Statutory derivative action
Statutory derivative action is a specialized practice area in Singapore's legal system. This area encompasses 13 cases from 2014 to 2023.
Leading Law Firms
Analysis of law firms specializing in Statutory derivative action, ranked by case volume and success rates.
Law Firm | Cases |
---|---|
Joseph Lopez LLP50.00% success rate | 2 cases15.4% of area |
Withers KhattarWong LLP0.00% success rate | 2 cases15.4% of area |
Sterling Law Corporation50.00% success rate | 2 cases15.4% of area |
Ong Ying Ping Esq0.00% success rate | 2 cases15.4% of area |
Allen & Gledhill LLP0.00% success rate | 2 cases15.4% of area |
Aequitas Law LLP50.00% success rate | 2 cases15.4% of area |
WongPartnership LLP100.00% success rate | 2 cases15.4% of area |
Cavenagh Law LLP0.00% success rate | 1 cases7.7% of area |
Advocatus Law LLP100.00% success rate | 1 cases7.7% of area |
TSMP Law Corporation100.00% success rate | 1 cases7.7% of area |
Notable Lawyers
Leading lawyers practicing in Statutory derivative action, ranked by case volume and success rates.
Lawyer | Cases |
---|---|
Tan Zhi Min Ashton25.00% success rate | 2 cases15.4% of area |
Chia Wei Chen Pearline25.00% success rate | 2 cases15.4% of area |
Lim Tat66.67% success rate | 2 cases15.4% of area |
Yeo Choon Hsien Leslie50.00% success rate | 2 cases15.4% of area |
Subir Singh Grewal66.67% success rate | 2 cases15.4% of area |
Kyle Yew Chang Mao25.00% success rate | 2 cases15.4% of area |
Ong Ying Ping0.00% success rate | 2 cases15.4% of area |
Lim Jun Hao Alvin0.00% success rate | 2 cases15.4% of area |
Joseph Lopez25.00% success rate | 2 cases15.4% of area |
Harjean Kaur100.00% success rate | 1 cases7.7% of area |
Recent Judgments
Displaying 13 most recent judgments out of 13 total cases
No. | Title | Court | Decision Date | Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Chng Kheng Chye v Kaefer Integrated Services: Statutory Derivative Action & Oral Loan Arrangement Dispute | General Division of the High Court of the Republic of Singapore | 08 Feb 2023 | Judgment for Plaintiff |
2 | Syed Ibrahim v Wavoo Abdusalam: Statutory Derivative Action for Breach of Directors' Duties | General Division of the High Court of the Republic of Singapore | 06 Dec 2022 | Application allowed in part. |
3 | Syed Ibrahim v Wavoo Abdusalam: Statutory Derivative Action & Cross-Examination | General Division of the High Court of the Republic of Singapore | 19 Sep 2022 | Application dismissed with costs. |
4 | Tan Chun Chuen v Beach Hotel Pte Ltd: Application for Derivative Action under Companies Act | General Division of the High Court of the Republic of Singapore | 09 Aug 2022 | Application dismissed |
5 | Mytsyk v Med Travel: Statutory Derivative Action & Director's Duties | General Division of the High Court of the Republic of Singapore | 30 Mar 2022 | Application dismissed. |
6 | Goh Heng Tee v Tiong Hin Engineering: Statutory Derivative Action & Company's Best Interests | General Division of the High Court | 16 Feb 2022 | Originating summons dismissed. |
7 | Ng Tang Hock v Teelek Realty: Oppression, Director Duties & Loan Repayment | High Court of the Republic of Singapore | 07 Oct 2020 | Order for Teelek Realty to be wound up. |
8 | Tiong Sze Yin v HC Surgical Specialists: Statutory Derivative Action & Director's Duties | High Court of the Republic of Singapore | 27 Sep 2020 | Application dismissed with costs. |
9 | Chng Kheng Chye v Kaefer Prostar: Statutory Derivative Action & Leave to Commence Suit | High Court of the Republic of Singapore | 02 Sep 2020 | Application dismissed. |
10 | Poh Fu Tek v Vermont UM Bunkering: Statutory Derivative Action, Minority Shareholders & Good Faith | High Court of the Republic of Singapore | 05 Jul 2020 | Applicants’ proposed derivative actions allowed, subject to certain conditions. |
11 | - | 26 Nov 2019 | Unknown | |
12 | Goh Seng Heng v Liberty Sky Investments: Fraudulent Misrepresentation & Disclosure of Documents | Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore | 04 Oct 2017 | Appeal Allowed |
13 | Re Beloff Michael Jacob QC: Ad Hoc Admission, Legal Profession Act, Schemes of Arrangement | Court of Appeal | 15 May 2014 | Appeals allowed and the Judge’s decision to admit Mr Beloff on an ad hoc basis to represent nTan in the Setting-Aside Summonses was set aside. |