Riddick principle

Riddick principle is a specialized practice area in Singapore's legal system. This area encompasses 10 cases from 2003 to 2024.

Leading Law Firms

Analysis of law firms specializing in Riddick principle, ranked by case volume and success rates.

Law FirmCases
Straits Law Practice LLC0.00% success rate2 cases20.0% of area
WongPartnership LLP50.00% success rate2 cases20.0% of area
Wong & Leow LLC0.00% success rate1 cases10.0% of area
Harry Elias Partnership LLP0.00% success rate1 cases10.0% of area
Lee & Lee0.00% success rate1 cases10.0% of area
LVM Law Chambers LLC0.00% success rate1 cases10.0% of area
Breakpoint LLC0.00% success rate1 cases10.0% of area
Selvam LLC0.00% success rate1 cases10.0% of area
Pereira & Tan LLC0.00% success rate1 cases10.0% of area
Audent Chambers LLC100.00% success rate1 cases10.0% of area

Notable Lawyers

Leading lawyers practicing in Riddick principle, ranked by case volume and success rates.

LawyerCases
N Sreenivasan0.00% success rate2 cases20.0% of area
Koh Swee Yen100.00% success rate1 cases10.0% of area
Wayne Yeo100.00% success rate1 cases10.0% of area
Tian Keyun100.00% success rate1 cases10.0% of area
Lin Weiqi Wendy0.00% success rate1 cases10.0% of area
Fan Wai Leong, Benson0.00% success rate1 cases10.0% of area
Lin Chunlong100.00% success rate1 cases10.0% of area
Mark Tang Yu Zhong100.00% success rate1 cases10.0% of area
Lee Tat Weng, Daniel0.00% success rate1 cases10.0% of area
Chua Sui Tong0.00% success rate1 cases10.0% of area

Recent Judgments

Displaying 10 most recent judgments out of 10 total cases

No.TitleCourtDecision DateOutcomes
1Sang Cheol Woo v Charles Choi Spackman: Amendment of Defence, Abuse of Process & Riddick PrincipleGeneral Division of the High Court25 Nov 2024
Plaintiff's appeal dismissed.
2-03 Nov 2024
Unknown
3True Yoga v Wee Ewe Seng: Lifting Riddick Undertaking for Hong Kong ProceedingsGeneral Division of the High Court24 Apr 2024
Plaintiffs' application allowed, for the sole purpose of allowing the Hong Kong Court to determine whether there had been a breach of its court order in HCA 1469/2019.
4Third Eye Capital Corp v Pretty View Shipping SA: Riddick Principle & DisclosureGeneral Division of the High Court02 Apr 2024
Application allowed.
5Amber Pharmacy v Lim: Riddick Principle, Document Discovery & Criminal InvestigationsHigh Court of the Republic of Singapore17 Nov 2019
Implied undertaking modified to permit disclosure of documents revealing potential commission of Employment of Foreign Manpower Act offences.
6Foo Jong Long Dennis v Ang Yee Lim: Implied Undertaking & Use of Disclosed DocumentsHigh Court28 Jan 2015
The court held that the Riddick principle did not apply to the April 14 Minutes and ordered the trial to continue.
7World Sport Group v Dorsey James Michael: Pre-Action Interrogatories & DefamationHigh Court09 Apr 2013
Appeal allowed in part. The defendant had to answer interrogatories nos 1, 2(a), 2(b), 2(c), 6 and 6.1.
8Littau v Astrata: Interim Injunction & Non-Compete Agreement DisputeHigh Court09 Dec 2010
Orders granted to the defendant were ordered to stand, except for the part of paragraph 2 that allowed the defendant to use the information and documents disclosed or produced pursuant to the search orders for purposes of any claim against the plaintiff as well as the Tridex Companies in and outside Singapore.
9Ser Kim Koi v William Merrell Fulton: Release of Implied Undertaking under Riddick PrincipleHigh Court06 Jan 2009
Application partially allowed; implied undertaking released for specific documents disclosed by the second to fourth defendants, but dismissed for documents disclosed by the first defendant.
10Elan Impex v Daewoo: Wrongful Termination, Service Out of Jurisdiction, and Forum Non ConveniensHigh Court07 Feb 2003
Action against the first defendant and fourth defendant struck out; orders giving leave to serve outside jurisdiction set aside; interim injunctions discharged; claim against the third defendant and the Mareva injunction against him stayed.