DBS Bank Ltd
DBS Bank Ltd is a corporation in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 31 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 46 counsels. Through 13 law firms. Their track record shows a 35.5% success rate in resolved cases. They have been involved in 11 complex cases, representing 35.5% of their total caseload.
Legal Representation
DBS Bank Ltd has been represented by 13 law firms and 46 counsels.
| Law Firm | Cases Handled |
|---|---|
| Rajah & Tann LLP | 2 cases |
| Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP | 1 case |
| Shook Lin & Bok LLP | 2 cases |
| Advocatus Law LLP | 1 case |
| WongPartnership LLP | 1 case |
| Stamford Law Corporation | 1 case |
| Rodyk & Davidson LLP | 1 case |
| Rodyk & Davidson LLC | 1 case |
| Allen & Gledhill LLP | 4 cases |
| Drew & Napier LLC | 2 cases |
| Adsan Law LLC | 2 cases |
| Yeo-Leong & Peh LLC | 1 case |
| Harry Elias Partnership LLP | 1 case |
Case Complexity Analysis
Analysis of DBS Bank Ltd's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.
Complexity Overview
- Average Parties per Case
- 4.4
- Complex Cases
- 11 (35.5%)
- Cases with more than 3 parties
Complexity by Case Type
| Type | Cases |
|---|---|
| Dismissed | 14.0 parties avg |
| Lost | 73.1 parties avg |
| Neutral | 96.4 parties avg |
| Partial | 32.7 parties avg |
| Won | 114.1 parties avg |
Complexity Trends Over Time
| Year | Cases |
|---|---|
| 2024 | 55.6 parties avg |
| 2023 | 28.0 parties avg |
| 2021 | 23.0 parties avg |
| 2019 | 24.5 parties avg |
| 2018 | 26.5 parties avg |
| 2017 | 118.0 parties avg |
| 2016 | 14.0 parties avg |
| 2015 | 22.5 parties avg |
| 2014 | 12.0 parties avg |
| 2012 | 33.7 parties avg |
| 2011 | 22.0 parties avg |
| 2010 | 52.4 parties avg |
| 2008 | 33.0 parties avg |
Case Outcome Analytics
Analysis of DBS Bank Ltd's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.
Outcome Distribution
| Outcome Type | Cases |
|---|---|
| Dismissed | 1(3.2%) |
| Lost | 7(22.6%) |
| Neutral | 9(29.0%) |
| Partial | 3(9.7%) |
| Won | 11(35.5%) |
Monetary Outcomes
| Currency | Average |
|---|---|
| SGD | 141,221.4314 cases |
| USD | 1,171,678.021 cases |
Yearly Outcome Trends
| Year | Total Cases |
|---|---|
| 2024 | 3 122 |
| 2023 | 2 11 |
| 2021 | 1 2 |
| 2019 | 1 2 |
| 2018 | 1 2 |
| 2017 | 1 1 |
| 2016 | 1 1 |
| 2015 | 2 11 |
| 2014 | 1 1 |
| 2012 | 1 3 |
| 2011 | 2 11 |
| 2010 | 4 1121 |
| 2008 | 3 111 |
Case History
Displaying all 31 cases
| Case | Role | Outcome |
|---|---|---|
12 Nov 2024 | Defendant | WonThe claimant's application was dismissed. |
14 Oct 2024 | Non-party | NeutralThe judgment does not specify an outcome for this party. |
03 Sep 2024 | Non-party | NeutralDBS Bank Ltd was a non-party to the application and agreed to the terms of the order sought by the applicant pursuant to s 175(1) of the EA. |
25 Feb 2024 | Respondent | WonDBS's objection to the applications was upheld, and the applications were dismissed. |
15 Feb 2024 | Non-Party, Respondent | LostDBS's application for the monies in Neptun's account to be released from attachment was dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
17 Aug 2023 | Respondent | NeutralDBS Bank Ltd objected to the moratorium application. |
09 Apr 2023 | Claimant | LostBankruptcy application dismissed; ordered to pay costs of $100 to the Defendant (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore). |
25 Nov 2021 | Respondent, Plaintiff | WonAppeal allowed; respondent awarded indemnity costs of $30,000 from the appellants (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore). |
09 Jun 2021 | Plaintiff, Respondent | WonAppeal dismissed, order below affirmed. The defendants to pay S$7,000 in costs to the plaintiff. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
14 Oct 2019 | Applicant | NeutralDBS Bank Ltd filed an interpleader application to determine the claims to the balance sale proceeds of a property. |
29 May 2019 | Respondent | NeutralThe Second Respondent, DBS Bank Ltd, which issued the banker's guarantee, did not participate in these proceedings as it needed only to comply with the Court’s directions. |
02 Sep 2018 | Defendant | NeutralThe outcome for DBS Bank Ltd was neutral as they were the obligor under the performance bond and were not actively involved in the dispute. |
15 Mar 2018 | Defendant | NeutralShare of sales proceeds determined by the rolling charge method. (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore) |
01 Mar 2017 | Defendant | WonEntitled to claim proceeds from the sale of pepper stock in proportion to their contribution. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore). |
29 May 2016 | Garnishee | WonThe appeal against the Assistant Registrar's decision was allowed, meaning DBS Bank Ltd won and is not required to garnish the joint account. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
30 Jul 2015 | Defendant | WonThe court found in favor of the defendant, dismissing the plaintiff's claim. |
21 Apr 2015 | Respondent | NeutralDBS took a neutral position and did not make any submissions. |
13 Aug 2014 | Plaintiff | WonWinding up order granted in favour of DBS Bank Ltd. Costs of the proceedings were also ordered to be agreed or taxed and paid to the plaintiffs out of the assets of the defendants. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
19 Jul 2012 | Defendant | LostDefendant's counterclaim for invalidating the Patent is dismissed (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore). |
17 Apr 2012 | Respondent | LostAppeal dismissed, injunction restraining the Banks from making payment to Master Marine AS under the New Demand discharged. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
04 Apr 2012 | Defendant, Respondent | LostAppeal for summary judgment and to strike out the defence and counterclaim was dismissed. |
01 Nov 2011 | Respondent | WonThe appeal was dismissed with costs to the respondent. |
15 Sep 2011 | Appellant | LostAppeal dismissed with costs. |
09 Dec 2010 | Defendant | WonThe plaintiffs' claim for a declaration that the Notes issued under the HN5 contract are void is dismissed. |
17 Nov 2010 | Defendant | LostJudgment against the Defendant; the defendant shall pay JHTI the total net sale proceeds received from the disposal of the MAP Shares (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore). |
20 Jul 2010 | Plaintiff, Appellant | PartialDBS's application for further discovery was partially successful. Yamazaki's appeal in respect of categories (a), (c) – (e), and (h) was dismissed, but its appeal for category (b) was allowed. DBS’ appeal for disclosure of categories (c), (f) and (g) was dismissed. |
21 Feb 2010 | Respondent | PartialJudgment be given for the Respondent to the extent of 30 per cent of its claim against the Appellant, and that the Appellant be granted leave to defend the remaining 70 per cent of the same. |
28 Jan 2010 | Defendant | NeutralDefendant's counterclaim for contribution was dismissed with costs fixed at $2,000. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
09 Nov 2008 | Defendant | DismissedActions vis-à-vis DBS were discontinued by Compact. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
20 Oct 2008 | Plaintiff, Respondent | PartialAppeal dismissed with a variation of the judgment sum awarded to the plaintiff against the second defendant. The judgment sum was reduced by the net sales proceeds of the 26 machines recovered and sold by the plaintiff. Interest was ordered at 5.33% per annum on the sum of $1.94m from the date of disbursement of the loan until the date of sale of the 26 machines and thereafter on the net amount after deduction of the net sales proceeds. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
08 Apr 2008 | Plaintiff | WonThe court found Carrier liable in damages for fraudulent misrepresentation to DBS in the sum of US$1,395,748.02 less the benefit received in the sum of US$224,070. Assumed USD, as the judgment involves transactions in USD. |