Parol Evidence Rule
Parol Evidence Rule is a primary practice area in Singapore's legal system. This area encompasses 7 cases from 2005 to 2023.
Leading Law Firms
Analysis of law firms specializing in Parol Evidence Rule, ranked by case volume and success rates.
| Law Firm | Cases |
|---|---|
| Fernandez LLC0.00% success rate | 1 cases14.3% of area |
| Shook Lin & Bok LLP100.00% success rate | 1 cases14.3% of area |
| Drew & Napier LLC100.00% success rate | 1 cases14.3% of area |
| Wong & Leow LLC0.00% success rate | 1 cases14.3% of area |
| Covenant Chambers LLC0.00% success rate | 1 cases14.3% of area |
| Ascendant Legal LLC100.00% success rate | 1 cases14.3% of area |
| Kelvin Chia Partnership0.00% success rate | 1 cases14.3% of area |
| Prestige Legal LLP100.00% success rate | 1 cases14.3% of area |
| Godwin Campos LLC0.00% success rate | 1 cases14.3% of area |
| Straits Law Practice LLC0.00% success rate | 1 cases14.3% of area |
Notable Lawyers
Leading lawyers practicing in Parol Evidence Rule, ranked by case volume and success rates.
| Lawyer | Cases |
|---|---|
| Mohamed Arshad Bin Mohamed Tahir0.00% success rate | 1 cases14.3% of area |
| Lee Ee Yang0.00% success rate | 1 cases14.3% of area |
| Wong En Hui Charis0.00% success rate | 1 cases14.3% of area |
| Chew Kei-Jin100.00% success rate | 1 cases14.3% of area |
| Joseph Tay Weiwen100.00% success rate | 1 cases14.3% of area |
| Tan Wei Sze100.00% success rate | 1 cases14.3% of area |
| Tan Kah Wai100.00% success rate | 1 cases14.3% of area |
| Celeste Ang0.00% success rate | 1 cases14.3% of area |
| N Sreenivasan0.00% success rate | 1 cases14.3% of area |
| Patrick Fernandez0.00% success rate | 1 cases14.3% of area |
Recent Judgments
Displaying 7 most recent judgments out of 7 total cases
| No. | Title | Court | Decision Date | Outcomes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Tan Tien Sek v Tan Tien Sai: Oral Contract & Parol Evidence Rule Dispute | General Division of the High Court | 30 Mar 2023 | Claim Dismissed |
| 2 | Kelington Engineering v Gan Cheng Chuan: Parol Evidence Rule & Liquidated Damages | General Division of the High Court of the Republic of Singapore | 25 Apr 2022 | All of Kelington's claims against Mr. Gan are dismissed, save for the consent judgment for RM24,000 which has already been satisfied by Mr. Gan. |
| 3 | Marken Limited (Singapore Branch) v Scott Ohanesian: Breach of Contract of Service & Termination Without Notice | High Court of the Republic of Singapore | 19 Oct 2017 | Claim dismissed in its entirety. |
| 4 | Ling Yew Kong v Teo Vin Li Richard: Enforceability of Settlement Agreement & Illegality Defense | High Court | 08 Jan 2014 | Appeal Allowed |
| 5 | Sitt Tatt Bhd v Goh Tai Hock: Breach of Trust and Contract Dispute over Oil & Gas Project Funding | High Court | 25 Nov 2008 | Judgment for Plaintiff |
| 6 | - | 26 Jun 2008 | Unknown | |
| 7 | China Insurance v Liberty Insurance: Double Insurance & Contribution Claims | High Court | 27 Feb 2005 | Plaintiff's application dismissed. |