Jurisdiction of Arbitral tribunal
Jurisdiction of Arbitral tribunal is a specialized practice area in Singapore's legal system. This area encompasses 11 cases from 2003 to 2021.
Leading Law Firms
Analysis of law firms specializing in Jurisdiction of Arbitral tribunal, ranked by case volume and success rates.
Law Firm | Cases |
---|---|
Davinder Singh Chambers LLC50.00% success rate | 2 cases18.2% of area |
Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP0.00% success rate | 2 cases18.2% of area |
Allen & Gledhill LLP50.00% success rate | 2 cases18.2% of area |
WongPartnership LLP0.00% success rate | 2 cases18.2% of area |
Legal Clinic LLC100.00% success rate | 1 cases9.1% of area |
CLASIS LLC0.00% success rate | 1 cases9.1% of area |
Bird & Bird ATMD LLP100.00% success rate | 1 cases9.1% of area |
Withers KhattarWong LLP0.00% success rate | 1 cases9.1% of area |
TSMP Law Corporation100.00% success rate | 1 cases9.1% of area |
Drew & Napier LLC0.00% success rate | 1 cases9.1% of area |
Notable Lawyers
Leading lawyers practicing in Jurisdiction of Arbitral tribunal, ranked by case volume and success rates.
Lawyer | Cases |
---|---|
Tan Ruo Yu0.00% success rate | 2 cases18.2% of area |
Boey Swee Siang33.33% success rate | 2 cases18.2% of area |
Alvin Yeo0.00% success rate | 2 cases18.2% of area |
Clarence Lun Yaodong100.00% success rate | 1 cases9.1% of area |
Zhuang Wenxiong0.00% success rate | 1 cases9.1% of area |
Thio Shen Yi SC100.00% success rate | 1 cases9.1% of area |
Kenneth Tan0.00% success rate | 1 cases9.1% of area |
Toh Wei Yi100.00% success rate | 1 cases9.1% of area |
Lem Jit Min Andy100.00% success rate | 1 cases9.1% of area |
Lin Weiqi Wendy0.00% success rate | 1 cases9.1% of area |
Recent Judgments
Displaying 11 most recent judgments out of 11 total cases
No. | Title | Court | Decision Date | Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | CEF & CEG v CEH: Setting Aside Arbitral Award for Breach of Natural Justice and Exceeding Scope of Arbitration | General Division of the High Court of the Republic of Singapore | 18 May 2021 | Plaintiffs' application dismissed with costs. |
2 | CBS v CBP: Setting Aside Arbitral Award for Breach of Natural Justice | Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore | 19 Jan 2021 | Appeal Dismissed |
3 | Tamar Perry v Bonnet Esculier: Interpleader, Striking Out, Pleadings Amendment in Offshore Case | Singapore International Commercial Court | 29 Oct 2020 | Application to strike out the unjust enrichment claim succeeded. Leave to amend the Writ and Statement of Claim was not granted in certain respects. The case was designated as an Offshore case. |
4 | CBX v CBZ: Setting Aside Arbitration Awards for Exceeding Jurisdiction and Public Policy | Singapore International Commercial Court | 15 Jul 2020 | Plaintiffs' setting aside applications are dismissed. |
5 | CES v IATA: Jurisdiction Challenge in International Arbitration | Singapore International Commercial Court | 23 Mar 2020 | Originating Summons dismissed |
6 | Rex International v Gulf Hibiscus: Stay of Proceedings & Arbitration | Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore | 21 Oct 2019 | Appeal dismissed. |
7 | Sinolanka Hotels v Interna Contract: Dispute over Arbitral Tribunal Jurisdiction | High Court | 05 Jul 2018 | Application dismissed. |
8 | BNP v BNR: Dispute over Tribunal Jurisdiction under International Arbitration Act and ICC Rules | High Court of Singapore | 30 Oct 2017 | Plaintiffs' application dismissed with costs. |
9 | William Jacks v Nelson Honey: Long-Arm Jurisdiction & Forum Non Conveniens | High Court | 15 Sep 2015 | Summons dismissed on the condition that William Jacks abandons proceedings in New Zealand if it fails to dismiss or stay proceedings there. |
10 | Doshion Ltd v Sembawang Engineers: Dispute Over Settlement Agreement and Arbitration Termination | High Court | 27 Feb 2011 | Plaintiff's application dismissed. |
11 | PT Tugu Pratama Indonesia v Magma Nusantara Ltd: Arbitration Agreement & Tribunal Jurisdiction Dispute | High Court | 09 Sep 2003 | Application dismissed except for the order on costs, which was set aside. The applicant shall pay the respondent its costs of these proceedings. |