Statutory obligations

Statutory obligations is a specialized practice area in Singapore's legal system. This area encompasses 3 cases from 2016 to 2024.

Leading Law Firms

Analysis of law firms specializing in Statutory obligations, ranked by case volume and success rates.

Law FirmCases
TSMP Law Corporation50.00% success rate2 cases66.7% of area
Prolegis LLC0.00% success rate1 cases33.3% of area
Breakpoint LLC100.00% success rate1 cases33.3% of area
Timothy Ng LLC0.00% success rate1 cases33.3% of area
Chelliah & Kiang LLC100.00% success rate1 cases33.3% of area
Michael Por Law Corporation0.00% success rate1 cases33.3% of area
Bogaars & Din0.00% success rate1 cases33.3% of area
Allen & Gledhill LLP0.00% success rate1 cases33.3% of area
Samuel Seow Law Corporation0.00% success rate1 cases33.3% of area

Notable Lawyers

Leading lawyers practicing in Statutory obligations, ranked by case volume and success rates.

LawyerCases
Koong Len Sheng100.00% success rate1 cases33.3% of area
Charlene Wee Swee Ting0.00% success rate1 cases33.3% of area
Ang Cheng Hock0.00% success rate1 cases33.3% of area
Tan Yi Liang0.00% success rate1 cases33.3% of area
Kishan Pillay s/o Rajagopal Pillay100.00% success rate1 cases33.3% of area
Chan Michael Karfai100.00% success rate1 cases33.3% of area
Poon Guokun Nicholas100.00% success rate1 cases33.3% of area
Chia Hsiung Wen Daniel0.00% success rate1 cases33.3% of area
Low Hui Xuan Carissa0.00% success rate1 cases33.3% of area
Ker Yanguang0.00% success rate1 cases33.3% of area

Recent Judgments

Displaying 3 most recent judgments out of 3 total cases

No.TitleCourtDecision DateOutcomes
1MCST No 4099 v KTP Consultants: Limitation Act & Negligence in Cladding InstallationAppellate Division of the High Court08 Oct 2024
Appeal Allowed
2Wei Siang v Euro Assets: Building Renovation, Conservation Guidelines & NegligenceHigh Court of Singapore22 Aug 2018
Judgment for Plaintiff on claim in respect of variation works done to install an additional rainwater drop pipe. All of the contractor’s remaining claims against the owner are dismissed. The contractor, the architect, and the engineer are all liable to the owner in respect of the deviations to: (i) the second and third storey rear slabs; (ii) the rear roof slab; and (iii) the rear external staircase; (b) The contractor and the architect, but not the engineer, are liable to the owner for the deviation at the rear boundary wall. The quantum of damages payable to the owner by these three parties will be assessed separately. As against the owner, however, the three parties are jointly and severally liable for the whole of the owner’s loss.
3MCST Plan No 3322 v Tiong Aik: Non-Delegable Duty in Construction DefectsCourt of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore03 Jul 2016
Appeal Dismissed