Oversea-Chinese Banking Corp Ltd

Oversea-Chinese Banking Corp Ltd is a corporation in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 24 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 39 counsels. Through 13 law firms. Their track record shows a 58.3% success rate in resolved cases. They have been involved in 10 complex cases, representing 41.7% of their total caseload.

Legal Representation

Oversea-Chinese Banking Corp Ltd has been represented by 13 law firms and 39 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
Rajah & Tann LLP	2 cases	Lee Eng Beng Sim Kwan Kiat Jansen Chow Adrian Wong Soon Peng Christine Huang Nelson Goh Chin Wei Lin Loke Shiu Meng Loke Pei-Shan
Rajah & Tann	4 cases	Lee Eng Beng Lynette Koh Meah Tze Hua V K Rajah Chio Yuen Lyn Karen Ng
Shook Lin and Bok	2 cases	Chua Sui Tong Vinodh Coomaraswamy V Coomaraswamy
Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP	1 case	Sim Kwan Kiat Celine Kee
Tan Rajah & Cheah	1 case	Chew Kei-Jin CS Rajah
Dentons Rodyk & Davidson LLP	1 case	Koh Kia Jeng Ooi Shu Min
Helen Yeo & Partners	1 case	Herman Jeremiah
Yeo-Leong & Peh LLC	1 case	Chooi Yue Wai Kenny Fong Kai Tong Kelvin Kong Tai Wai David Koh Jean
Drew & Napier LLC	1 case	Hri Kumar Nair Hri Kumar Wilson Wong Wilson Wong Chin Soon Kristine Ang
Rajah and Tann	1 case	K. Muralidharan Pillai Harveen Singh Vivien Teng
Tan Kok Quan Partnership	1 case	Kannan Ramesh Shalita Jayakumar
Drew and Napier LLC	1 case	Hri Kumar Wilson Wong
Shook Lin & Bok	1 case	Vinodh Coomaraswamy Georgina Lum Marcus Yip

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Oversea-Chinese Banking Corp Ltd's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.5
Complex Cases: 10 (41.7%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	54.6 parties avg	4.6	20.8%
Neutral	24.0 parties avg	4.0	8.3%
Partial	32.0 parties avg	2.0	12.5%
Won	143.4 parties avg	3.4	58.3%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2022	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2021	19.0 parties avg	9.0
2015	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2011	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2010	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2009	33.7 parties avg	3.7
2008	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2006	33.0 parties avg	3.0
2005	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2004	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2003	44.5 parties avg	4.5
2002	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2001	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2000	23.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Oversea-Chinese Banking Corp Ltd's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	5(20.8%)	20.8%
Neutral	2(8.3%)	8.3%
Partial	3(12.5%)	12.5%
Won	14(58.3%)	58.3%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	67,709,133.72	5,208,394.9013 cases	13
USD	7,538,437.75	3,769,218.882 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2022	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2011	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2010	1 2	Won: 2 cases (200.0%)
2009	3 111	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Neutral: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)
2008	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2006	3 111	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Partial: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)
2005	1 2	Won: 2 cases (200.0%)
2004	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2003	3 211	Lost: 2 cases (66.7%) Partial: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)
2002	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2001	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2000	1 2	Won: 2 cases (200.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 24 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2022-sghc-274 30 Oct 2022	30 Oct 2022	Non-party	NeutralOCBC participated in the proceedings as a non-party and a funding creditor.
2	2021-sghc-209 12 Sep 2021	12 Sep 2021	Respondent	WonOCBC's opposition to the application was successful, resulting in the dismissal of the application.
3	2015-sghc-1 01 Jan 2015	01 Jan 2015	Appellant	WonAppeal against the setting aside of the statutory demand was allowed. Costs of $3000 including disbursements awarded to the Plaintiffs. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	2011-sgca-3 20 Jan 2011	20 Jan 2011	Respondent	PartialThe substantive appeal was dismissed, but the appeal on costs was allowed against them.
5	2010-sghc-301 11 Oct 2010	11 Oct 2010	Plaintiff	WonInterlocutory judgment awarded to the plaintiff; damages to be assessed at a later stage. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
6	2010-sghc-160 24 May 2010	24 May 2010	Defendant	WonThe court ruled in favor of the defendant, Oversea-Chinese Banking Corp Ltd. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
7	2009-sghc-243 27 Oct 2009	27 Oct 2009	Defendant	NeutralOversea-Chinese Banking Corporation Ltd did not contest Soo Yen Sun’s claim (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
8	2009-sghc-159 09 Jul 2009	09 Jul 2009	Defendant	WonJudgment for the Defendant; costs awarded in the amount of $6,500 plus reasonable disbursements (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
9	2009-sghc-76 30 Mar 2009	30 Mar 2009	Plaintiff	LostThe appeal by the second defendant to set aside the default judgment was dismissed with costs fixed at $1500 and disbursements. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
10	2008-sghc-213 18 Nov 2008	18 Nov 2008	Plaintiff, Respondent	WonThe appeals by the defendant were dismissed, upholding the bankruptcy order. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
11	2006-sghc-209 19 Nov 2006	19 Nov 2006	Defendant, Respondent	LostAppeal dismissed; required to pay $1.53 million in damages (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
12	2006-sghc-147 14 Aug 2006	14 Aug 2006	Plaintiff	PartialThe defendant was ordered to provide security for $9 million as part of the sum claimed, as well as $500,000 as security for costs on an indemnity basis. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
13	2006-sghc-111 20 Jun 2006	20 Jun 2006	Plaintiff	WonJudgment was given to the plaintiff for the sums claimed, together with contractual interest and costs on an indemnity basis as provided for contractually. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
14	2005-sghc-134 28 Jul 2005	28 Jul 2005	Plaintiff, Respondent	WonAppeal dismissed; the defendant was ordered to pay the plaintiff the sum of $34,668,133.72 with interest thereon as at 12 April 2004. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
15	2005-sghc-61 29 Mar 2005	29 Mar 2005	Plaintiff	WonJudgment for the plaintiff against the first and second defendants for delivery of possession of the property, sale of the property, and repayment of loans with contractual interest (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
16	2004-sgca-20 26 Apr 2004	26 Apr 2004	Appellant	LostAppeal dismissed; the original judgment against Oversea-Chinese Banking Corp Ltd stands.
17	2003-sghc-262 28 Oct 2003	28 Oct 2003	Defendant	LostJudgment will be entered against them, with costs, and damages to be assessed by the Registrar. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
18	2003-sgca-21 15 May 2003	15 May 2003	Respondent	LostAppeal allowed, decision of single judge reviewed and varied.
19	2003-sgca-18 31 Mar 2003	31 Mar 2003	Respondent	WonAppeal stayed until costs awarded to the first respondent are paid and further security is furnished. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
20	2003-sghc-30 20 Feb 2003	20 Feb 2003	Defendant	PartialAppeal upheld in part, with one variation regarding the place where the remarks were made.
21	2002-sghc-173 07 Aug 2002	07 Aug 2002	Respondent, Plaintiff	WonJudgment for the Plaintiff for US$524,333.24, plus interest and costs (assumed USD, as the judgment refers to US dollar amounts).
22	2001-sghc-306 11 Oct 2001	11 Oct 2001	Plaintiff	WonJudgment for the plaintiffs with costs, less $84,441 for unauthorized withdrawals (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
23	2000-sghc-178 31 Aug 2000	31 Aug 2000	Defendant	WonThe plaintiff's claim against the defendant was dismissed.
24	2000-sghc-104 04 Jun 2000	04 Jun 2000	Plaintiff	WonJudgment for the plaintiff for US$7,014,104.51 (assumed USD, as the loan was denominated in US dollars).