Force Majeure
Force Majeure is a specialized practice area in Singapore's legal system. This area encompasses 13 cases from 2003 to 2024.
Leading Law Firms
Analysis of law firms specializing in Force Majeure, ranked by case volume and success rates.
Law Firm | Cases |
---|---|
Drew & Napier LLC33.33% success rate | 3 cases23.1% of area |
Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP66.67% success rate | 3 cases23.1% of area |
Rajah & Tann LLP66.67% success rate | 3 cases23.1% of area |
Straits Law Practice LLC0.00% success rate | 2 cases15.4% of area |
Tan Lee & Partners0.00% success rate | 2 cases15.4% of area |
Leong Partnership0.00% success rate | 2 cases15.4% of area |
Wong Tan & Molly Lim LLC0.00% success rate | 1 cases7.7% of area |
Damodara Ong LLC0.00% success rate | 1 cases7.7% of area |
Malkin & Maxwell LLP100.00% success rate | 1 cases7.7% of area |
Infinitus Law Corporation0.00% success rate | 1 cases7.7% of area |
Notable Lawyers
Leading lawyers practicing in Force Majeure, ranked by case volume and success rates.
Lawyer | Cases |
---|---|
Tan Liam Beng33.33% success rate | 3 cases23.1% of area |
Soh Chun York33.33% success rate | 3 cases23.1% of area |
Tan Kon Yeng Eugene33.33% success rate | 3 cases23.1% of area |
Por Hock Sing Michael0.00% success rate | 2 cases15.4% of area |
N Sreenivasan0.00% success rate | 2 cases15.4% of area |
Tan Yew Cheng0.00% success rate | 2 cases15.4% of area |
Tay Yong Seng100.00% success rate | 1 cases7.7% of area |
Wong Siew Hong0.00% success rate | 1 cases7.7% of area |
Devathas Satianathan100.00% success rate | 1 cases7.7% of area |
Philip Ling Daw Hoang0.00% success rate | 1 cases7.7% of area |
Recent Judgments
Displaying 13 most recent judgments out of 13 total cases
No. | Title | Court | Decision Date | Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Foreland Singapore Pte. Ltd. v IG Asia Pte. Ltd.: Force Majeure & Contract Terms in Nickel CFD Trading | General Division of the High Court | 10 Jul 2024 | Plaintiffs' claim dismissed. |
2 | Golden Pacific Shipping v Arc Marine Engineering: Negligence & Bailment in Ship Repair | High Court of the Republic of Singapore | 18 Jan 2024 | Plaintiff's claim dismissed |
3 | CJY v CJZ: Stay of Court Proceedings Pending Arbitration Over Wrongful Performance Bond Calls and Construction Defects | General Division of the High Court | 22 Mar 2021 | Case management stay granted, suit stayed pending the determination of the arbitration. |
4 | Alliance Concrete v Sato Kogyo: Sand Ban, Frustration of Contract & RMC Supply | High Court | 04 Jul 2013 | Judgment for Defendant on liability; damages to be assessed. |
5 | Holcim v Precise Development: Force Majeure & Indonesian Sand Ban Impact on Concrete Supply | Court of Appeal | 18 Jan 2011 | Appeal Allowed |
6 | D'Oz International v PSB Corp: Franchise Fee Refund Dispute Over Chinese Regulations | High Court | 17 Mar 2010 | Appeal in District Court Appeal No 11 allowed and appeal in District Court Appeal No 12 dismissed. |
7 | Precise Development v Holcim: Dispute over Concrete Supply Contract due to Indonesian Sand Ban | High Court | 16 Nov 2009 | Interlocutory judgment for the plaintiff. |
8 | Holcim v Kwan Yong: Force Majeure & Economic Duress in Concrete Supply Contract | High Court | 10 Dec 2008 | Judgment for Plaintiff; Defendant's counterclaim dismissed. |
9 | RDC Concrete v Sato Kogyo: Termination of Contract for Failure to Supply Concrete Meeting LTA Requirements | Court of Appeal | 28 Aug 2007 | Appeal allowed in part |
10 | Sato Kogyo v RDC Concrete: Breach of Contract & Force Majeure in Concrete Supply | High Court | 23 Nov 2006 | Interlocutory judgment for the plaintiff with costs on its claim; judgment for the defendant on its counterclaim with costs. |
11 | TCL Industries v ICC Chemical: Breach of Contract & Force Majeure | High Court | 29 May 2006 | Interlocutory judgment for the plaintiff. |
12 | Tesa Tape v Wing Seng: Negligence, Nuisance & Rylands v Fletcher - Container Depot Liability | High Court | 02 May 2006 | Judgment for the plaintiff with damages to be assessed. |
13 | Elan Impex v Daewoo: Wrongful Termination, Service Out of Jurisdiction, and Forum Non Conveniens | High Court | 07 Feb 2003 | Action against the first defendant and fourth defendant struck out; orders giving leave to serve outside jurisdiction set aside; interim injunctions discharged; claim against the third defendant and the Mareva injunction against him stayed. |