Restraint of foreign proceedings
Restraint of foreign proceedings is a specialized practice area in Singapore's legal system. This area encompasses 22 cases from 2003 to 2024.
Leading Law Firms
Analysis of law firms specializing in Restraint of foreign proceedings, ranked by case volume and success rates.
Law Firm | Cases |
---|---|
Drew & Napier LLC75.00% success rate | 4 cases18.2% of area |
Straits Law Practice LLC0.00% success rate | 3 cases13.6% of area |
Salem Ibrahim LLC0.00% success rate | 2 cases9.1% of area |
Niru & Co LLC50.00% success rate | 2 cases9.1% of area |
Providence Law Asia LLC0.00% success rate | 2 cases9.1% of area |
WongPartnership LLP50.00% success rate | 2 cases9.1% of area |
K&L Gates Straits Law LLC0.00% success rate | 2 cases9.1% of area |
Tan Kok Quan Partnership50.00% success rate | 2 cases9.1% of area |
Davinder Singh Chambers LLC50.00% success rate | 2 cases9.1% of area |
Rajah & Tann LLP100.00% success rate | 2 cases9.1% of area |
Notable Lawyers
Leading lawyers practicing in Restraint of foreign proceedings, ranked by case volume and success rates.
Lawyer | Cases |
---|---|
Cavinder Bull71.43% success rate | 3 cases13.6% of area |
Tay Hong Zhi Gerald60.00% success rate | 3 cases13.6% of area |
Woo Shu Yan60.00% success rate | 3 cases13.6% of area |
N Sreenivasan0.00% success rate | 3 cases13.6% of area |
Jaikanth Shankar33.33% success rate | 2 cases9.1% of area |
Davinder Singh33.33% success rate | 2 cases9.1% of area |
Jaspreet Singh Sachdev33.33% success rate | 2 cases9.1% of area |
Charlene Wee Swee Ting0.00% success rate | 2 cases9.1% of area |
Kanapathi Pillai Nirumalan33.33% success rate | 2 cases9.1% of area |
Foo Yiew Min50.00% success rate | 2 cases9.1% of area |
Recent Judgments
Displaying 22 most recent judgments out of 22 total cases
No. | Title | Court | Decision Date | Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Finaport Pte Ltd v Techteryx Ltd: Anti-Suit Injunction & Conflict of Laws | General Division of the High Court of the Republic of Singapore | 26 Dec 2024 | Application dismissed with costs. |
2 | TrueCoin LLC v Techteryx, Ltd: Anti-Suit Injunction & Arbitration Agreement Dispute | General Division of the High Court of the Republic of Singapore | 28 Nov 2024 | Anti-suit injunction granted restraining Techteryx from continuing to pursue the Hong Kong action against TrueCoin. |
3 | - | 12 Nov 2024 | Unknown | |
4 | - | 03 Nov 2024 | Unknown | |
5 | Public Prosecutor v JCS: Statutory Rape, Sexual Penetration of a Minor, and Rioting | General Division of the High Court of the Republic of Singapore | 03 Jul 2024 | Appeal Allowed |
6 | Darsan Jitendra Jhaveri v Lakshmi Anil Salgaocar: Appeal on Breach of Trust & Extension of Time Application | Appellate Division of the High Court | 24 Jun 2024 | Application to strike out the appeal dismissed; no order made on applications to adduce further evidence. |
7 | - | 21 Mar 2024 | Unknown | |
8 | DAY v DAZ: Stay of Court Proceedings under International Arbitration Act | General Division of the High Court of the Republic of Singapore | 04 Jul 2023 | Appeal Allowed |
9 | BCS Business Consulting Services v Baker: Anti-Suit Injunction & Protection of Singapore Court Judgments | Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore | 20 Sep 2022 | Appeal Dismissed |
10 | VEW v VEV: Anti-Suit Injunction & Restraint of Foreign Proceedings in Divorce | Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore | 13 Apr 2022 | Appeal Allowed |
11 | Pilgrim v Asian Appraisal: Negligence in Asset Valuation and Loan Security | General Division of the High Court | 16 Jan 2022 | Plaintiff's claims dismissed. |
12 | PT Karya Indo Batam v Wang Zhenwen: Anti-Suit Injunction for Batam Project Dispute | General Division of the High Court of the Republic of Singapore | 12 Jul 2021 | Anti-suit injunction granted to restrain PT Karya Indo Batam from pursuing actions in Indonesia relating to the Batam Project. |
13 | Mulacek v Civelli: Appeal on Forum Non Conveniens and Anti-Suit Injunction in Breach of Contract and Fiduciary Duty Claims | Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore | 14 Jun 2020 | Appeals dismissed with costs. |
14 | Civelli v. Mulacek: Forum Non Conveniens & Anti-Suit Injunction in Loan Dispute | High Court of the Republic of Singapore | 13 Aug 2019 | Mr Mulacek’s application for an anti-suit injunction to restrain the Texas proceedings is dismissed. Subject to Mr Civelli fulfilling his undertaking to discontinue both suits, Mr Civelli’s applications for an extension of time to apply for a stay of Mr Mulacek’s counterclaim, and for a stay of the same are granted. |
15 | Lakshmi Anil Salgaocar v Jhaveri Darsan Jitendra: Anti-Suit Injunction & Natural Forum Dispute | Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore | 25 Jul 2019 | Appeal Allowed |
16 | Rotary Engineering v Kioumji & Eslim: Forum Non Conveniens and Stay of Proceedings | Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore | 20 Mar 2017 | Appeal allowed. |
17 | Ramesh v AXA Life: Negligence, Duty of Care, and Employer References | Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore | 26 Jul 2016 | Appeal Allowed in Part |
18 | Bank of East Asia v Quah Su-Ling: Summary Judgment and Stay Application in Share Margin Facility Dispute | High Court | 27 Mar 2014 | Appeals dismissed; summary judgment granted to the plaintiff. |
19 | World Sport Group v Dorsey James Michael: Pre-Action Interrogatories & Defamation | High Court | 09 Apr 2013 | Appeal allowed in part. The defendant had to answer interrogatories nos 1, 2(a), 2(b), 2(c), 6 and 6.1. |
20 | Regalindo Resources v Seatrek Trans: Anti-Suit Injunction & Arbitration Agreement Dispute | High Court | 15 May 2008 | Application dismissed. |
21 | Tan Yeow Hiang Kenneth v Tan Chor Chuan: Review of Costs in Defamation Action | High Court | 09 Nov 2005 | The court decided that it did not have the power to allow a further reduction on account of the failed defenses. The court also decided that, even if it were open to it to grant a reduction, no reduction ought to be allowed. |
22 | Elan Impex v Daewoo: Wrongful Termination, Service Out of Jurisdiction, and Forum Non Conveniens | High Court | 07 Feb 2003 | Action against the first defendant and fourth defendant struck out; orders giving leave to serve outside jurisdiction set aside; interim injunctions discharged; claim against the third defendant and the Mareva injunction against him stayed. |