Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 2004
Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 2004 is a specialized practice area in Singapore's legal system. This area encompasses 14 cases from 2003 to 2022.
Leading Law Firms
Analysis of law firms specializing in Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 2004, ranked by case volume and success rates.
Law Firm | Cases |
---|---|
Eldan Law LLP50.00% success rate | 2 cases14.3% of area |
Kelvin Chia Partnership50.00% success rate | 2 cases14.3% of area |
Chong Chia & Lim LLC0.00% success rate | 2 cases14.3% of area |
Legal Clinic LLC0.00% success rate | 1 cases7.1% of area |
Drew & Napier LLC100.00% success rate | 1 cases7.1% of area |
LVM Law Chambers LLC100.00% success rate | 1 cases7.1% of area |
Chancery Law Corporation0.00% success rate | 1 cases7.1% of area |
Damodara Ong LLC0.00% success rate | 1 cases7.1% of area |
Sterling Law Corporation0.00% success rate | 1 cases7.1% of area |
Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP100.00% success rate | 1 cases7.1% of area |
Notable Lawyers
Leading lawyers practicing in Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 2004, ranked by case volume and success rates.
Lawyer | Cases |
---|---|
Chong Kuan Keong0.00% success rate | 2 cases14.3% of area |
Oh Kim Heoh Mimi100.00% success rate | 2 cases14.3% of area |
Aw Wei Keng Kelvin100.00% success rate | 1 cases7.1% of area |
Ng Shu Wen100.00% success rate | 1 cases7.1% of area |
Devathas Satianathan100.00% success rate | 1 cases7.1% of area |
Tan Tian Luh0.00% success rate | 1 cases7.1% of area |
Ong Ziying Clement0.00% success rate | 1 cases7.1% of area |
Ngo Wei Shing0.00% success rate | 1 cases7.1% of area |
Ning Jie0.00% success rate | 1 cases7.1% of area |
Andy Yeo Yong Chuan0.00% success rate | 1 cases7.1% of area |
Recent Judgments
Displaying 14 most recent judgments out of 14 total cases
No. | Title | Court | Decision Date | Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | LBE Engineering v Double S Construction: Wrongful Termination in Construction Dispute | General Division of the High Court | 25 Apr 2022 | Appeal Allowed |
2 | Backho (S) Pte Ltd v KSE Marine Works Pte Ltd: SOPA Dispute over Oral Contract and Adjudication Determination | General Division of the High Court of the Republic of Singapore | 16 Jan 2022 | KSE Marine Works Pte Ltd's application to set aside the Adjudication Determination and the Order is dismissed. |
3 | CJY v CJZ: Stay of Court Proceedings Pending Arbitration Over Wrongful Performance Bond Calls and Construction Defects | General Division of the High Court | 22 Mar 2021 | Case management stay granted, suit stayed pending the determination of the arbitration. |
4 | Facade Solution v Mero Asia Pacific: Setting Aside Adjudication for Fraud under SOPA | Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore | 06 Sep 2020 | Appeal Dismissed |
5 | PEX International v Lim Seng Chye: Nuisance, Rylands v Fletcher & Foreseeability | Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore | 18 Dec 2019 | Both appeals dismissed. The court upheld the High Court's decision that PEX was liable in nuisance and under the rule in Rylands v Fletcher, but clarified the role of foreseeability in these torts. |
6 | Sito Construction v PBT Engineering: SOPA, Jurisdictional Objection & Waiver | High Court | 13 Jan 2019 | Application dismissed |
7 | Bintai Kindenko v Samsung C&T: Setting Aside Adjudication Determination for Breach of Natural Justice | Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore | 08 Jul 2018 | Appeal Dismissed |
8 | Hua Rong Engineering v Civil Tech: Security of Payment Act & Cross-Contract Set-Off | High Court of the Republic of Singapore | 23 Jul 2017 | Application to set aside the adjudication determination dismissed. |
9 | Mansource Interior v CSG Group: Overpayment Dispute in Construction Subcontracts | High Court of the Republic of Singapore | 07 Mar 2017 | Judgment for Plaintiff |
10 | CAA Technologies v HP Construction: Wrongful Termination & Banker's Guarantee Dispute | High Court | 27 Jan 2015 | Judgment for Defendant in part; Plaintiff's claim for wrongful termination dismissed. Defendant's counterclaim allowed in part. |
11 | Rotol Projects v CCM Industrial: Sub-Contract Dispute over Variations & Payment for Aluminium and Glazing Works | High Court | 14 Apr 2014 | Judgment for Plaintiff |
12 | Longyuan-Arrk v Show and Tell: Breach of Contract, Defamation, and Signage Installation Dispute | High Court | 21 Aug 2013 | Judgment for the Defendant in the amount of $105,566.55 |
13 | Chye Heng Huat Engineering v Concept Builders: Construction Dispute over Defective Steel Fittings | High Court | 26 May 2010 | Appeal allowed in part; judgment granted to the plaintiff for $304,458.06 with leave to defend for the remaining $85,799.87 on condition that the defendant pay the sum into court or provide a bank guarantee. |
14 | Lam Hong Leong Aluminium v Lian Teck Huat: Guarantee, Construction Contract Dispute | High Court | 09 Mar 2003 | Judgment for Plaintiff |