Patents

Patents is a primary practice area in Singapore's legal system. This area encompasses 71 cases from 2000 to 2024.

Leading Law Firms

Analysis of law firms specializing in Patents, ranked by case volume and success rates.

Law FirmCases
Allen & Gledhill LLP23.08% success rate13 cases18.3% of area
Drew & Napier LLC18.18% success rate11 cases15.5% of area
Infinitus Law Corporation45.45% success rate11 cases15.5% of area
Eldan Law LLP33.33% success rate9 cases12.7% of area
Mirandah Law LLP55.56% success rate9 cases12.7% of area
Rodyk & Davidson LLP37.50% success rate8 cases11.3% of area
Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP50.00% success rate8 cases11.3% of area
Amica Law LLC16.67% success rate6 cases8.5% of area
Tan Kok Quan Partnership16.67% success rate6 cases8.5% of area
Rajah & Tann LLP40.00% success rate5 cases7.0% of area

Notable Lawyers

Leading lawyers practicing in Patents, ranked by case volume and success rates.

LawyerCases
Wong Siew Hong47.06% success rate16 cases22.5% of area
Vignesh Vaerhn30.00% success rate10 cases14.1% of area
Koh Chia Ling27.27% success rate10 cases14.1% of area
Jevon Louis44.44% success rate8 cases11.3% of area
Jason Chan12.50% success rate7 cases9.9% of area
Tony Yeo77.78% success rate7 cases9.9% of area
Suhaimi Bin Lazim62.50% success rate7 cases9.9% of area
Leow Jiamin50.00% success rate6 cases8.5% of area
Low Chai Chong55.56% success rate6 cases8.5% of area
Foo Maw Jiun40.00% success rate5 cases7.0% of area

Recent Judgments

Displaying 50 most recent judgments out of 71 total cases

No.TitleCourtDecision DateOutcomes
1TOWA Corp v ASMPT: Patent Infringement Damages Assessment AppealCourt of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore21 Nov 2024
Appeal allowed in part and dismissed in part.
2Millennium Pharmaceuticals v Zyfas Medical: Patent Infringement, Bortezomib Synthesis & ValidityGeneral Division of the High Court28 Dec 2023
One patent valid but not infringed, and the other patent invalid for lack of inventive step.
3IIa Technologies v Element Six: Patent Invalidity & Infringement in CVD Diamond ProductionCourt of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore16 Feb 2023
Appeal Allowed
4Nippon Shinyaku Co v Registrar of Patents: Patent Specification Correction DisputeGeneral Division of the High Court of the Republic of Singapore13 Jul 2022
Appeal Allowed
5Kiri Industries v Senda International Capital: Share Valuation & OppressionSingapore International Commercial Court02 Jun 2021
Final valuation of DyStar Global Holdings (Singapore) Pte Ltd to be determined based on the court's conclusions.
6Zyfas Medical v Millennium Pharmaceuticals: Patent Declaration & Therapeutic Product RegistrationCourt of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore26 Aug 2020
Appeal Dismissed
7Element Six Technologies Ltd v IIa Technologies Pte Ltd: Patent Infringement & Validity DisputeHigh Court of the Republic of Singapore21 Jul 2020
Judgment for Plaintiff
8Millennium Pharmaceuticals v Zyfas Medical: Statutory Interpretation & Patent DisclosureHigh Court of the Republic of Singapore06 Feb 2020
Declaration granted to the plaintiff that the defendant's declaration omitted to disclose matter that is material to its application for registration of its therapeutic product.
9Element Six Technologies Ltd v IIa Technologies Pte Ltd: CVD Diamond Patents, Validity, and InfringementHigh Court of the Republic of Singapore06 Feb 2020
Judgment for Plaintiff in part; Judgment for Defendant in part
10Sun Electric v Sunseap: Security for Costs in Patent Infringement SuitsHigh Court of the Republic of Singapore21 Jan 2020
The Plaintiff was ordered to furnish security for costs. Proceedings stayed until security is provided.
11Sun Electric v Sunseap: Patent Infringement, Interrogatories, and ParticularsHigh Court of the Republic of Singapore26 Aug 2019
The court declined to order the withdrawal of the Interrogatories, with amendments to some interrogatories. The Plaintiff is to file further and better particulars after receipt of the Defendants’ answers to the Interrogatories.
12Millennium Pharmaceuticals v Drug Houses of Australia: Patent Infringement & InjunctionsCourt of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore29 Apr 2019
Civil Appeal No 79 of 2018 allowed; Civil Appeal No 84 of 2018 dismissed.
13Sun Electric v Sunseap: Pleadings, Particulars, & Patent InfringementHigh Court of the Republic of Singapore18 Feb 2019
Application for further and better particulars granted in part and dismissed in part; alternative prayer for striking out dismissed.
14Sunseap v Sun Electric: High Court's Jurisdiction in Patent Revocation ProceedingsCourt of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore09 Jan 2019
Appeal Allowed
15Cicada Cube Pte Ltd v National University Hospital: Patent Ownership DisputeCourt of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore27 Aug 2018
Appeals Dismissed
16Element Six Technologies Ltd v IIa Technologies Pte Ltd: Discovery of Documents in Patent LitigationHigh Court of the Republic of Singapore26 Aug 2018
Request 2 and Request 4(i) granted in part. Request 4(ii) disallowed, but explanation on affidavit ordered. Requests 3, 5, and 6 disallowed.
17Lee Tat Cheng v Maka GPS Technologies: Patent Infringement & Groundless Threat of ProceedingsCourt of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore05 Apr 2018
Appeal allowed in part.
18ASM Technology v Towa Corporation: Patent Infringement & ModularityCourt of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore04 Jan 2018
Appeal Dismissed
19Novartis v Bristol-Myers Squibb: Patent Register RectificationHigh Court of the Republic of Singapore19 Dec 2017
Application allowed with costs.
20-07 Dec 2017
Unknown
21Element Six Technologies Ltd v IIa Technologies Pte Ltd: Patent Infringement, Novelty, and PleadingsHigh Court of the Republic of Singapore18 Oct 2017
Combination Requests and Passage Requests allowed; Commercial Success Requests disallowed.
22Sun Electric Pte Ltd v Sunseap Group Pte Ltd: Patent Revocation & High Court JurisdictionHigh Court of Singapore27 Sep 2017
Appeal Allowed
23Warner-Lambert v Novartis: Patent Amendment, Industrial Application & NoveltyCourt of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore31 Jul 2017
Appeal dismissed
24Sun Electric v Sunseap: Patent Validity, Groundless Threats, and RevocationHigh Court of the Republic of Singapore03 May 2017
Application to strike out parts of the Defence and Counterclaim and the Particulars of Objection is declined. The Defendants are ordered to amend paragraphs 4, 14 and 16 of the Defence and Counterclaim.
25National University Hospital v Cicada Cube: Patent Ownership Dispute over Laboratory Specimen Collection SystemHigh Court of the Republic of Singapore13 Mar 2017
Ordered that Dr. Sethi, Dr. Ratty and Dr. Poo be named as joint inventors of the invention, and for NUH to be named as a joint proprietor of the Patent together with Cicada.
26Lee Tat Cheng v Maka GPS Technologies: Patent Infringement, Validity & Groundless ThreatHigh Court of the Republic of Singapore12 Mar 2017
Judgment for Defendant on non-infringement; Injunction granted to Defendant against Plaintiff's groundless threats.
27Main-Line Corp v UOB & First Currency Choice: Patent Infringement, Damages AssessmentHigh Court of the Republic of Singapore27 Dec 2016
Judgment for Plaintiff against First Currency Choice Pte Ltd; No further award against United Overseas Bank Ltd.
28Towa Corp v ASM Technology: Patent Infringement, Moulding Machine, Inventive StepHigh Court21 Dec 2016
Judgment for Plaintiff
29Warner-Lambert v Novartis: Patent Amendment, Industrial Application & Novelty in Pharmaceutical Patent DisputeHigh Court of the Republic of Singapore25 May 2016
Application to amend the patent in suit is dismissed with costs to the defendant.
30Ship's Equipment Centre Bremen GmbH v Fuji Trading: Patent Infringement & Validity of Twistlock Coupling DeviceHigh Court22 Jun 2015
Plaintiff's applications to amend the patents dismissed.
31Towa Corp v ASM Technology: Specific Discovery in Patent Infringement SuitHigh Court01 Feb 2015
Defendants' application dismissed in its entirety. Plaintiff's application granted in part.
32Syntroleum v Neste Oil: Patent Infringement, Validity, and DisclosureHigh Court29 Sep 2014
Defendant's applications dismissed without prejudice.
33Towa Corp v ASM Tech: Patent Infringement & Inspection of IDEALmold MachineHigh Court07 Aug 2014
Plaintiff's application dismissed.
34Energenics Pte Ltd v Musse Singapore Pte Ltd: Inventorship Rights & Patents Act DisputeHigh Court18 Jul 2013
Application to strike out paragraphs of the Statement of Claim in Suit 383 granted; application to amend Reply in Suit 577 denied.
35AstraZeneca v Sanofi-Aventis: Patent Infringement, Medicines Act & Pharmaceutical CompositionsHigh Court14 Mar 2013
Application allowed in part. AstraZeneca was ordered to provide further particulars regarding its patent infringement claim.
36Novartis v Ranbaxy: Patent Amendment, Valsartan, Pharmaceutical Preparations, SingaporeHigh Court27 Dec 2012
Prayer 1 of the plaintiffs’ application is granted in terms.
37Main-Line Corporate Holdings Ltd v DBS Bank Ltd: Patent Infringement & Dynamic Currency ConversionHigh Court19 Jul 2012
Judgment for Plaintiff
38Martek v Cargill: Arachidonic Acid Patent Validity - Novelty & Inventive StepHigh Court15 Feb 2012
Appeal Allowed
39AstraZeneca v Sanofi-Aventis: Patent Infringement, Medicines Act s12A, Product LicensingHigh Court18 Jan 2012
Application dismissed
40AstraZeneca AB v Ranbaxy: Striking Out Defence and Counterclaim in Patent Infringement SuitHigh Court12 Jan 2012
Application granted; disputed pleadings in the Defence and Counterclaim struck out.
41Main-Line v UOB & FCC: Patent Infringement, Dynamic Currency Conversion, Account of ProfitsHigh Court19 Dec 2011
Account of profits ordered against United Overseas Bank Limited; claim for damages against First Currency Choice Pte Ltd for infringing use outside Singapore struck out.
42Martek v Cargill: Patent Revocation, Microbial Oil Mixtures, and Infant Formula SupplementationHigh Court28 Mar 2011
Applicant's appeal against the Tribunal's decision in the Revocation Proceedings is allowed. Both parties' appeal and cross-appeal against the Tribunal's decision in the Amendment Proceedings are dismissed, except regarding Claim 42 and consequently Claim 45 in the Proposed 2006 Amendments.
43Martek v Cargill: Patent Revocation Appeal - Adducing Further EvidenceCourt of Appeal27 Dec 2010
Appeal dismissed with costs and the usual consequential orders.
44Martek Biosciences Corp v Cargill: Patent Revocation Appeal - Adducing Further EvidenceHigh Court02 May 2010
Application dismissed with costs.
45Main-Line Corporate Holdings Ltd v United Overseas Bank Ltd: Patent Infringement & Interim PaymentCourt of Appeal02 Mar 2010
Appeal Allowed
46Mühlbauer AG v Manufacturing Integration Technology Ltd: Patent Validity & InfringementCourt of Appeal22 Feb 2010
Appeal Allowed
47Hoya Corp v Asahi Glass Co Ltd: Patent Infringement Dispute over Glass Lens RimHigh Court13 Jan 2010
Appeal allowed in part.
48Main-Line Corporate Holdings Ltd v United Overseas Bank Ltd: Election of Remedies for Patent InfringementHigh Court15 Oct 2009
Appeals Allowed
49Main-Line Corporate Holdings v United Overseas Bank: Patent Infringement & Interim PaymentsHigh Court22 Sep 2009
First defendant's appeal allowed; plaintiff's appeal dismissed.
50ASM Assembly Automation Ltd v Aurigin Technology: Patent Infringement & Validity in Solder Ball Placement TechnologyHigh Court15 Sep 2009
ASM's patent was revoked, and an injunction was granted to restrain ASM from threatening Aurigin with legal proceedings for patent infringement. Aurigin is entitled to damages and costs.