Enforcement of Judgments
Enforcement of Judgments is a specialized practice area in Singapore's legal system. This area encompasses 10 cases from 2009 to 2015.
Leading Law Firms
Analysis of law firms specializing in Enforcement of Judgments, ranked by case volume and success rates.
Law Firm | Cases |
---|---|
Shook Lin & Bok LLP0.00% success rate | 2 cases20.0% of area |
WongPartnership LLP0.00% success rate | 1 cases10.0% of area |
Attorney-General’s Chambers0.00% success rate | 1 cases10.0% of area |
Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP0.00% success rate | 1 cases10.0% of area |
Drew & Napier LLC0.00% success rate | 1 cases10.0% of area |
Oon & Bazul LLP100.00% success rate | 1 cases10.0% of area |
Jimmy Yap & Co0.00% success rate | 1 cases10.0% of area |
Ong Ying Ping Esq0.00% success rate | 1 cases10.0% of area |
Morgan Lewis Stamford LLC100.00% success rate | 1 cases10.0% of area |
Keystone Law Corporation0.00% success rate | 1 cases10.0% of area |
Notable Lawyers
Leading lawyers practicing in Enforcement of Judgments, ranked by case volume and success rates.
Lawyer | Cases |
---|---|
Koh Junxiang0.00% success rate | 2 cases20.0% of area |
Chua Sui Tong0.00% success rate | 1 cases10.0% of area |
Ang Cheng Hock100.00% success rate | 1 cases10.0% of area |
Cai Enhuai Amos0.00% success rate | 1 cases10.0% of area |
Hon Yi0.00% success rate | 1 cases10.0% of area |
Sarjit Singh Gill0.00% success rate | 1 cases10.0% of area |
Gordon Oh0.00% success rate | 1 cases10.0% of area |
Daniel Chia100.00% success rate | 1 cases10.0% of area |
Oommen Mathew0.00% success rate | 1 cases10.0% of area |
Kronenburg Edmund Jerome0.00% success rate | 1 cases10.0% of area |
Recent Judgments
Displaying 10 most recent judgments out of 10 total cases
No. | Title | Court | Decision Date | Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Motorola Solutions v Uzan: Common Interest Privilege and Waiver in Enforcing Foreign Judgments | High Court | 02 Sep 2015 | Declaration granted that the Applicants were entitled to claim legal privilege over the Emails; injunction granted restraining the plaintiff from using the Emails against the Applicants in this action; order granted striking out references to the Emails in the 13th Affidavit. |
2 | Chan Shwe Ching v Leong Lai Yee: Enforceability of Writ of Seizure and Sale on Jointly Owned Property | High Court | 11 Aug 2015 | Application allowed for the defendant's interest in the property to be attached and taken in execution to satisfy the judgment debt. |
3 | Lim Giok Boon v Lim Geok Cheng: Sisters' Dispute over Business Ownership, Joint Account, and Loans | High Court | 05 Aug 2015 | Judgment for Plaintiff in part; Counterclaim Dismissed |
4 | Equatorial Marine v. Bunga Melati 5: Agency, Bunker Supply, & Shipowner Liability | High Court | 21 Jul 2015 | Plaintiff's claim dismissed with costs. |
5 | Public Prosecutor v Sollihin bin Anhar: Revocation of Bail and Standard of Proof | Court of Appeal | 29 Mar 2015 | Matter remitted to the State Courts for reconsideration of the prosecution’s application for revocation of bail. |
6 | Indian Overseas Bank v Svil Agro: Breach of Guarantee & Enforceability of Judgments | High Court | 29 May 2014 | Judgment for Plaintiff |
7 | Chen Chun Kang v Zhao Meirong: Enforcement of Default Judgment & False Representation | High Court | 13 Dec 2011 | Hearing of Summons adjourned to allow the Defendant a final opportunity to apply to set aside the Default Judgment. |
8 | Doshion Ltd v Sembawang Engineers: Dispute Over Settlement Agreement and Arbitration Termination | High Court | 27 Feb 2011 | Plaintiff's application dismissed. |
9 | Navigator Investment Services Ltd v Acclaim Insurance Brokers: Arbitration Stay & Pre-Action Discovery | Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore | 28 Sep 2009 | Appeal against the decision in Summons 5059 allowed, but appeal against the decision in Registrar’s Appeal 383 dismissed. |
10 | DB Trustees v Consult Asia: Enforcement of Trust Deed, Security Deed & Moneylenders Act | High Court | 12 Mar 2009 | Plaintiff's application dismissed with costs; receivers discharged; defendant to pay US$42,080,000 to redeem notes by 2009-04-29 with simultaneous release of secured assets, failing which an Event of Default shall be deemed to have occurred. |