Mitigation

Mitigation is a specialized practice area in Singapore's legal system. This area encompasses 7 cases from 2006 to 2023.

Leading Law Firms

Analysis of law firms specializing in Mitigation, ranked by case volume and success rates.

Law FirmCases
Deputy Public Prosecutors33.33% success rate3 cases42.9% of area
Attorney-General’s Chambers100.00% success rate2 cases28.6% of area
Drew & Napier LLC100.00% success rate1 cases14.3% of area
Tan Kok Quan Partnership100.00% success rate1 cases14.3% of area
Gabriel Law Corporation0.00% success rate1 cases14.3% of area
Dhillon & Panoo LLC0.00% success rate1 cases14.3% of area
Harry Elias Partnership0.00% success rate1 cases14.3% of area
Attorneys Inc. LLC0.00% success rate1 cases14.3% of area
Allen & Gledhill LLP0.00% success rate1 cases14.3% of area
Muzammil Nizam & Partners0.00% success rate1 cases14.3% of area

Notable Lawyers

Leading lawyers practicing in Mitigation, ranked by case volume and success rates.

LawyerCases
Chan Michael Karfai100.00% success rate1 cases14.3% of area
Nandwani Manoj Prakash0.00% success rate1 cases14.3% of area
Nathan Shashidran0.00% success rate1 cases14.3% of area
Lim Ying Min100.00% success rate1 cases14.3% of area
Gail Wong100.00% success rate1 cases14.3% of area
Leong Lijie100.00% success rate1 cases14.3% of area
Ang Siok Chen100.00% success rate1 cases14.3% of area
Koh Kia Jeng0.00% success rate1 cases14.3% of area
Parmar Karam Singh100.00% success rate1 cases14.3% of area
Lim Dao Kai0.00% success rate1 cases14.3% of area

Recent Judgments

Displaying 7 most recent judgments out of 7 total cases

No.TitleCourtDecision DateOutcomes
1Public Prosecutor v CEJ: Abetment to Rape, Sexual Assault, and SentencingGeneral Division of the High Court of the Republic of Singapore15 Jun 2023
Accused sentenced to an aggregate imprisonment term of 29 years and to caning subject to the maximum of 24 strokes permitted by law.
2Public Prosecutor v Yap Pow Foo: Rape and House-breaking SentencingGeneral Division of the High Court30 Mar 2023
Accused sentenced to 17 years’ imprisonment and 16 strokes of the cane.
3Crescendas Bionics v Jurong Primewide: Damages for Delay in Biopolis 3 ConstructionGeneral Division of the High Court09 Aug 2021
Judgment for Plaintiff; damages awarded in the amount of $2,693,573.91
4DyStar v Kiri: Damages Assessment for Breach of Non-Compete in Dye IndustrySingapore International Commercial Court08 Jan 2020
Damages awarded to DyStar for breach of contract; quantum to be calculated based on the judgment.
5Public Prosecutor v Soh Song Soon: Sexual Assault Sentencing & MitigationHigh Court02 Nov 2009
Accused sentenced to six years imprisonment.
6PP v Aguilar Guen Garlejo: Culpable Homicide, Mental Disorder, and SentencingHigh Court28 May 2006
The accused was sentenced to a term of imprisonment of ten years.
7Public Prosecutor v Rohana: Culpable Homicide Sentencing for Maid Killing EmployerHigh Court27 Mar 2006
Accused sentenced to imprisonment for ten years.