Inadequate Legal Assistance
Inadequate Legal Assistance is a specialized practice area in Singapore's legal system. This area encompasses 3 cases from 2020 to 2022.
Leading Law Firms
Analysis of law firms specializing in Inadequate Legal Assistance, ranked by case volume and success rates.
| Law Firm | Cases |
|---|---|
| Attorney-General’s Chambers100.00% success rate | 3 cases100.0% of area |
| Independent Practitioner0.00% success rate | 1 cases33.3% of area |
| Eugene Thuraisingam LLP0.00% success rate | 1 cases33.3% of area |
| Sureshan LLC0.00% success rate | 1 cases33.3% of area |
| Trident Law Corporation0.00% success rate | 1 cases33.3% of area |
| R. Ramason & Almenoar0.00% success rate | 1 cases33.3% of area |
| BMS Law LLC0.00% success rate | 1 cases33.3% of area |
| Regency Legal LLP0.00% success rate | 1 cases33.3% of area |
| Thangavelu LLC0.00% success rate | 1 cases33.3% of area |
Notable Lawyers
Leading lawyers practicing in Inadequate Legal Assistance, ranked by case volume and success rates.
| Lawyer | Cases |
|---|---|
| Too Xing Ji0.00% success rate | 1 cases33.3% of area |
| Balakrishnan Chitra0.00% success rate | 1 cases33.3% of area |
| Chng Luey Chi100.00% success rate | 1 cases33.3% of area |
| Sunil Sudheesan0.00% success rate | 1 cases33.3% of area |
| Sureshan s/o T Kulasingam0.00% success rate | 1 cases33.3% of area |
| Tan Jun Yin0.00% success rate | 1 cases33.3% of area |
| Kwang Jia Min0.00% success rate | 1 cases33.3% of area |
| Terence Chua100.00% success rate | 1 cases33.3% of area |
| Samuel Ang Rong En0.00% success rate | 1 cases33.3% of area |
| Mohamed Baiross0.00% success rate | 1 cases33.3% of area |
Recent Judgments
Displaying 3 most recent judgments out of 3 total cases
| No. | Title | Court | Decision Date | Outcomes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Public Prosecutor v Haridass: Conspiracy to Traffic Diamorphine & Inadequate Legal Assistance | GENERAL DIVISION OF THE high court of the republic of singapore | 15 Nov 2022 | Accused allowed to recall Prosecution witnesses and give further evidence. |
| 2 | PP v Mohd Noor: Remittal Hearing on Drug Importation & Adequacy of Legal Counsel | General Division of the High Court | 28 Mar 2022 | The matters raised by Mohd Noor did not affect his conviction. |
| 3 | Mohammad Farid v Public Prosecutor: Trafficking Diamorphine & Courier Status under Misuse of Drugs Act | Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore | 25 Mar 2020 | Farid's appeal against conviction is dismissed, but the court finds he was a courier. Ranjit's appeal and motion are dismissed. |