Mental Capacity Act
Mental Capacity Act is a specialized practice area in Singapore's legal system. This area encompasses 6 cases from 2014 to 2023.
Leading Law Firms
Analysis of law firms specializing in Mental Capacity Act, ranked by case volume and success rates.
Law Firm | Cases |
---|---|
Attorney-General’s Chambers0.00% success rate | 2 cases33.3% of area |
Nine Yards Chambers LLC100.00% success rate | 1 cases16.7% of area |
PY Legal LLC0.00% success rate | 1 cases16.7% of area |
Engelin Teh Practice LLC0.00% success rate | 1 cases16.7% of area |
JCP Law LLC0.00% success rate | 1 cases16.7% of area |
Nicholas & Tan Partnership LLP100.00% success rate | 1 cases16.7% of area |
Kalco Law LLC0.00% success rate | 1 cases16.7% of area |
Mirchandani & Partners0.00% success rate | 1 cases16.7% of area |
Leo Fernando100.00% success rate | 1 cases16.7% of area |
Patrick Tan LLC100.00% success rate | 1 cases16.7% of area |
Notable Lawyers
Leading lawyers practicing in Mental Capacity Act, ranked by case volume and success rates.
Lawyer | Cases |
---|---|
Linda Joelle Ong0.00% success rate | 1 cases16.7% of area |
Cheong Yon-Wen Jeremy0.00% success rate | 1 cases16.7% of area |
Yeo Lai Hock Nichol100.00% success rate | 1 cases16.7% of area |
Qua Bi Qi100.00% success rate | 1 cases16.7% of area |
Chia Wei Lin Rebecca0.00% success rate | 1 cases16.7% of area |
Markus Kng Tian Sheng0.00% success rate | 1 cases16.7% of area |
Nicholas Narayanan100.00% success rate | 1 cases16.7% of area |
Peter Keith Fernando100.00% success rate | 1 cases16.7% of area |
Tan Xin Er, Sylvie0.00% success rate | 1 cases16.7% of area |
Tan Wee Hao0.00% success rate | 1 cases16.7% of area |
Recent Judgments
Displaying 6 most recent judgments out of 6 total cases
No. | Title | Court | Decision Date | Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Quek Peng Hock Henry v Chia Swee Hun: Resulting Trusts, Inter Vivos Gifts, Undue Influence | General Division of the High Court | 31 May 2023 | Judgment for Plaintiff |
2 | UBQ v UBR: Child Custody, Care and Control, and Access Dispute after Relocation Attempt | Family Justice Courts of the Republic of Singapore | 30 May 2022 | SUM 326 and SUM 370 were dismissed. |
3 | - | 10 Mar 2019 | Unknown | |
4 | GCX v Public Prosecutor: MTO Suitability Report & Sentencing for Voluntarily Causing Hurt | High Court of Singapore | 23 Jan 2019 | Appeal Allowed |
5 | Public Prosecutor v ASR: Sentencing of Young Offender with Intellectual Disability for Rape & Sexual Assault | High Court | 19 Apr 2018 | Accused sentenced to Reformative Training. Prosecution's appeal against the decision is pending. |
6 | BDU v BDT: Hague Convention, International Child Abduction, Grave Risk of Psychological Harm | Court of Appeal | 16 Feb 2014 | Return order made in respect of the child, subject to specific undertakings by both parties. |