Trademark Infringement

Trademark Infringement is a specialized practice area in Singapore's legal system. This area encompasses 47 cases from 2000 to 2023.

Leading Law Firms

Analysis of law firms specializing in Trademark Infringement, ranked by case volume and success rates.

Law FirmCases
Drew & Napier LLC60.00% success rate10 cases21.3% of area
Gateway Law Corporation40.00% success rate5 cases10.6% of area
Amica Law LLC25.00% success rate4 cases8.5% of area
Allen & Gledhill LLP25.00% success rate4 cases8.5% of area
Lee & Lee33.33% success rate3 cases6.4% of area
Bird & Bird ATMD LLP33.33% success rate3 cases6.4% of area
Mirandah Law LLP66.67% success rate3 cases6.4% of area
Infinitus Law Corporation66.67% success rate3 cases6.4% of area
Drew and Napier LLC0.00% success rate3 cases6.4% of area
ATMD Bird & Bird LLP66.67% success rate3 cases6.4% of area

Notable Lawyers

Leading lawyers practicing in Trademark Infringement, ranked by case volume and success rates.

LawyerCases
Dedar Singh Gill50.00% success rate6 cases12.8% of area
Tan Tee Jim60.00% success rate5 cases10.6% of area
Gill Dedar Singh100.00% success rate4 cases8.5% of area
Paul Teo75.00% success rate4 cases8.5% of area
Alban Kang25.00% success rate3 cases6.4% of area
Wong Siew Hong0.00% success rate3 cases6.4% of area
Tony Yeo0.00% success rate3 cases6.4% of area
G Radakrishnan100.00% success rate3 cases6.4% of area
Vignesh Vaerhn0.00% success rate3 cases6.4% of area
Prithipal Singh100.00% success rate3 cases6.4% of area

Recent Judgments

Displaying 47 most recent judgments out of 47 total cases

No.TitleCourtDecision DateOutcomes
1Eng's Wantan Noodle v Eng's Char Siew Wantan Mee: Production of Documents, Security for Costs, Trademark, Passing OffGeneral Division of the High Court25 Oct 2023
Both the claimants’ and the defendant’s Single Application Pending Trials are dismissed.
2-23 Oct 2023
Unknown
3Dr. August Wolff v. Combe: Trade Mark Invalidity & Likelihood of ConfusionGeneral Division of the High Court24 Feb 2021
Appeal Dismissed
4Monster Energy Company v Glamco Co, Ltd: Trade Mark Dispute over SWEET MONSTERHigh Court of the Republic of Singapore04 Nov 2018
Appeal dismissed
5Courts (Singapore) Pte Ltd v Big Box Corporation Pte Ltd: Trade Mark Invalidity & DistinctivenessHigh Court of the Republic of Singapore04 Apr 2018
Appeal dismissed.
6Ceramiche Caesar SpA v Caesarstone Sdot-Yam Ltd: Trade Mark Dispute over CAESARSTONE MarkCourt of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore25 Apr 2017
Appeal Allowed
7Samsonite IP Holdings Sarl v An Sheng Trading Pte Ltd: Trade Mark Infringement & Exhaustion of RightsHigh Court of Singapore05 Feb 2017
Summary judgment granted to the Plaintiff.
8Nestlé v Petra Foods: Shape Mark Distinctiveness & Technical Functionality in Trade Mark LawCourt of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore23 Nov 2016
Appeal Dismissed
9Singsung Pte Ltd v LG 26 Electronics: Passing Off, Copyright Infringement, Groundless ThreatsCourt of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore22 May 2016
Appeal allowed in part.
10Tan Wei v Public Prosecutor: Appeal Against Excessive Sentence for Trade Marks Act OffenceHigh Court of the Republic of Singapore19 Apr 2016
Appeal Allowed
11Caesarstone Sdot-Yam Ltd v Ceramiche Caesar SpA: Trade Mark Dispute over CAESARSTONE MarkHigh Court of the Republic of Singapore28 Mar 2016
Appeal Allowed
12Formula One Licensing BV v Idea Marketing SA: Trade Mark Opposition for F1H20High Court12 Oct 2015
Appellant's case dismissed on all grounds; respondent's application mark can proceed to registration.
13Global Tobacco v Jamal: Trade Mark Invalidity for Cigarette ProductsCourt of Appeal28 Sep 2015
Appeal Dismissed
14Louis Vuitton v Cuffz: Trademark Infringement and Statutory DamagesHigh Court19 Jul 2015
Judgment for Plaintiff
15Allergan, Inc v Ferlandz Nutra: Trademark Infringement, Passing Off, Injurious FalsehoodHigh Court12 Jan 2015
Defendant's application for leave for its officer to act on its behalf dismissed.
16Converse Inc v Ramesh Ramchandani: Trade Mark Infringement & Statutory Damages for Counterfeit GoodsHigh Court22 May 2014
Judgment for Plaintiff
17Bosch Corp v Wiedson International: Trademark Infringement, Striking Out DefenceHigh Court24 Feb 2013
Appeal by the defendants is dismissed in part and allowed in part.
18Staywell v Starwood: Trademark Dispute over 'Park Regis' and 'St. Regis' BrandsHigh Court08 Oct 2012
Staywell's appeal allowed and the Opponents’ cross-appeal dismissed.
19P. T. Swakarya Indah Busana v Haniffa: Trade Mark Invalidation for Bad Faith RegistrationHigh Court29 Mar 2012
Declaration granted that the registrations of the Challenged Marks are invalid.
20Campomar SL v Nike International Ltd: Trade Mark Registration DisputeCourt of Appeal27 Feb 2011
Campomar's appeal is allowed.
21Festina Lotus v Romanson: Trade Mark Opposition for J.ESTINA & DeviceHigh Court15 Jul 2010
Appeal Allowed
22Clinique Laboratories v Clinique Suisse: Trademark Infringement & Passing OffHigh Court01 Jul 2010
Judgment for Plaintiff
23Valentino Globe BV v Pacific Rim Industries Inc: Trade Mark Registration OppositionCourt of Appeal25 Mar 2010
Appeal Dismissed
24Ozone Community Corp v Advance Magazine Publishers: Trade Mark Dispute over 'HYSTERIC GLAMOUR' and 'GLAMOUR'High Court14 Jan 2010
Appeal Allowed
25Mobil Petroleum v Hyundai Mobis: Trademark Registration Refusal AppealCourt of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore04 Aug 2009
Appeal dismissed
26MediaCorp News v Astro: Trade Mark Registration Refusal & Likelihood of ConfusionHigh Court02 Aug 2009
Appeal dismissed.
27Mitac v SingTel: Trade Mark Infringement Dispute over 'Mio' MarksHigh Court04 Jun 2009
Plaintiff's claims dismissed
28Love & Co v The Carat Club: Trade Mark Invalidity & Revocation for 'LOVE'High Court21 Sep 2008
Application granted; registration of the defendant's simple “LOVE” mark declared invalid and revoked.
29Future Enterprises v McDonald's: Trade Mark Dispute over 'MacCoffee' and 'McCAFÉ'Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore27 Mar 2007
Appeal dismissed with costs.
30Nautical Concept v Jeffery Mark Richard: Trade Mark Registration Dispute over JWEST MarkHigh Court26 Dec 2006
Appeal Dismissed in Part
31Richemont International SA v Da Vinci Collections: Trade Mark Infringement & ValidityHigh Court21 Aug 2006
Judgment for Plaintiff
32Da Vinci Collection v Richemont: Trade Mark Infringement & Interim InjunctionCourt of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore21 Jun 2006
Appeal allowed
33The Polo/Lauren Co, LP v Shop-In Department Store: Trade Mark Infringement AnalysisCourt of Appeal05 Apr 2006
Appeal Dismissed
34Richemont International SA v Goldlion: Trade Mark Opposition - Likelihood of ConfusionHigh Court30 Oct 2005
Appeal dismissed with costs.
35Platts-Mills v Trek Technology: Ad Hoc Admission of Queen's Counsel for Patent Infringement AppealHigh Court06 Oct 2005
Application Granted
36Mopi Pte Ltd v Central Mercantile Corp (S) Ltd: Trademark Infringement & Passing Off DisputeHigh Court29 Sep 2005
Both appeals dismissed.
37McDonald's Corp v Future Enterprises: Trade Mark Registration DisputeCourt of Appeal02 Nov 2004
Appeal Dismissed
38Creative Technology v Cosmos Trade-Nology: Trade Mark Infringement & DamagesHigh Court07 Jan 2004
Judgment for Plaintiff; damages awarded for trade mark infringement.
39Reemtsma v Hugo Boss: Revocation of Trade Mark for Non-Use under Trade Marks ActHigh Court09 Sep 2003
Applicant's applications allowed with costs.
40Creative Technology Ltd v Cosmos Trade-Nology Pte Ltd: Trademark Infringement & Director's LiabilityHigh Court25 Aug 2003
Summary judgment granted to the Plaintiff.
41Fragrance Foodstuff v Bee Cheng Hiang: Copyright & Trademark Infringement DisputeHigh Court08 Jul 2002
Judgment for Plaintiff
42The Polo/Lauren Company L.P. v United States Polo Association: Trademark Dispute over Polo Player LogoHigh Court17 Jan 2002
Motions dismissed
43Highway Video v Public Prosecutor: Copyright Infringement, Foreign Films & Parallel ImportsHigh Court10 Dec 2001
Appeals allowed.
44PT Permona v Shanghai Tobacco: Trade Mark Dispute over CHUNG HWA BrandHigh Court29 Nov 2001
Appeal Dismissed
45Mopi Pte Ltd v Central Mercantile Corporation: Trademark Dispute over Hi-Bond MarkHigh Court30 Oct 2001
Plaintiffs' claim dismissed with costs; interlocutory judgment for Defendants on counterclaim.
46-13 Apr 2000
Unknown
47National Aerated Water v Monarch: Trademark License, Restraint of Trade & Beverage DistributionCourt of Appeal11 Jan 2000
Appeal dismissed with costs, but the injunction was amended to be less broad.