Business Formation

Business Formation is a primary practice area in Singapore's legal system. This area encompasses 12 cases from 2002 to 2020.

Leading Law Firms

Analysis of law firms specializing in Business Formation, ranked by case volume and success rates.

Law FirmCases
Advocatus Law LLP33.33% success rate3 cases25.0% of area
TSMP Law Corporation50.00% success rate2 cases16.7% of area
Allen & Gledhill LLP0.00% success rate2 cases16.7% of area
Morgan Lewis Stamford LLC0.00% success rate2 cases16.7% of area
Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP50.00% success rate2 cases16.7% of area
Attorney-General’s Chambers100.00% success rate1 cases8.3% of area
Engelin Teh Practice LLC100.00% success rate1 cases8.3% of area
Gavan Law Practice LLC100.00% success rate1 cases8.3% of area
Providence Law Asia LLC0.00% success rate1 cases8.3% of area
Independent Practitioner0.00% success rate1 cases8.3% of area

Notable Lawyers

Leading lawyers practicing in Business Formation, ranked by case volume and success rates.

LawyerCases
Ker Yanguang0.00% success rate1 cases8.3% of area
Harish Kumar100.00% success rate1 cases8.3% of area
Daniel Chia Hsiung Wen0.00% success rate1 cases8.3% of area
Abraham Vergis0.00% success rate1 cases8.3% of area
Hari Veluri100.00% success rate1 cases8.3% of area
Lim Mingguan0.00% success rate1 cases8.3% of area
Harjean Kaur100.00% success rate1 cases8.3% of area
Sim Kwan Kiat0.00% success rate1 cases8.3% of area
R Dilip Kumar100.00% success rate1 cases8.3% of area
Lee Eng Beng100.00% success rate1 cases8.3% of area

Recent Judgments

Displaying 12 most recent judgments out of 12 total cases

No.TitleCourtDecision DateOutcomes
1The Micro Tellers Network v Cheng Yi Han: Mareva Injunction & Fraudulent MisrepresentationHigh Court of the Republic of Singapore23 Jun 2020
Plaintiffs’ application for a worldwide Mareva injunction against the Defendants’ assets granted.
2Taylor v Sinfeng Marine: Leave to Appeal Disclosure Orders Under Companies ActHigh Court17 Oct 2019
The court declared that the respective defendants do not require leave to appeal against the Orders. In the alternative, if leave is required, the court granted such leave to appeal. The court declined to grant a stay of execution of the Orders pending the disposal of any renewed application to the Court of Appeal, subject to undertakings furnished by the plaintiffs.
3BNP Paribas SA v Jacob Agam: Enforcement of Personal Guarantees for Corporate LoansSingapore International Commercial Court16 Nov 2017
Judgment for Plaintiff
4Actis Excalibur Ltd v KS Distribution Pte Ltd: Intervention in Derivative Action for Breach of Fiduciary DutiesHigh Court of the Republic of Singapore30 Oct 2016
Leave granted for the proposed interveners to intervene in Originating Summons No 788 of 2016.
5Viknesh Dairy Farm v Balakrishnan: Mandatory Injunction, Fraud, Agency, and Earth Dumping DisputeHigh Court27 Jan 2015
Plaintiff's application against the second and third defendants for a mandatory injunction is dismissed. A mandatory injunction is issued against the first defendant.
6Re Beloff Michael Jacob QC: Ad Hoc Admission, Legal Profession Act, Schemes of ArrangementCourt of Appeal15 May 2014
Appeals allowed and the Judge’s decision to admit Mr Beloff on an ad hoc basis to represent nTan in the Setting-Aside Summonses was set aside.
7ACW v ACX: Discovery & Interrogatories for Company Documents in Divorce Ancillary MattersHigh Court08 Apr 2014
Husband’s appeal dismissed and Wife’s appeal allowed in part.
8-18 May 2011
Unknown
9Viking Airtech v Foo Teow Keng: Breach of Fiduciary Duty & Damages AssessmentHigh Court22 Jul 2009
Appeal allowed in part.
10-21 Feb 2007
Unknown
11Jumabhoy Rafiq v Scotts Investments: Director's Remuneration & Indemnification DisputeCourt of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore05 Oct 2004
Appeal Dismissed with Costs
12Banque Cantonale Vaudoise v RBG Resources: Stay of Proceedings for Non-Existent Metal CargoesHigh Court06 Nov 2002
Application for stay of proceedings dismissed in respect of the Schedule 3 claim.