1 cases) Julian Soong (1 cases) Sangeeta Subrahmanyam (1 cases)	CHS CPO GmbH v Vikas Goel: Fortification of Undertakings for Mareva Injunction & Anton Piller Order(Apr 2005)
Khattar Wong and Partners0.00% success rate	1 cases16.7% of area	0.00% success rate	Chan Kia Pheng (1 cases) Shaun Koh (1 cases)	CHS CPO GmbH v Vikas Goel: Fortification of Undertakings for Mareva Injunction & Anton Piller Order(Apr 2005)

Notable Lawyers

Leading lawyers practicing in Anton Piller Order, ranked by case volume and success rates.

Lawyer	Cases	Success Rate	Expertise Level	Recent Cases
Joseph Tay Weiwen100.00% success rate	1 cases16.7% of area	100.00% success rate	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Peh Yeng Yok v Tembusu Systems: Setting Aside Anton Piller Order in Minority Oppression Suit(Mar 2016)
Leong Wen Jia Nicholas0.00% success rate	1 cases16.7% of area	0.00% success rate	General Practice10% relevance score	VKC v VJZ: Anti-Suit Injunction & Exclusive Jurisdiction in Estate Dispute(Jul 2021)
Afzal Ali100.00% success rate	1 cases16.7% of area	100.00% success rate	General Practice10% relevance score	VKC v VJZ: Anti-Suit Injunction & Exclusive Jurisdiction in Estate Dispute(Jul 2021)
Deborah Barker100.00% success rate	1 cases16.7% of area	100.00% success rate	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Macs Associates v. Siew Kang Yoke: Setting Aside Anton Piller Order for Breach of Confidence(Sep 2021)
Samuel Chacko0.00% success rate	1 cases16.7% of area	0.00% success rate	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	CHS CPO GmbH v Vikas Goel: Fortification of Undertakings for Mareva Injunction & Anton Piller Order(Apr 2005)
A Rajandran0.00% success rate	1 cases16.7% of area	0.00% success rate	Experienced50% relevance score	Lim Eng Beng v Siow Soon Kim: Application for Stay of Execution Pending Appeal(Jul 2003)
Foo Soon Yien0.00% success rate	1 cases16.7% of area	0.00% success rate	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	National Scientific v Ho Wai Ming: Anton Piller Orders & Breach of Fiduciary Duty(Apr 2002)
Tan Teng Muan0.00% success rate	1 cases16.7% of area	0.00% success rate	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Macs Associates v. Siew Kang Yoke: Setting Aside Anton Piller Order for Breach of Confidence(Sep 2021)
Loh Li Qin0.00% success rate	1 cases16.7% of area	0.00% success rate	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Macs Associates v. Siew Kang Yoke: Setting Aside Anton Piller Order for Breach of Confidence(Sep 2021)
Chua Boon Beng0.00% success rate	1 cases16.7% of area	0.00% success rate	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Macs Associates v. Siew Kang Yoke: Setting Aside Anton Piller Order for Breach of Confidence(Sep 2021)

Recent Judgments

Displaying 6 most recent judgments out of 6 total cases

No.	Title	Court	Decision Date	Outcomes
1	Macs Associates v. Siew Kang Yoke: Setting Aside Anton Piller Order for Breach of Confidence	General Division of the High Court	12 Sep 2021	Anton Piller Order set aside.
2	VKC v VJZ: Anti-Suit Injunction & Exclusive Jurisdiction in Estate Dispute	Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore	28 Jul 2021	Appeal Dismissed
3	Peh Yeng Yok v Tembusu Systems: Setting Aside Anton Piller Order in Minority Oppression Suit	High Court of the Republic of Singapore	14 Mar 2016	Search order set aside against all defendants.
4	CHS CPO GmbH v Vikas Goel: Fortification of Undertakings for Mareva Injunction & Anton Piller Order	High Court	25 Apr 2005	Application allowed in part.
5	Lim Eng Beng v Siow Soon Kim: Application for Stay of Execution Pending Appeal	High Court	16 Jul 2003	Application for stay of execution granted in part; extension granted for document delivery, payment already made.
6	National Scientific v Ho Wai Ming: Anton Piller Orders & Breach of Fiduciary Duty	High Court	10 Apr 2002	No order made on the first defendant's application to discharge or vary the Anton Piller orders; costs of the application be costs in the cause.