Apparent bias

Apparent bias is a specialized practice area in Singapore's legal system. This area encompasses 16 cases from 2003 to 2024.

Leading Law Firms

Analysis of law firms specializing in Apparent bias, ranked by case volume and success rates.

Law Firm	Cases	Success Rate	Key Lawyers	Recent Cases
Attorney-General’s Chambers50.00% success rate	2 cases12.5% of area	50.00% success rate	Jiang Ke-Yue (1 cases) Etsuko Lim (1 cases) Senthilkumaran Sabapathy (1 cases)	Lin Haifeng v Public Prosecutor: Criminal Review Application and Judge Recusal(Jan 2024) Newton v Public Prosecutor: Cheating, COVID-19 Vaccination, and Sentencing Appeal(Sep 2023)
Straits Law Practice LLC0.00% success rate	2 cases12.5% of area	0.00% success rate	N Sreenivasan (2 cases) Sujatha Selvakumar (1 cases) Bal Ratanesh Kaur (1 cases)	World Sport Group v Dorsey James Michael: Pre-Action Interrogatories & Defamation(Apr 2013) Elan Impex v Daewoo: Wrongful Termination, Service Out of Jurisdiction, and Forum Non Conveniens(Feb 2003)
TSMP Law Corporation100.00% success rate	1 cases6.3% of area	100.00% success rate	Kevin Elbert (1 cases) Thio Shen Yi (1 cases) Niklas Wong (1 cases)	BYL v BYN: Setting Aside of ICC Partial Award Due to Put Option Reliefs and Arbitrator Bias(Mar 2020)
Nine Yards Chambers LLC100.00% success rate	1 cases6.3% of area	100.00% success rate	Nichol Yeo (1 cases)	DJK v DJN: Setting Aside Arbitral Award for Apparent Bias in Loan Agreement Dispute(Dec 2024)
Cavenagh Law LLP0.00% success rate	1 cases6.3% of area	0.00% success rate	Kabir Singh (1 cases) Sivanathan Jheevanesh (1 cases) Davinder Singh (1 cases)	BYL v BYN: Setting Aside of ICC Partial Award Due to Put Option Reliefs and Arbitrator Bias(Mar 2020)
T L Yap Law Chambers LLC100.00% success rate	1 cases6.3% of area	100.00% success rate	Yap Teong Liang (1 cases) Tan Hui Qing (1 cases)	TOW v TOV: Recusal of Judge in Ancillary Matters After Adverse Findings in Prior Protection Order Hearing(Dec 2016)
Independent Practitioner0.00% success rate	1 cases6.3% of area	0.00% success rate	Anthony Wee (1 cases)	Wee Soon Kim Anthony v UBS AG: Application to Set Aside Judgment Based on Judicial Bias(May 2007)
LVM Law Chambers LLC0.00% success rate	1 cases6.3% of area	0.00% success rate	Lok Vi Ming (1 cases) Joseph Lee (1 cases) Michelle Yeo (1 cases)	Lin Haifeng v Public Prosecutor: Criminal Review Application and Judge Recusal(Jan 2024)
Tan & Au LLP0.00% success rate	1 cases6.3% of area	0.00% success rate	Tan Beng Hui Carolyn (1 cases)	Dhir v Management Corp: Recusal Application Based on Alleged Bias in Property Dispute(Apr 2021)
WongPartnership LLP0.00% success rate	1 cases6.3% of area	0.00% success rate	Paul Loy Chi Syann (1 cases) Yii Li-Huei Adelle (1 cases)	Newton v Public Prosecutor: Cheating, COVID-19 Vaccination, and Sentencing Appeal(Sep 2023)

Notable Lawyers

Leading lawyers practicing in Apparent bias, ranked by case volume and success rates.

Lawyer	Cases	Success Rate	Expertise Level	Recent Cases
N Sreenivasan0.00% success rate	2 cases12.5% of area	0.00% success rate	General Practice20% relevance score	World Sport Group v Dorsey James Michael: Pre-Action Interrogatories & Defamation(Apr 2013) Elan Impex v Daewoo: Wrongful Termination, Service Out of Jurisdiction, and Forum Non Conveniens(Feb 2003)
Khoo Boo Jin100.00% success rate	1 cases6.3% of area	100.00% success rate	Experienced70% relevance score	Manjit Singh v Attorney-General: Judicial Review of Disciplinary Tribunal Appointment(Mar 2013)
Sheryl Koh0.00% success rate	1 cases6.3% of area	0.00% success rate	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	DJK v DJN: Setting Aside Arbitral Award for Apparent Bias in Loan Agreement Dispute(Dec 2024)
Jiang Ke-Yue0.00% success rate	1 cases6.3% of area	0.00% success rate	Experienced60% relevance score	Newton v Public Prosecutor: Cheating, COVID-19 Vaccination, and Sentencing Appeal(Sep 2023)
Tay Yong Seng0.00% success rate	1 cases6.3% of area	0.00% success rate	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Raffles Town Club v Comptroller of Income Tax: Judicial Review of Income Tax Board of Review Appointment(Mar 2008)
Clarence Lun Yaodong0.00% success rate	1 cases6.3% of area	0.00% success rate	Experienced60% relevance score	Soh Rui Yong v Liew Wei Yen Ashley: Defamation Suit, Excessive Judicial Interference, Apparent Bias(Apr 2021)
Siddartha Bodi0.00% success rate	1 cases6.3% of area	0.00% success rate	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	DJK v DJN: Setting Aside Arbitral Award for Apparent Bias in Loan Agreement Dispute(Dec 2024)
Colin Seow100.00% success rate	1 cases6.3% of area	100.00% success rate	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	DJK v DJN: Setting Aside Arbitral Award for Apparent Bias in Loan Agreement Dispute(Dec 2024)
Violet Huang100.00% success rate	1 cases6.3% of area	100.00% success rate	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	DJK v DJN: Setting Aside Arbitral Award for Apparent Bias in Loan Agreement Dispute(Dec 2024)
Anthony Wee0.00% success rate	1 cases6.3% of area	0.00% success rate	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Wee Soon Kim Anthony v UBS AG: Application to Set Aside Judgment Based on Judicial Bias(May 2007)

Recent Judgments

Displaying 16 most recent judgments out of 16 total cases

No.	Title	Court	Decision Date	Outcomes
1	DJK v DJN: Setting Aside Arbitral Award for Apparent Bias in Loan Agreement Dispute	General Division of the High Court of the Republic of Singapore	02 Dec 2024	Application dismissed
2		-	03 Nov 2024	Unknown
3	Haide Building Materials Co Ltd v Ship Recycling Investments Inc: Setting Aside Arbitration Award for Breach of Natural Justice	General Division of the High Court of the Republic of Singapore	29 Aug 2024	Application dismissed
4	Lin Haifeng v Public Prosecutor: Criminal Review Application and Judge Recusal	General Division of the High Court	31 Jan 2024	Application for recusal dismissed.
5	Newton v Public Prosecutor: Cheating, COVID-19 Vaccination, and Sentencing Appeal	General Division of the High Court	19 Sep 2023	Appeal Allowed in Part
6	Soh Rui Yong v Liew Wei Yen Ashley: Defamation Suit, Excessive Judicial Interference, Apparent Bias	General Division of the High Court of the Republic of Singapore	29 Apr 2021	Registrar's Appeal from the State Courts No 35 of 2020 and Registrar's Appeal from the State Courts No 25 of 2020 were dismissed. Registrar's Appeal from the State Courts No 24 of 2020 was allowed and the orders made in the application below were set aside.
7	Dhir v Management Corp: Recusal Application Based on Alleged Bias in Property Dispute	General Division of the High Court	21 Apr 2021	Application for recusal dismissed.
8	BYL v BYN: Setting Aside of ICC Partial Award Due to Put Option Reliefs and Arbitrator Bias	SINGAPORE INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL COURT	02 Mar 2020	Application dismissed.
9		-	03 Oct 2018	Unknown
10	TOW v TOV: Recusal of Judge in Ancillary Matters After Adverse Findings in Prior Protection Order Hearing	High Court	18 Dec 2016	Appeal dismissed.
11	World Sport Group v Dorsey James Michael: Pre-Action Interrogatories & Defamation	High Court	09 Apr 2013	Appeal allowed in part. The defendant had to answer interrogatories nos 1, 2(a), 2(b), 2(c), 6 and 6.1.
12	Manjit Singh v Attorney-General: Judicial Review of Disciplinary Tribunal Appointment	High Court	14 Mar 2013	Application dismissed with costs.
13	Raffles Town Club v Comptroller of Income Tax: Judicial Review of Income Tax Board of Review Appointment	High Court	31 Mar 2008	Application allowed in part.
14	Wee Soon Kim Anthony v UBS AG: Application to Set Aside Judgment Based on Judicial Bias	High Court	07 May 2007	Originating Summons dismissed.
15	Tan Yeow Hiang Kenneth v Tan Chor Chuan: Review of Costs in Defamation Action	High Court	09 Nov 2005	The court decided that it did not have the power to allow a further reduction on account of the failed defenses. The court also decided that, even if it were open to it to grant a reduction, no reduction ought to be allowed.
16	Elan Impex v Daewoo: Wrongful Termination, Service Out of Jurisdiction, and Forum Non Conveniens	High Court	07 Feb 2003	Action against the first defendant and fourth defendant struck out; orders giving leave to serve outside jurisdiction set aside; interim injunctions discharged; claim against the third defendant and the Mareva injunction against him stayed.