Patents
Patents is a primary practice area in Singapore's legal system. This area encompasses 71 cases from 2000 to 2024.
Leading Law Firms
Analysis of law firms specializing in Patents, ranked by case volume and success rates.
Law Firm | Cases |
---|---|
Allen & Gledhill LLP23.08% success rate | 13 cases18.3% of area |
Drew & Napier LLC18.18% success rate | 11 cases15.5% of area |
Infinitus Law Corporation45.45% success rate | 11 cases15.5% of area |
Eldan Law LLP33.33% success rate | 9 cases12.7% of area |
Mirandah Law LLP55.56% success rate | 9 cases12.7% of area |
Rodyk & Davidson LLP37.50% success rate | 8 cases11.3% of area |
Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP50.00% success rate | 8 cases11.3% of area |
Amica Law LLC16.67% success rate | 6 cases8.5% of area |
Tan Kok Quan Partnership16.67% success rate | 6 cases8.5% of area |
Rajah & Tann LLP40.00% success rate | 5 cases7.0% of area |
Notable Lawyers
Leading lawyers practicing in Patents, ranked by case volume and success rates.
Lawyer | Cases |
---|---|
Wong Siew Hong47.06% success rate | 16 cases22.5% of area |
Vignesh Vaerhn30.00% success rate | 10 cases14.1% of area |
Koh Chia Ling27.27% success rate | 10 cases14.1% of area |
Jevon Louis44.44% success rate | 8 cases11.3% of area |
Jason Chan12.50% success rate | 7 cases9.9% of area |
Tony Yeo77.78% success rate | 7 cases9.9% of area |
Suhaimi Bin Lazim62.50% success rate | 7 cases9.9% of area |
Leow Jiamin50.00% success rate | 6 cases8.5% of area |
Low Chai Chong55.56% success rate | 6 cases8.5% of area |
Foo Maw Jiun40.00% success rate | 5 cases7.0% of area |
Recent Judgments
Displaying 50 most recent judgments out of 71 total cases
No. | Title | Court | Decision Date | Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | TOWA Corp v ASMPT: Patent Infringement Damages Assessment Appeal | Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore | 21 Nov 2024 | Appeal allowed in part and dismissed in part. |
2 | Millennium Pharmaceuticals v Zyfas Medical: Patent Infringement, Bortezomib Synthesis & Validity | General Division of the High Court | 28 Dec 2023 | One patent valid but not infringed, and the other patent invalid for lack of inventive step. |
3 | IIa Technologies v Element Six: Patent Invalidity & Infringement in CVD Diamond Production | Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore | 16 Feb 2023 | Appeal Allowed |
4 | Nippon Shinyaku Co v Registrar of Patents: Patent Specification Correction Dispute | General Division of the High Court of the Republic of Singapore | 13 Jul 2022 | Appeal Allowed |
5 | Kiri Industries v Senda International Capital: Share Valuation & Oppression | Singapore International Commercial Court | 02 Jun 2021 | Final valuation of DyStar Global Holdings (Singapore) Pte Ltd to be determined based on the court's conclusions. |
6 | Zyfas Medical v Millennium Pharmaceuticals: Patent Declaration & Therapeutic Product Registration | Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore | 26 Aug 2020 | Appeal Dismissed |
7 | Element Six Technologies Ltd v IIa Technologies Pte Ltd: Patent Infringement & Validity Dispute | High Court of the Republic of Singapore | 21 Jul 2020 | Judgment for Plaintiff |
8 | Millennium Pharmaceuticals v Zyfas Medical: Statutory Interpretation & Patent Disclosure | High Court of the Republic of Singapore | 06 Feb 2020 | Declaration granted to the plaintiff that the defendant's declaration omitted to disclose matter that is material to its application for registration of its therapeutic product. |
9 | Element Six Technologies Ltd v IIa Technologies Pte Ltd: CVD Diamond Patents, Validity, and Infringement | High Court of the Republic of Singapore | 06 Feb 2020 | Judgment for Plaintiff in part; Judgment for Defendant in part |
10 | Sun Electric v Sunseap: Security for Costs in Patent Infringement Suits | High Court of the Republic of Singapore | 21 Jan 2020 | The Plaintiff was ordered to furnish security for costs. Proceedings stayed until security is provided. |
11 | Sun Electric v Sunseap: Patent Infringement, Interrogatories, and Particulars | High Court of the Republic of Singapore | 26 Aug 2019 | The court declined to order the withdrawal of the Interrogatories, with amendments to some interrogatories. The Plaintiff is to file further and better particulars after receipt of the Defendants’ answers to the Interrogatories. |
12 | Millennium Pharmaceuticals v Drug Houses of Australia: Patent Infringement & Injunctions | Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore | 29 Apr 2019 | Civil Appeal No 79 of 2018 allowed; Civil Appeal No 84 of 2018 dismissed. |
13 | Sun Electric v Sunseap: Pleadings, Particulars, & Patent Infringement | High Court of the Republic of Singapore | 18 Feb 2019 | Application for further and better particulars granted in part and dismissed in part; alternative prayer for striking out dismissed. |
14 | Sunseap v Sun Electric: High Court's Jurisdiction in Patent Revocation Proceedings | Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore | 09 Jan 2019 | Appeal Allowed |
15 | Cicada Cube Pte Ltd v National University Hospital: Patent Ownership Dispute | Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore | 27 Aug 2018 | Appeals Dismissed |
16 | Element Six Technologies Ltd v IIa Technologies Pte Ltd: Discovery of Documents in Patent Litigation | High Court of the Republic of Singapore | 26 Aug 2018 | Request 2 and Request 4(i) granted in part. Request 4(ii) disallowed, but explanation on affidavit ordered. Requests 3, 5, and 6 disallowed. |
17 | Lee Tat Cheng v Maka GPS Technologies: Patent Infringement & Groundless Threat of Proceedings | Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore | 05 Apr 2018 | Appeal allowed in part. |
18 | ASM Technology v Towa Corporation: Patent Infringement & Modularity | Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore | 04 Jan 2018 | Appeal Dismissed |
19 | Novartis v Bristol-Myers Squibb: Patent Register Rectification | High Court of the Republic of Singapore | 19 Dec 2017 | Application allowed with costs. |
20 | - | 07 Dec 2017 | Unknown | |
21 | Element Six Technologies Ltd v IIa Technologies Pte Ltd: Patent Infringement, Novelty, and Pleadings | High Court of the Republic of Singapore | 18 Oct 2017 | Combination Requests and Passage Requests allowed; Commercial Success Requests disallowed. |
22 | Sun Electric Pte Ltd v Sunseap Group Pte Ltd: Patent Revocation & High Court Jurisdiction | High Court of Singapore | 27 Sep 2017 | Appeal Allowed |
23 | Warner-Lambert v Novartis: Patent Amendment, Industrial Application & Novelty | Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore | 31 Jul 2017 | Appeal dismissed |
24 | Sun Electric v Sunseap: Patent Validity, Groundless Threats, and Revocation | High Court of the Republic of Singapore | 03 May 2017 | Application to strike out parts of the Defence and Counterclaim and the Particulars of Objection is declined. The Defendants are ordered to amend paragraphs 4, 14 and 16 of the Defence and Counterclaim. |
25 | National University Hospital v Cicada Cube: Patent Ownership Dispute over Laboratory Specimen Collection System | High Court of the Republic of Singapore | 13 Mar 2017 | Ordered that Dr. Sethi, Dr. Ratty and Dr. Poo be named as joint inventors of the invention, and for NUH to be named as a joint proprietor of the Patent together with Cicada. |
26 | Lee Tat Cheng v Maka GPS Technologies: Patent Infringement, Validity & Groundless Threat | High Court of the Republic of Singapore | 12 Mar 2017 | Judgment for Defendant on non-infringement; Injunction granted to Defendant against Plaintiff's groundless threats. |
27 | Main-Line Corp v UOB & First Currency Choice: Patent Infringement, Damages Assessment | High Court of the Republic of Singapore | 27 Dec 2016 | Judgment for Plaintiff against First Currency Choice Pte Ltd; No further award against United Overseas Bank Ltd. |
28 | Towa Corp v ASM Technology: Patent Infringement, Moulding Machine, Inventive Step | High Court | 21 Dec 2016 | Judgment for Plaintiff |
29 | Warner-Lambert v Novartis: Patent Amendment, Industrial Application & Novelty in Pharmaceutical Patent Dispute | High Court of the Republic of Singapore | 25 May 2016 | Application to amend the patent in suit is dismissed with costs to the defendant. |
30 | Ship's Equipment Centre Bremen GmbH v Fuji Trading: Patent Infringement & Validity of Twistlock Coupling Device | High Court | 22 Jun 2015 | Plaintiff's applications to amend the patents dismissed. |
31 | Towa Corp v ASM Technology: Specific Discovery in Patent Infringement Suit | High Court | 01 Feb 2015 | Defendants' application dismissed in its entirety. Plaintiff's application granted in part. |
32 | Syntroleum v Neste Oil: Patent Infringement, Validity, and Disclosure | High Court | 29 Sep 2014 | Defendant's applications dismissed without prejudice. |
33 | Towa Corp v ASM Tech: Patent Infringement & Inspection of IDEALmold Machine | High Court | 07 Aug 2014 | Plaintiff's application dismissed. |
34 | Energenics Pte Ltd v Musse Singapore Pte Ltd: Inventorship Rights & Patents Act Dispute | High Court | 18 Jul 2013 | Application to strike out paragraphs of the Statement of Claim in Suit 383 granted; application to amend Reply in Suit 577 denied. |
35 | AstraZeneca v Sanofi-Aventis: Patent Infringement, Medicines Act & Pharmaceutical Compositions | High Court | 14 Mar 2013 | Application allowed in part. AstraZeneca was ordered to provide further particulars regarding its patent infringement claim. |
36 | Novartis v Ranbaxy: Patent Amendment, Valsartan, Pharmaceutical Preparations, Singapore | High Court | 27 Dec 2012 | Prayer 1 of the plaintiffs’ application is granted in terms. |
37 | Main-Line Corporate Holdings Ltd v DBS Bank Ltd: Patent Infringement & Dynamic Currency Conversion | High Court | 19 Jul 2012 | Judgment for Plaintiff |
38 | Martek v Cargill: Arachidonic Acid Patent Validity - Novelty & Inventive Step | High Court | 15 Feb 2012 | Appeal Allowed |
39 | AstraZeneca v Sanofi-Aventis: Patent Infringement, Medicines Act s12A, Product Licensing | High Court | 18 Jan 2012 | Application dismissed |
40 | AstraZeneca AB v Ranbaxy: Striking Out Defence and Counterclaim in Patent Infringement Suit | High Court | 12 Jan 2012 | Application granted; disputed pleadings in the Defence and Counterclaim struck out. |
41 | Main-Line v UOB & FCC: Patent Infringement, Dynamic Currency Conversion, Account of Profits | High Court | 19 Dec 2011 | Account of profits ordered against United Overseas Bank Limited; claim for damages against First Currency Choice Pte Ltd for infringing use outside Singapore struck out. |
42 | Martek v Cargill: Patent Revocation, Microbial Oil Mixtures, and Infant Formula Supplementation | High Court | 28 Mar 2011 | Applicant's appeal against the Tribunal's decision in the Revocation Proceedings is allowed. Both parties' appeal and cross-appeal against the Tribunal's decision in the Amendment Proceedings are dismissed, except regarding Claim 42 and consequently Claim 45 in the Proposed 2006 Amendments. |
43 | Martek v Cargill: Patent Revocation Appeal - Adducing Further Evidence | Court of Appeal | 27 Dec 2010 | Appeal dismissed with costs and the usual consequential orders. |
44 | Martek Biosciences Corp v Cargill: Patent Revocation Appeal - Adducing Further Evidence | High Court | 02 May 2010 | Application dismissed with costs. |
45 | Main-Line Corporate Holdings Ltd v United Overseas Bank Ltd: Patent Infringement & Interim Payment | Court of Appeal | 02 Mar 2010 | Appeal Allowed |
46 | Mühlbauer AG v Manufacturing Integration Technology Ltd: Patent Validity & Infringement | Court of Appeal | 22 Feb 2010 | Appeal Allowed |
47 | Hoya Corp v Asahi Glass Co Ltd: Patent Infringement Dispute over Glass Lens Rim | High Court | 13 Jan 2010 | Appeal allowed in part. |
48 | Main-Line Corporate Holdings Ltd v United Overseas Bank Ltd: Election of Remedies for Patent Infringement | High Court | 15 Oct 2009 | Appeals Allowed |
49 | Main-Line Corporate Holdings v United Overseas Bank: Patent Infringement & Interim Payments | High Court | 22 Sep 2009 | First defendant's appeal allowed; plaintiff's appeal dismissed. |
50 | ASM Assembly Automation Ltd v Aurigin Technology: Patent Infringement & Validity in Solder Ball Placement Technology | High Court | 15 Sep 2009 | ASM's patent was revoked, and an injunction was granted to restrain ASM from threatening Aurigin with legal proceedings for patent infringement. Aurigin is entitled to damages and costs. |