Letters of Indemnity

Letters of Indemnity is a specialized practice area in Singapore's legal system. This area encompasses 6 cases from 2003 to 2023.

Leading Law Firms

Analysis of law firms specializing in Letters of Indemnity, ranked by case volume and success rates.

Law Firm	Cases	Success Rate	Key Lawyers	Recent Cases
Rodyk and Davidson50.00% success rate	2 cases33.3% of area	50.00% success rate	Kelvin Poon (1 cases) Sean La’Brooy (1 cases) Lok Vi Ming (1 cases)	Projector SA v Marubeni: Amendment of Notice of Appeal and Prejudice to Respondent(Dec 2004) Marubeni v Projector SA: Interim Mandatory Injunction & Letters of Indemnity Dispute(Aug 2004)
Drew and Napier LLC0.00% success rate	2 cases33.3% of area	0.00% success rate	Werner Tsu (2 cases) Ian Koh (1 cases)	Projector SA v Marubeni: Amendment of Notice of Appeal and Prejudice to Respondent(Dec 2004) Marubeni v Projector SA: Interim Mandatory Injunction & Letters of Indemnity Dispute(Aug 2004)
Kenneth Tan Partnership0.00% success rate	1 cases16.7% of area	0.00% success rate	Kenneth Tan SC (1 cases) Wang Wei Chi (1 cases)	BNP Paribas v Bandung Shipping: Wrongful Cargo Discharge & Letters of Indemnity(May 2003)
Wee Swee Teow LLP0.00% success rate	1 cases16.7% of area	0.00% success rate	Giam Chin Toon (1 cases) Lee Wei Yuen Arvin (1 cases) Wan Hui Ting (1 cases)	Crédit Agricole v PPT Energy: Letter of Credit, Fraud, & Indemnity Dispute(Oct 2023)
Essex Court Chambers0.00% success rate	1 cases16.7% of area	0.00% success rate	David Joseph (1 cases) Bibek Mukherjee (1 cases)	Crédit Agricole v PPT Energy: Letter of Credit, Fraud, & Indemnity Dispute(Oct 2023)
Mayer Brown (Singapore) Pte Ltd0.00% success rate	1 cases16.7% of area	0.00% success rate	Tay Yu-Jin (1 cases)	Crédit Agricole v PPT Energy: Letter of Credit, Fraud, & Indemnity Dispute(Oct 2023)
Twenty Essex Chambers0.00% success rate	1 cases16.7% of area	0.00% success rate	Michael Collett (1 cases)	Crédit Agricole v PPT Energy: Letter of Credit, Fraud, & Indemnity Dispute(Oct 2023)
Rajah and Tann100.00% success rate	1 cases16.7% of area	100.00% success rate	Toh Kian Sing (1 cases) David Tan Yew Beng (1 cases)	Sinogreat v Hin Leong: Breach of Contract & Cargo Confiscation Dispute(Apr 2003)
S Gunaseelan and Partners0.00% success rate	1 cases16.7% of area	0.00% success rate	S Gunaseelan (1 cases)	Sinogreat v Hin Leong: Breach of Contract & Cargo Confiscation Dispute(Apr 2003)
BT Tan and Co0.00% success rate	1 cases16.7% of area	0.00% success rate	Tan Bar Tien (1 cases) Winston Quek (1 cases)	Scotts Investments v Jumabhoy: Director's Remuneration & Interpretation of 'Costs and Expenses'(Feb 2004)

Notable Lawyers

Leading lawyers practicing in Letters of Indemnity, ranked by case volume and success rates.

Lawyer	Cases	Success Rate	Expertise Level	Recent Cases
Werner Tsu0.00% success rate	2 cases33.3% of area	0.00% success rate	Experienced57.5% relevance score	Projector SA v Marubeni: Amendment of Notice of Appeal and Prejudice to Respondent(Dec 2004) Marubeni v Projector SA: Interim Mandatory Injunction & Letters of Indemnity Dispute(Aug 2004)
Nair Suresh Sukumaran0.00% success rate	1 cases16.7% of area	0.00% success rate	Experienced70% relevance score	Crédit Agricole v PPT Energy: Letter of Credit, Fraud, & Indemnity Dispute(Oct 2023)
Bryan Tan0.00% success rate	1 cases16.7% of area	0.00% success rate	Experienced70% relevance score	Crédit Agricole v PPT Energy: Letter of Credit, Fraud, & Indemnity Dispute(Oct 2023)
Toh Kian Sing100.00% success rate	1 cases16.7% of area	100.00% success rate	General Practice40% relevance score	Sinogreat v Hin Leong: Breach of Contract & Cargo Confiscation Dispute(Apr 2003)
Lok Vi Ming100.00% success rate	1 cases16.7% of area	100.00% success rate	Experienced50% relevance score	Projector SA v Marubeni: Amendment of Notice of Appeal and Prejudice to Respondent(Dec 2004)
Tan Bar Tien0.00% success rate	1 cases16.7% of area	0.00% success rate	General Practice40% relevance score	Scotts Investments v Jumabhoy: Director's Remuneration & Interpretation of 'Costs and Expenses'(Feb 2004)
Sean La’Brooy100.00% success rate	1 cases16.7% of area	100.00% success rate	Experienced50% relevance score	Projector SA v Marubeni: Amendment of Notice of Appeal and Prejudice to Respondent(Dec 2004)
Kenneth Tan SC0.00% success rate	1 cases16.7% of area	0.00% success rate	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	BNP Paribas v Bandung Shipping: Wrongful Cargo Discharge & Letters of Indemnity(May 2003)
Peter Gabriel100.00% success rate	1 cases16.7% of area	100.00% success rate	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	BNP Paribas v Bandung Shipping: Wrongful Cargo Discharge & Letters of Indemnity(May 2003)
Harish Kumar0.00% success rate	1 cases16.7% of area	0.00% success rate	General Practice40% relevance score	Scotts Investments v Jumabhoy: Director's Remuneration & Interpretation of 'Costs and Expenses'(Feb 2004)

Recent Judgments

Displaying 6 most recent judgments out of 6 total cases

No.	Title	Court	Decision Date	Outcomes
1	Crédit Agricole v PPT Energy: Letter of Credit, Fraud, & Indemnity Dispute	Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore	23 Oct 2023	Appeal allowed in part.
2	Projector SA v Marubeni: Amendment of Notice of Appeal and Prejudice to Respondent	Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore	02 Dec 2004	Appeal Allowed
3	Marubeni v Projector SA: Interim Mandatory Injunction & Letters of Indemnity Dispute	High Court	15 Aug 2004	Interim mandatory injunction discharged; decision on costs and inquiry as to damages reserved to the trial judge.
4	Scotts Investments v Jumabhoy: Director's Remuneration & Interpretation of 'Costs and Expenses'	High Court	04 Feb 2004	Third defendant's counterclaim dismissed save for inquiry as to out-of-pocket expenses paid on behalf of Scotts Investments (Singapore) Pte Ltd.
5	BNP Paribas v Bandung Shipping: Wrongful Cargo Discharge & Letters of Indemnity	High Court	11 May 2003	Judgment for BNP Paribas with costs and damages to be assessed by the Registrar.
6	Sinogreat v Hin Leong: Breach of Contract & Cargo Confiscation Dispute	High Court	13 Apr 2003	Plaintiffs' claims are dismissed with costs. Defendants' counterclaims are allowed with costs.