Singapore Telecommunications Ltd

Singapore Telecommunications Ltd is a corporation in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 11 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 24 counsels. Through 5 law firms. Their track record shows a 63.6% success rate in resolved cases.

Legal Representation

Singapore Telecommunications Ltd has been represented by 5 law firms and 24 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
Allen & Gledhill	1 case	Tan Chuan Thye Prakash Pillai Muthu Arusu Michael Hwang SC K Shanmugam Marcus Yip Jules Sher Michael Jacob Beloff QC
Rajah & Tann LLP	1 case	Mohammed Reza Alina Chia Dawn Tan Ly-Ru Tang Hui Jing Julian Soong
Drew & Napier LLC	1 case	Paul Teo Gill Dedar Singh Roe Yun Song
Tan Kok Quan Partnership	2 cases	Kannan Ramesh Cheryl Koh Sean Tan Claudia Poon Sean Tan Kim Kang Tan Kok Quan Lam Sin Yee
Rajah & Tann	1 case	Dawn Tan Julian Soong

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Singapore Telecommunications Ltd's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0.0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	22.0 parties avg	2.0	18.2%
Partial	22.0 parties avg	2.0	18.2%
Won	72.0 parties avg	2.0	63.6%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2011	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2010	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2009	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2007	32.0 parties avg	2.0
2006	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2005	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2002	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2000	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Singapore Telecommunications Ltd's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(18.2%)	18.2%
Partial	2(18.2%)	18.2%
Won	7(63.6%)	63.6%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	1,719,211.90	245,601.707 cases	7

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2011	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2010	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2009	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2007	2 21	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2006	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2005	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2002	1 2	Won: 2 cases (200.0%)
2000	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 11 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2011-sghc-147 07 Jun 2011	07 Jun 2011	Plaintiff	WonJudgment for the plaintiff for US$350,672.12 plus interest at the rate of 2% per month from 28 April 2007 and US$141,010.34 plus interest at the rate of 2% per month from 28 December 2006, and indemnity costs fixed at $6,351.70 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	2010-sghc-215 01 Aug 2010	01 Aug 2010	Defendant, Appellant	WonJudgment in favor of Singtel in the sum of $1,719,211.90, with interest from the date of writ to date of judgment at 5.33% per annum. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	2009-sghc-137 04 Jun 2009	04 Jun 2009	Defendant, Respondent	WonPlaintiff's claims for trade mark infringement and invalidation of defendant's trade marks were dismissed with costs to the defendant. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	2007-sghc-118 19 Jul 2007	19 Jul 2007	Plaintiff	LostThe plaintiff's application for a further extension of time to file affidavits was substantially rejected.
5	2007-sghc-119 19 Jul 2007	19 Jul 2007	Plaintiff, Appellant	PartialThe plaintiff's application for extension of time to file reply affidavits was granted in part for Mr. S P Slattery's affidavit but denied for the affidavits responding to the defendant's experts. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
6	2007-sghc-22 14 Feb 2007	14 Feb 2007	Defendant, Appellant	LostAppeal dismissed in part in relation to paragraphs 19, 19(a) – (d) and Prayer 3 of the Defence and Counterclaim. Costs be in the cause. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
7	2006-sgca-5 05 Feb 2006	05 Feb 2006	Appellant	WonAppeal allowed with costs; judgment on liability entered in favor of SingTel and for damages to be assessed. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
8	2005-sghc-80 27 Apr 2005	27 Apr 2005	Plaintiff	PartialJudgment for Plaintiff; damages not recoverable due to Article 8.5(a). Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
9	2002-sghc-119 29 May 2002	29 May 2002	Defendant	WonJudgment in favour of the defendant. The judgment does not specify a currency, so the currency of the jurisdiction (Singapore) is assumed.
10	2002-sghc-95 01 May 2002	01 May 2002	Defendant, Appellant	WonDefendant's appeal was allowed.
11	2000-sghc-84 09 May 2000	09 May 2000	Defendant	WonJudgment in favour of the defendant; the plaintiffs' claim was dismissed with costs.