Vexatious and oppressive conduct

Vexatious and oppressive conduct is a specialized practice area in Singapore's legal system. This area encompasses 14 cases from 2003 to 2024.

Leading Law Firms

Analysis of law firms specializing in Vexatious and oppressive conduct, ranked by case volume and success rates.

Law FirmCases
Allen & Gledhill LLP50.00% success rate2 cases14.3% of area
Straits Law Practice LLC0.00% success rate2 cases14.3% of area
Attorney-General’s Chambers100.00% success rate1 cases7.1% of area
Prolegis LLC0.00% success rate1 cases7.1% of area
Eugene Thuraisingam LLP0.00% success rate1 cases7.1% of area
Tan Kok Quan Partnership100.00% success rate1 cases7.1% of area
K&L Gates Straits Law LLC0.00% success rate1 cases7.1% of area
Bayfront Law LLC0.00% success rate1 cases7.1% of area
Davinder Singh Chambers LLC100.00% success rate1 cases7.1% of area
Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP0.00% success rate1 cases7.1% of area

Notable Lawyers

Leading lawyers practicing in Vexatious and oppressive conduct, ranked by case volume and success rates.

LawyerCases
Kanapathi Pillai Nirumalan25.00% success rate2 cases14.3% of area
N Sreenivasan0.00% success rate2 cases14.3% of area
Yeo Lai Hock100.00% success rate1 cases7.1% of area
Jaikanth Shankar100.00% success rate1 cases7.1% of area
Tham Lijing0.00% success rate1 cases7.1% of area
Eugene Singarajah Thuraisingam0.00% success rate1 cases7.1% of area
Abdul Mateen Bajerai0.00% success rate1 cases7.1% of area
Paras Manohar Lalwani0.00% success rate1 cases7.1% of area
Keith Tnee100.00% success rate1 cases7.1% of area
Zhang Jun100.00% success rate1 cases7.1% of area

Recent Judgments

Displaying 14 most recent judgments out of 14 total cases

No.TitleCourtDecision DateOutcomes
1Finaport Pte Ltd v Techteryx Ltd: Anti-Suit Injunction & Conflict of LawsGeneral Division of the High Court of the Republic of Singapore26 Dec 2024
Application dismissed with costs.
2-03 Nov 2024
Unknown
3STS Seatoshore Group v Wansa Commodities: Anti-Suit Injunction & Arbitration Agreement DisputeGeneral Division of the High Court of the Republic of Singapore21 Oct 2024
Originating Application dismissed; Interim Order discharged; Inquiry as to damages declined.
4Public Prosecutor v JCS: Statutory Rape, Sexual Penetration of a Minor, and RiotingGeneral Division of the High Court of the Republic of Singapore03 Jul 2024
Appeal Allowed
5Pilgrim v Asian Appraisal: Negligence in Asset Valuation and Loan SecurityGeneral Division of the High Court16 Jan 2022
Plaintiff's claims dismissed.
6VKC v VJZ: Anti-Suit Injunction & Exclusive Jurisdiction in Estate DisputeCourt of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore28 Jul 2021
Appeal Dismissed
7PT Karya Indo Batam v Wang Zhenwen: Anti-Suit Injunction for Batam Project DisputeGeneral Division of the High Court of the Republic of Singapore12 Jul 2021
Anti-suit injunction granted to restrain PT Karya Indo Batam from pursuing actions in Indonesia relating to the Batam Project.
8Lakshmi Anil Salgaocar v Jhaveri Darsan Jitendra: Anti-Suit Injunction & Natural Forum DisputeCourt of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore25 Jul 2019
Appeal Allowed
9Ramesh v AXA Life: Negligence, Duty of Care, and Employer ReferencesCourt of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore26 Jul 2016
Appeal Allowed in Part
10Bank of East Asia v Quah Su-Ling: Summary Judgment and Stay Application in Share Margin Facility DisputeHigh Court27 Mar 2014
Appeals dismissed; summary judgment granted to the plaintiff.
11World Sport Group v Dorsey James Michael: Pre-Action Interrogatories & DefamationHigh Court09 Apr 2013
Appeal allowed in part. The defendant had to answer interrogatories nos 1, 2(a), 2(b), 2(c), 6 and 6.1.
12Kirkham v Trane: Anti-Suit Injunction & Natural Forum in Distributorship DisputeCourt of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore14 Jul 2009
Appeal Allowed
13Tan Yeow Hiang Kenneth v Tan Chor Chuan: Review of Costs in Defamation ActionHigh Court09 Nov 2005
The court decided that it did not have the power to allow a further reduction on account of the failed defenses. The court also decided that, even if it were open to it to grant a reduction, no reduction ought to be allowed.
14Elan Impex v Daewoo: Wrongful Termination, Service Out of Jurisdiction, and Forum Non ConveniensHigh Court07 Feb 2003
Action against the first defendant and fourth defendant struck out; orders giving leave to serve outside jurisdiction set aside; interim injunctions discharged; claim against the third defendant and the Mareva injunction against him stayed.