Sentencing Principles

Sentencing Principles is a specialized practice area in Singapore's legal system. This area encompasses 35 cases from 2001 to 2023.

Leading Law Firms

Analysis of law firms specializing in Sentencing Principles, ranked by case volume and success rates.

Law FirmCases
Attorney-General’s Chambers59.26% success rate27 cases77.1% of area
Eldan Law LLP0.00% success rate2 cases5.7% of area
Dhillon & Panoo LLC0.00% success rate2 cases5.7% of area
Deputy Public Prosecutors100.00% success rate2 cases5.7% of area
Allen & Gledhill LLP50.00% success rate2 cases5.7% of area
Quahe Woo & Palmer LLC50.00% success rate2 cases5.7% of area
Bajwa & Co0.00% success rate1 cases2.9% of area
Rajwin & Yong LLP0.00% success rate1 cases2.9% of area
Bayfront Law LLC100.00% success rate1 cases2.9% of area
JWS Asia Law Corporation0.00% success rate1 cases2.9% of area

Notable Lawyers

Leading lawyers practicing in Sentencing Principles, ranked by case volume and success rates.

LawyerCases
Chong Kee En100.00% success rate3 cases8.6% of area
Kan Shuk Weng100.00% success rate2 cases5.7% of area
Josephus Tan0.00% success rate2 cases5.7% of area
Suppiah Krishnamurthi0.00% success rate2 cases5.7% of area
April Phang Suet Fern50.00% success rate2 cases5.7% of area
Tang Shangjun100.00% success rate2 cases5.7% of area
Susanna Yim100.00% success rate2 cases5.7% of area
Hri Kumar Nair50.00% success rate2 cases5.7% of area
S S Dhillon0.00% success rate2 cases5.7% of area
Benedict Teong100.00% success rate1 cases2.9% of area

Recent Judgments

Displaying 35 most recent judgments out of 35 total cases

No.TitleCourtDecision DateOutcomes
1Ma Zhen Hu Michael v Public Prosecutor: Dangerous Driving and Disqualification OrderGeneral Division of the High Court06 Sep 2023
Appeal Dismissed
2Public Prosecutor v Loh Cheok San: Abetment by Conspiracy and CheatingGeneral Division of the High Court12 Jul 2023
Appeal Allowed in Part
3PP v Low Sze Song: Trafficking of Diamorphine under Misuse of Drugs ActGeneral Division of the High Court13 Apr 2023
Guilty
4Public Prosecutor v Yap Pow Foo: Rape and House-breaking SentencingGeneral Division of the High Court30 Mar 2023
Accused sentenced to 17 years’ imprisonment and 16 strokes of the cane.
5Public Prosecutor v Yap Pow Foo: Rape and Housebreaking by NightGeneral Division of the High Court15 Jan 2023
Accused guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, and convicted on both the Rape Charge and the House-breaking Charge accordingly.
6Lim Hong Boon v Public Prosecutor: Appeal Against Sentence for Fraud under Companies ActGeneral Division of the High Court of the Republic of Singapore22 Aug 2022
Appeal Allowed
7Sue Chang v Public Prosecutor: Sentencing Framework for Road Traffic Act s 65(3)(a) OffencesGeneral Division of the High Court24 Jul 2022
Appeal dismissed.
8PP v BZT: Sentencing for Sexual Assaults Against MinorsGeneral Division of the High Court of the Republic of Singapore26 Jun 2022
Accused sentenced to 18 years’ imprisonment and 24 strokes of the cane.
9Jennifer Toh Suat Leng v Public Prosecutor: Forgery and Cheating Offences SentencingGeneral Division of the High Court22 Jun 2022
Appeal dismissed.
10Sheik Parvez v Public Prosecutor: Driving Under Disqualification & Without InsuranceGeneral Division of the High Court14 Jun 2022
Appeal dismissed.
11Rohrlach v Qantas: Contempt of Court for Breach of Restraint of Trade InjunctionGeneral Division of the High Court of the Republic of Singapore02 Dec 2021
Order of committal granted; Plaintiff to pay a fine of S$25,000 within two weeks, with a term of one week’s imprisonment in default of payment.
12-21 Nov 2021
Unknown
13Public Prosecutor v BMU: Sexual Assault by Penetration SentencingHigh Court of the Republic of Singapore27 Oct 2020
Accused sentenced to 22 years’ imprisonment and 24 strokes of the cane.
14PP v Lim Chai Heng: Sentencing of Mentally Disordered Offender in Fatal Traffic AccidentHigh Court of the Republic of Singapore24 Nov 2019
Accused sentenced to one year imprisonment and disqualified from driving for 12 years.
15Anita Damu v Public Prosecutor: Mental Illness, Expert Evidence, and AdmissibilityHigh Court of the Republic of Singapore29 Sep 2019
Finding of the District Judge that the appellant did experience auditory hallucinations set aside. Further directions to be given after hearing from the parties.
16Ho Mei Xia Hannah v Public Prosecutor: Appeal Against Sentence for Offences Against Public ServantsHigh Court of the Republic of Singapore09 Sep 2019
Appeal Dismissed
17Chong Sher Shen v Public Prosecutor: Appeal Against Dismissal of Criminal Revision Regarding Erroneous Criminal RecordsCourt of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore16 May 2019
Criminal Motion dismissed.
18-17 Apr 2019
Unknown
19PP v Mohd Ariffan: Adducing Fresh Evidence on Appeal in Sexual Offence CaseCourt of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore13 Feb 2018
The Prosecution's application to admit the affidavits of Matin, Superintendent Chua, and Assistant Superintendent Jaga was dismissed. The application to admit the evidence of Ms. Ng was allowed in part. Ms. Ng's affidavit, section 7, and paragraphs 5.3.4 and 5.5 of the expert report are admitted as further evidence in this appeal.
20Public Prosecutor v BPK: Attempted Murder & ProvocationHigh Court of the Republic of Singapore13 Feb 2018
Accused convicted on the charge of attempted murder.
21-13 Sep 2017
Unknown
22Chang Kar Meng v Public Prosecutor: Rape and Robbery Sentencing ReviewCourt of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore29 Mar 2017
Appeal Allowed
23Koh Chee Tong v Public Prosecutor: Appeal Against 12-Week Imprisonment for Computer Misuse and Cybersecurity Act OffencesHigh Court of the Republic of Singapore08 Sep 2016
Appeal dismissed.
24PP v Koh Wen Jie Boaz: Second Probation & Sentencing of Youthful OffendersHigh Court25 Oct 2015
Appeal Allowed
25Lim Bee Ngan Karen v PP: Parity Principle & Sentencing for Betting Act OffencesHigh Court15 Jul 2015
Appeal allowed in part. The imprisonment terms for the Third to the Fifth Proceeded Charges were replaced with an imprisonment term of four months for each of these three Proceeded Charges. The imprisonment terms for the Third Proceeded Charge and the Fifth Proceeded Charge are to run consecutively, making a total imprisonment term of eight months for the Third to the Fifth Proceeded Charges. The fines imposed by the Sentencing Judge for all five Proceeded Charges as well as the default imprisonment terms in respect of those fines were upheld.
26Public Prosecutor v Micheal Anak Garing: Sentencing for Murder with Common IntentionHigh Court19 Apr 2015
Micheal Anak Garing sentenced to death; Tony Anak Imba sentenced to life imprisonment and 24 strokes of the cane.
27PP v Chong Hou En: Voyeurism, Mental Disorder & Penal Code s 509 SentencingHigh Court15 Mar 2015
Appeal Allowed
28PP v Sivakumar: Impersonating a Public Servant, Outraging Modesty, Sexual Assault, and RapeHigh Court12 Sep 2013
Accused acquitted on first charge; convicted on second, third, and fourth charges.
29Public Prosecutor v Mohammad Johan bin Rashid: Culpable Homicide Arising from Uncontrolled AngerHigh Court27 Mar 2011
Accused sentenced to 16 years' imprisonment and eight strokes of the cane.
30PP v Chow Yee Sze: Sentencing Appeal for Outrage of Modesty under Penal Code s 354High Court29 Aug 2010
Appeal Allowed
31Nur Azilah v PP: Youth Offender Sentencing, Moneylender Harassment & RehabilitationHigh Court28 Jul 2010
Appeal Allowed
32-30 Oct 2007
Unknown
33Public Prosecutor v Lee Meng Soon: Drink Driving & Failure to Render Assistance SentencingHigh Court13 Aug 2007
Appeal allowed in part. The High Court increased the sentence for drink driving to two weeks' imprisonment and a three-year disqualification, to run consecutively with the four-week sentence for failing to render assistance.
34-06 Sep 2006
Unknown
35Public Prosecutor v Khwan-On Nathaphon: Murder, Diminished ResponsibilityHigh Court14 Oct 2001
Guilty of the charge; convicted and sentenced to death.